Re: CF MX *right* book.

Alex: You're going to get a slew of different answers here, so by the time everybody chimes in, just about every mx book will have been mentioned :) but i'll throw in a ringing endorsement for the MX Bible by Churvis, Churvis, Arehart, and Helms. charlie - Original Message - From: "Alex

RE: CF MX *right* book.

I have been very pleased with "Mastering ColdFusion MX' by 'Danesh, Camden, Bainum and Rish' published by Sybex. It's a mighty heavy book to lug around... but for a 'keep it nearby complete reference', it can't be beat. The examples are clear and simple... and the book is very well edited. -- Ji

Re: CF MX *right* book.

Buy them all, you know you want to. Really though, we bought several that on the face would cover the same material. But when you actually peruse them, they each have different strengths. But I agree that many of them cover material that is often unneeded. To the authors: I'd love separate, focus

RE: CF MX *right* book.

. Hal Helms See halhelms.com for classes in... Java for ColdFusion Programmers Fusebox 4 Mach-II OO Applications with CFCs -Original Message- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:28 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book. Buy them all, you

RE: CF MX *right* book.

If one can develop a well-focused book I would be more than willing to donate some money to help the author self-publish. -Original Message- From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book. Thanks for the

Re: CF MX *right* book.

;OO Applications with CFCs > >-Original Message- >From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:28 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book. > > >Buy them all, you know you want to. > >Really though, we bought several th

Re: CF MX *right* book.

- >From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:11 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book. > > >Thanks for the kind words. I agree with you about having small, >well-focused books but the big publishers (and a depressingly large &

RE: CF MX *right* book.

Not technical enough for me. -Original Message- From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX *right* book. The "Reality" books fall into this category - FlashMX integration, J2EE integration, etc. - Ji

Re: CF MX *right* book.

ser works. - Calvin - Original Message - From: "Hal Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: RE: CF MX *right* book. > Thanks for the kind words. I agree with you about having small, &

Re: CF MX *right* book.

People, thanks a lot to you for opinions about MX book! Alex Timchur ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusio

RE: CF MX *right* book.

We are kinda biased to Ben Forta et al's books - they've sold truckloads - but many other fine authors are out there too. I'm looking for a 6.1 looking title myself. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Su

Re: CF MX *right* book.

> We are kinda biased to Ben Forta et al's books - they've sold truckloads - > but many other fine authors are out there too. I'm looking for a 6.1 looking > title myself. > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coldfusion2/ Massimo Foti Certified Dreamweaver MX Developer Cer

RE: CF MX CFGRAPH -- Hmmm?

Sandy, Thanks for the info and CFCHART has some improved features, but how do you label the X-Axis of a "line chart"? I am using both CFCHART and CFCHARTSERIES and tried CFCHARTDATA, but CFCHARTDATA creates errors The best I can tell is that the itemColumn attribute of CFCHART would be the th

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

Dave, There is no schedule for a service pack and indeed none has even been announced. That is not to say there won't ever be one, if one is needed one will be created, but nothing at this time. You should go ahead with the upgrade, especially as CF5 and CFMX can coexist so you can test side by s

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

>Dave, > >There is no schedule for a service pack and indeed none has even been >announced. That is not to say there won't ever be one, if one is needed >one will be created, but nothing at this time. You should go ahead with >the upgrade, especially as CF5 and CFMX can coexist so you can test sid

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

> Interesting. So there's no plans in the pipeline to address > known issues such as poor COM performance and stuff like that? I don't know how much they can do about that anyway. To provide COM integration, they're using a third-party product called JIntegra, from Intrinsyc: http://www.intrins

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

The COM problems in particular is being looked at. If there is an SP I am sure it will address them, but there is no scheduled SP yet. --- Ben -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 1:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX Service

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

Ben, how about bug: 45938? (select, drop, no recordset is returned) I think CFMX final release still contains this bug... I'm using as a temporary solution for this... Rizal At 12:35 AM 7/6/2002, you wrote: >The COM problems in particular is being looked at. If there is an SP I >am sure it wil

Re: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

-1578 - Original Message - From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline? > > Interesting. So there's no plans in the pipel

Re: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

AIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:04 PM Subject: RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline? > Ben, > how about bug: 45938? > (select, drop, no recordset is returned) > I think CFMX final release still contains this bug... >

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

ware/trial/ -Original Message- From: Nelson Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 July 2002 19:47 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX Service Pack Timeline? I had heard that the inability to do a server-side redirect using getPageContext().forward() on a form action page (having form variables

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

(and when to do it) is directly related to the feedback from customers. --- Ben -Original Message- From: Nelson Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX Service Pack Timeline? I had heard that the inability to do a server

RE: CF MX Service Pack Timeline?

