He's not a troll. He's a doofus gumby.
- Original Message -
From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:51 pm
Subject: RE: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> hehe you people really don't see the troll?
>
> Matt != Fuseboxer
just stick it in
>the
>local directory for that application.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 21 December 2001 11:33
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: RE: RE: RE: cf_objectdump
>>
>>
>>
Client.LastVisit variable and get a value other than the current time?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: JL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 August 2000 14:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RE: RE: Session timeout?]
>
>
> then do you ever get timeout
August 2000 15:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: [RE: RE: Session timeout?]]
I set another variable client.LastVisit2 = client.LastVisit at the end of
application.cfm
then I compare the lastvisit2 with now() at the top of application.cfm =)
Andy Ewings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
heh heh.
- Original Message -
From: Angus McFee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:08 pm
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> Hal -
>
> I've heard from plenty of people looking for a way to beat up on
> Fusebox, but usually they have nothing
Sigh...
Where did he say anywhere that those benefits are exclusive to fusebox?
Point is, fusebox provides those benefits, not that they're the exclusive domain of
fusebox...
- Original Message -
From: Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:52 pm
Oh man...
Hal Helms was one of the main creators and is one of the biggest supporters of fusebox.
Matt Liotta does not use fusebox.
You, sir, are out of it.
- Original Message -
From: Angus McFee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:09 pm
Subject: RE: RE: re: M
hehe you people really don't see the troll?
Matt != Fuseboxer;
Hal == FuseboxGhod;
Angus == Troll;
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Sigh...
Where did h
I have to comment on this
> > * it separates business logic from presentation logic, making for
> > more organized, efficent code
Seperating presentation from logic is not limited to, nor requires the
Fusebox methodology.
> > * it gives developers a common set of rules and methods to work
>
-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> Sigh...
>
> Where did he say anywhere that those benefits are exclusive to fusebox?
>
> Point is, fusebox provides those b
t rename the file to dump.cfm - hey presto:
>
>Job's a good'un.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 21 December 2001 10:51
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: RE: RE: cf_objectdump
>>
&g
If you don't have access to the custom tag directory, just stick it in
the
local directory for that application.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 December 2001 11:33
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: cf_object
You can use a windows platform. If you need more help, email me directly.
- Original Message -
From: "Ciliotta, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:41 pm
Subject: RE: RE: CFREPORT
> This looks really cool. I assume you need to running Apach
.com
ICQ: 417645
http://www.aeps2000.com
954-472-6684 X303
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: Source Control for Linux]]]
> to do remote ch
lk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: Source Control for Linux
> user@IPADDRESS:/cvssrc/CVSROOT
>
> try using the .rhosts authentication
>
> CVS has to be running as a pserver on the linux box and make sure you
c
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 11:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: Source Control for Linux
user@IPADDRESS:/cvssrc/CVSROOT
try using the .rhosts authentication
CVS has to be running as a pserver on the linux box and make
> What you mean the objects on the page, you mean these things:
>
>
Yes.
>
> If I use
>
>
>
> I can very easily edit textbox.cfm to change how the textbox acts.
Yes, but you have to edit the file, before you run the template. I'm changing the
properties of the textbox _at runtime_.
Let's
gt;
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:53 pm
Subject: RE: RE: CF or .net?
> Mike,
>
> While it's true that Java is not owned by anyone it does suffer from
> institutional infighting and proprietary vendor issues. I'm a
> little tepid
> on that item. I agree with everythi
, but the final authority rests with Sun.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark A. Kruger - CFG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:53 pm
Subject: RE: RE: CF or .net?
> Mike,
>
> While it's true that Java is not owned by anyone it does suffer from
that
developers seem to think they do.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: CF or .net?
Good points but there is still a huge difference between the ownership
implications of .NET and
OK, I am using Windows 98 and Personal Oracle 8i. I already have the NT
machine with CF and Oracle 8i enterprise edition. I want to migrate the
configuration from NT machine to the windows 98 machine, but the CF server can
not connect to the personal oracle 8i. Do you use personal oracle or
enterp
CF4.5, Oracle Personal 8i, NT4(sp5).
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I am using Windows 98 and Personal Oracle 8i. I already have the NT
machine with CF and Oracle 8i enterprise edition. I want to migrate the
configuration from NT machine to the windows 98 machine, but the CF server can
not connect to th
But the session vars (CFID and CFToken) can be in the URL as well...thus
avoiding cookies.
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Olive, Christopher M Mr NMR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:50 AM
Subjec
t: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:35 AM
Subject: RE:
> right.
>
> i'll wrap my reply to you and mr hanlin into one response.
>
> the USUALLY rely on cookies. as in, this is the default behaviour. one
has
> to add code to get them to be passed in the URL.
>
> perhaps i'
National Express.
-Original Message-
From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2003 15:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: re"
INSERT INTO strfields
(
;-)
Michael Traher
-Original Message-
From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2003 15:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: re"
INSERT INTO strf
I think I can get away using just
This is what I have.
I'm checked to see if ListGetAt(Line,1,'|') matches one of the above in the variables
test. Is this the correct syntax?