> I noticed on the intrinsyc site that J-Integra is at version 1.5.3 > http://www.intrinsyc.com/products/bridging/jintegra_15release.asp > > I don't know what version CFMX uses but was wondering if an > end user could upgrade to the lastest build? I don't know how you can tell what version of JI

CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Monday, April 29, 2002 7:44 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX > > Jump over to the Neo forums on the beta site - Libby English of > Macromedia : "You can now discuss all aspects of the new CF release..." > > --- > Billy Cravens > > > -Original

Re: CF MX and attributes variables

I use CFMX and fusebox without any problems. Everything IS Attribute Scoped. No special config needed. Brook At 03:53 PM 1/13/2003 -0800, you wrote: >What a headache! One of my clients recently upgraded to CF MX from CF >5.0. Here is a problem that we had, I was wondering if anyone else has >see

RE: CF MX and attributes variables

Yeah, worked fine on the dev box, was not sure what was happening Robert Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Famous for nothing!" http://www.tinetics.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subje

RE: CF MX scheduler not working...

> We just switched to MX and can not get the scheduler to work. > We have an SSL site. We can not allow basic authentication on > the main site so we made another site just for the schedule > jobs. We made it basic auth. We can get the pages to run in > the borwser but get the following in th

RE: CF MX scheduler not working...

>Are you able to resolve the URL in a browser on the server console? If >not, >the machine might not be resolving DNS queries correctly. If you mean by clicking on the "Run Schedule Task" button on the schedule tasks screen, we did try this. That is how we are getting the error. >Since you've

RE: CF MX scheduler not working...

> > Are you able to resolve the URL in a browser on the server > > console? If not, the machine might not be resolving DNS queries > > correctly. > > If you mean by clicking on the "Run Schedule Task" button on the > schedule tasks screen, we did try this. That is how we are getting > the error.

RE: RE: CF MX *right* book.

Rob Brooks-Bilson has a book published by O'Reilley which has content for 6.1 release of CFMX. It is called "Programming ColdFusion MX, 2nd Edition" and you can find details here in our blog. http://www.webapper.net/index.cfm?fuseaction=Fuseblog.ShowComments&ArticleID=20030818084646 Hth Kind

Re: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue

> > > > > > > > I don't believe you can use StructDelete() on scopes. I would rewrite the code as follows. Although, you may not be able to set values in the form scope either as some scopes have become read-only. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Softwar

RE: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue

StructDelete on the Form scope works just fine, as does setting form values: chris From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue

RE: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue

The code works, but since variables changed over to structures in CF MX I am get the error with cfinsert and cfupdate. Thanks, Andrew -Original Message- From: chris kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 Migration

RE: CF MX 6.1 Migration issue

> I don't believe you can use StructDelete() on scopes. Within CFMX, you can use StructDelete, or any other structure function, on almost any scope, as they are all exposed as writeable structures. > Although, you may not be able to set values in the form > scope either as some scopes have becom

RE: CF MX and speed issues

Try turning on trusted cache in your cfmx admin. For me, that makes the biggest difference in performance since the files live on a mapped drive, which is slow.   -Original Message-   From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:06 AM   To: CF-T

RE: CF MX and speed issues

Silly thought, but if you use CFCs extensively AND have the debugging service enabled (even if you're not displaying the information) then you can see a HUGE performance drop due to all the method calls being logged by the debugger. I've got one process that ran 122 seconds with debugging on, 19

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

Try using createODBCDateTime() to specify a dateobject, instead of to_date() Micha Schopman Software Engineer Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL  Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription]

Re: cf mx and oracle 8i

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:51:37 +0200, Steff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I have a request like > insert into toolbox > (idtoolbox,label,descr,language,idlinktype,idsource,creatingdate,updatingdat > e,publish,delstatus,orderby) values (2,'services et > catégories','','FR',0,0,to_date('2004-

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

I try and I obtain ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes Can you help me? thanks steff   -Message d'origine-   De : Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Envoyé : Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:06 AM   À : CF-Talk   Objet : RE: cf mx and oracle 8i   Try using createODBCDateTime() to spec

Re: cf mx and oracle 8i

]> wrote: > I try and I obtain ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes > Can you help me? > thanks > steff >   -Message d'origine- >   De : Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >   Envoyé : Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:06 AM >   À : CF-Talk >   Objet : RE: cf mx

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

We need more info from you, we can only guess at the moment - Is the datetime value you are inserting between the boundaries of the datetime type you have set with Oracle? (small datetime, large datetime, etc) -  On which column does the error occur (take away cols, add cols, to your

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

f -Message d'origine- De : Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:24 AM À : CF-Talk Objet : RE: cf mx and oracle 8i   We need more info from you, we can only guess at the moment   - Is the datetime value you are inserting between the boundaries of t

Re: cf mx and oracle 8i

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:32:35 +0200, Steff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think where is the problem, I get date values with a query. The table > value  is like 19-JUL-04. Coldfusion gives me a date like '2004-07-19 > 00:00:00.0' to_date can't convert. So I should certainly before insert > query, mo

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

Well you can create a new date object using CreateDateTime, CreateODBCDateTime, after stripping out the wanted values with Left, Right and Mid. So for DD-MM- you could do Micha Schopman Software Engineer Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL  Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-

Re: cf mx and oracle 8i

Steff wrote: > > insert into toolbox > (idtoolbox,label,descr,language,idlinktype,idsource,creatingdate,updatingdat > e,publish,delstatus,orderby) values (2,'services et > cat�gories','','FR',0,0,to_date('2004-07-19 00:00:00.0', > 'dd/mm/'),to_date('2004-07-19 00:00:00.0', 'dd/mm/'),1,0,

RE: cf mx and oracle 8i

Thanks, it works well. cordialy Steff   -Message d'origine-   De : Simon Whittaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Envoyé : Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:37 AM   À : CF-Talk   Objet : Re: cf mx and oracle 8i   On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:32:35 +0200, Steff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   >

RE: CF MX 6.1 ODBC problems?

Solution : Dont use ODBC Driver with MS-SQL Server. Options 1. Checkout the Microsoft JDBC Driver for MS-SQL (Better Performance) Or 2. You can use the CFMX JDBC Driver HTH Joe Eugene   -Original Message-   From: Chad Nikirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:44 P

RE: CF MX 6.1 ODBC problems?

> We are running MX 6.1.  MX seems to run fine, but about every > 8 - 12 hours it crashes.  Our site will come back with a > coldfusion datasource error after a while.  The datasource > can connect to the database no problem even while the error > is occuring.  The only way to fix it is to rest

RE: cf mx exception error messages

What do you mean the page is missing? -Original Message- From: Dave Nixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf mx exception error messages Can anyone explain below why you get a SQL query error for a page that is possibly missing??? I am c

RE: cf mx exception error messages

>What do you mean the page is missing? > >-Original Message- >From: Dave Nixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:59 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: cf mx exception error messages > >Can anyone explain below why you get a SQL query error for a page that is >possibly missing

RE: cf mx exception error messages

I know that those pages are not there yet Thanks Dave >What do you mean the page is missing? > >-Original Message- >From: Dave Nixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:59 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: cf mx exception error messages > >Can anyone explain below why you

Re: cf mx exception error messages

CF sometimes gets a little weird with templates that once existed, but no longer exist. This is by design if you have the template cache enabled, but it can happen even with it off. Clear your cfclasses directory (inside WEB-INF) and restart and it'll probably go away. cheers, barneyb On 7/8/05

Re: CF MX Quiet Install Procedures

On 7/23/05, Graham Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I am teaching a Coldfusion Class next week and have been trying to > create a CD that will install Coldfusion in Quiet mode with a default > administrator password and every time I perform t

Re: CF MX Quiet Install Procedures

Graham, Frankly, I can't recall if that silent install procedure will add the ODBC services or not, but I can tell you that if the reason you want to install them is so that you can connect to MS Access, then you can actually just use the "Microsoft Access with Unicode" driver from the drop do

Re: CF MX 7 ODBC services

On Tuesday 22 Jan 2008, Email Test wrote: > Setup\RemoveSequeLink.bat fails to remove them, probably because the > ...bat file which was included in the CF 7 install, is looking for the > correct MX 7 services. Did you try editing the names in the batch file ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to authori

Re: CF MX 7 ODBC services

Well, I can't now because I reinstalled CF 7. I would like to try to figure out how to install them seperately. Just put a '7' in the CF template for the install? Thanks ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most imp

Re: CF MX 7 ODBC services

Well, I can't now because I reinstalled CF 7. I would like to try to figure out how to install them seperately. Just put a '7' in the CF template for the install? Thanks > On Tuesday 22 Jan 2008, Email Test wrote: > > Setup\RemoveSequeLink.bat fails to remove them, probably because > the

Re: CF MX 6.1 - zipping files

Java http://cflib.org/udf/ZipFileNew =] On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:54 AM, wrote: > > I'm stuck with CFMX6.1 for our Intranet and need to zip up a csv file after > I created it from a query output. Anyone have any ideas how zip functions > were done back in th

Re: CF MX 6.1 - zipping files

http://www.newsight.de/2005/06/28/finished-work-on-zip-cfc/ Haven't used it, so can't vouch for it... but I do have a CFMX7 gig I'm working on, and will be looking to implement this in the next few days myself. On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:54 AM, wrote: > > I'm stuck with CFMX6.1 for our Intrane

Re: CF MX 6.1 - zipping files

>>Haven't used it, so can't vouch for it... I have. Works fine on CF 7. At least I have not had any problems with it. The doc header sez that it works on 6.x: "Support: ColdFusion MX 6.0, ColdFusion MX 6.1, ColdFusion MX 7" HTH G! On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Charlie Griefer wrote: > >

RE: CF MX 6.1 - zipping files

: Charlie Griefer [mailto:charlie.grie...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:00 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 - zipping files http://www.newsight.de/2005/06/28/finished-work-on-zip-cfc/ Haven't used it, so can't vouch for it... but I do have a CFMX7 gig I'm

RE: CF MX / FLASH MX - Tree Menu

> Anyways, does this sound like a good Flash MX project? I > have never used Flash to interact with dynmaic data so any tips, > links, advice, or thoughts would be much appreciated. Well, the answer is two fold. One hand, yes, this is actually a great Flash MX project. On the other hand,

Re: CF MX / FLASH MX - Tree Menu

menu? Data Binding and Data Glue.. any other concepts/ideas/or approaches? I appreciate the help. Mike - Original Message - From: "Ben Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 6:41 PM Subj

RE: CF MX / FLASH MX - Tree Menu

2 7:03 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF MX / FLASH MX - Tree Menu > > > Thanks Ben. > > I think I will go with the Flash approach now.. no better > time to get up to > speed.. I'll deal with the elarning curve. :-) > > Flashkit.com has been useful in

RE: CF MX / FLASH MX - Tree Menu

k at the reference window for the fTree component and you'll see all its methods available to you. I'm still learning myself, so the above may be stylistically yucky, but it the idea is right. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 19 J

Re: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

Community driven bug-hunt: http://www.cfbughunt.org/ ~Todd On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN) wrote: > Is there a somewhere that I can find the following: > > 1.Known bugs/limitations with CF MX > 2.Known issues with CF5 apps sent over to a MX server. > > > Boss wants t

Re: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

you might want to look at this. http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/Migrating_ColdFusion_5_Applications/ contents.htm - Original Message - From: "Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:48 AM Subject: CF MX

RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

Hmmm, can't get that page to come up ~~ Stephenie Hamilton Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX bugs/transition problems

RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -Original Message- > From: Stephenie Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:38 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info > > &g

RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

> > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:53 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF MX bugs/transition problems info > > > > > > Community driven b

RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

> Community driven bug-hunt: > http://www.cfbughunt.org/ Doesn't seem to work. Anyone else? __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionautho

RE: CF MX bugs/transition problems info

Yeah, it's sporadic at best for some odd reason. Keep checking it. On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Everett, Al wrote: > > Community driven bug-hunt: > > http://www.cfbughunt.org/ > > Doesn't seem to work. Anyone else? -- Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:11 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) Yup, you're right. Well in that case on with the ensuing flame war. First the caveats; CFMX has not been tuned for performance yet according to MM. With that asi

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

2002 11:30 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 people using CF > at once on an intranet application, (I also use CF from a shared host) > there is no advantage to going to MX? I'm still

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

At 11:29 AM 4/29/2002 -0400, you wrote: >So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 people using CF >at once on an intranet application, (I also use CF from a shared host) >there is no advantage to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a great >reason to upgrade to CF 5.0. Performance

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

> So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 > people using CF at once on an intranet application, (I > also use CF from a shared host) there is no advantage > to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a great reason > to upgrade to CF 5.0. Sure, there are lots of reasons! They're not

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

5. This is our goal. > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 > &g

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

like CFMX is for me. I wish it was, though. - Matt Small -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) At 11:29 AM 4/29/2002 -0400, you wrote: >So, in a small company

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) Also think about the performance that you're seeing right now. On first run, a CFMX page "compiles". The pages are no longer interpreted on the fly. This means your initial "First Hit" is going to take a few seconds, but eve

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

No performance advantage really. You should upgrade for the new features though. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:30 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) >

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Show me that the performance is the same. It is *not*. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:45 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > No performance advantage r

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

.org, http://www.evolt.org/article/Scalability_s_New_Meaning/21/23896/index.ht ml. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > Also t

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:45 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) No performance advantage really. You should upgrade for the new features though. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, Ap

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Well, it would be silly to make a program slower or indeed the same speed as CF5! I can see the headline now - "New ColdFusion MX, now the same speed as CF5 - upgrade now!" ;-) Neil Clark Team Macromedia http://www.macromedia.com/go/team Announcing Macromedia MX!! -- h

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

rena. -mk P.S. - yeah yeah, I know "it's not optimized". But let's be honest, as a rule, JSP is pretty doggy. -Original Message- From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

: helloWorld.cfc?wsdl voila, instant web service. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > >

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) Matt, here is where you and I disagree alot: CF 5 > performance than 4.5.1, hands down. Period. Hopefully, when we *release* CFMX, CFMX will be &g

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

> Scalability is simply not the issue it was back in > the day ... And even "back in the day" it wasn't the issue. Otherwise, writing your apps directly within API extensions would've been where the development happened, not scripting languages. Or maybe everyone would've been like STEVE GIBSON,

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

Which features are so essential that I need to upgrade? - Matt Small -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:45 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) No performance advantage really. You should upgrade for

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

, 2002 10:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) It's a great goal, but have a look at the other folks in the J2EE world who have been at it a long time. Again, on a single server, a properly built CF 5 application is going to out perform one built on top of JRun, WebS

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

ttle anymore in defending CF. Robert Everland III Dixon Ticonderoga Web Developer Extraordinaire -Original Message- From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) Jesse, Yes, subseque

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

ay, April 29, 2002 11:45 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > >No performance advantage really. You should upgrade for the new features >though. > >-Matt > >> -Original Message- >> From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

de? >> >>- Matt Small >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:45 AM >>To: CF-Talk >>Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) >> >>No performance advantage really.

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

> So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 people using CF > at once on an intranet application, (I also use CF from a shared host) > there is no advantage to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a great > reason to upgrade to CF 5.0. Talking about the demo of MX that I saw Jeremy All

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:27 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > Which features are so essential that I need to > upgrade? > > - Matt Small > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[

Re: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:26 AM Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > Which features are so essential that I need to > upgrade? > > - Matt Small > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: M

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

How is this different than calling a CFM page via cfhttp? -Original Message- From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:01 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) ColdFusionMX components. create the code once and then call it

Re: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > I for one find speed to be a major deciding factor, I really like that it is > J2EE compliant, buzzword, buzzword compliant, buzzwor

RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

> Which features are so essential that I need to > upgrade? Nothing is ESSENTIAL... But the speed increase, the programming flexibility, the extra functionality all add up If you were going to stick with items which weren't essential, then you'd still be using a Pentium 100, using IE3 and NS2,

Re: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX)

CF MX press release, but I'll be damned if I can get cfhttp in 5.0 to talk to their XML gateway... jon - Original Message - From: "Matthew R. Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:34 PM Subject

<    1   2   3   4   5   >