From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 September 2003 15:36
> To: CF-Talk
>
> I used scope_identity() for a while and ran into problems with
> setting up tables and such because of how the identity columns
> work in sql server... it's kind of an involved story, but in my
> case at one point it had significantly to do with the fact that
> you can't set an existing integ
ou get the idea
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 August 2000 15:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RE: Session timeout?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Andy,
> I cant do that cause i an d
Ummm...ok.but if that's the case how can you ever interrogate the
Client.LastVisit variable and get a value other than the current time?
-Original Message-
From: JL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 August 2000 14:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: RE: Session ti
On 8/25/00, JL penned:
>then do you ever get timeout?
>if you compare the client.lastvisit with now(), it will never GTE 30 because
>client.LastVisit is always updated before you excute this piece of code.
>
>I use client management too...
I use this which deletes all client variables if they hav
date.cfm)
>
>> > datasource="testingDB">
>>select * from Welcome
>>
>
>The select expires the cache and then when the next person
hits the home
>page it will be recached for two days
>
>John.
>
>> -----Original Messa
Which is born out by:
Assembly is faster than everything.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew R. Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 pm
Subject: RE: RE: UDF question
> You're right... it seems that the real question is whether or not the
&
o to appear.
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 2:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [RE: [database update?]]
replace it over FTP at night. this has nothing to do with CF
Peter Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a whole new access DB
Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [RE: SNMP Tag?]
http://www.mrtg.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (lsellers) wrote:
>
> Is anyone aware of a CF tag that can communicate with an SNMP enabled
> servic
ol Bluestein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re:RE: RE: Request Scope
>
>
> Jason,
> Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
> That makes so much more sense.
>
> May I trouble you one more time for the code, and I'm
003 3:39 pm
Subject: RE: RE: Image manipulation
> That part I got...what I wasn't factoring in was the "resampling" that
> was taking place when I was resizing the images...
>
> When resampling occurs, the image is changed. When resizing
> occurs without resampling, a n
e out what "IIRC" is...what does
that stand for?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: Image manipulation
>
&g
IIRC = If I Recall Correctly
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: Image manipulation
> Right...that's what occ
Hmm, .NET version, eh?
You've just saved me a ton of work :)
- Original Message -
From: Hal Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:43 pm
Subject: RE: re: Mach-II
> It's not just for cross-language purposes, Isaac, though that is
> important (we&#x
Or potentially New Atlanta's .NET version of BlueDragon. :)
> Hmm, .NET version, eh?
> You've just saved me a ton of work :)
> - Original Message -
> From: Hal Helms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:43 pm
> Subject: RE: re: M
ingle
syntax for all languages makes the choice of XML especially compelling,
we thought.
Hal Helms
"Java for CF Programmers" class
in Las Vegas, August 18-22
www.halhelms.com
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:00 AM
To:
>Oooh... ensuring that FB3 apps can migrate smoothly over
>being the primary goal (asside from consistency across
>multiple languages)... that makes a lot more sense to me now. :)
>
You sure that's what he meant? I took it to mean versions *of Mach-II*, not
Fusebox versions. One common miscon
Think he was talking mach-ii only.
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
>Oooh... ensuring that FB3 apps can migrate smoothly over
>being the primary goal (assid
August 18-22
www.halhelms.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
>Oooh... ensuring that FB3 apps can migrate smoothly over being the
>primary goal (asside from consistency
From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
You're right, Dave. We're not looking to be able to incorporate Fusebox 3 (or 4) with
Mach-II. We think that Fusebox is a great framework for procedural programmers.
Oh my...perhaps you should surf around over at http://www.halhelms.com
and get a little more familiar with who you're addressing your comments
to. :)
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: R
> What I have to ask you is: do you use fusebox?
Are you really asking this to Hal Helms???
Maybe you should check his website:
http://www.halhelms.com/
Or this:
http://www.techspedition.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=products.listBooks
Massimo Foti
Certified Dreamweav
ul 2003 13:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Hal -
I've heard from plenty of people looking for a way to beat up on Fusebox,
but usually they have nothing to say when it comes to building a better
framework. This is the first time in a long time anyone h
hehe troll.
Silly people.
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Hal -
I've heard from plenty of people looking for a way to beat up on Fusebox,
but usually they have nothi
lk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> Hal -
>
> I've heard from plenty of people looking for a way to beat up on Fusebox,
but usually they have nothing to say when it comes to building a better
framework. This is the fir
ing to get what it is all about.
Angus McFee
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Mach-II
This is a joke right?
-Matt
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 04:08 PM, Angus McFee wrote:
> Hal -
>
Wholly crap, and I thought I lived under a rock.
- Original Message -
From: "Angus McFee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> Hal -
>
> I've heard from
s well and so both can be
applicable in different situations.
Jim Davis
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:09 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
>
> Matt -
>
> Good to hear from a fe
erstand."
Hal Helms
"Java for CF Programmers" class
in Las Vegas, August 18-22
www.halhelms.com
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Matt -
Good to hear from
, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
This is the best thread in years,
Now Angus do you know Stan Cox? I think he'll be at the FB conference in
Vegas at the end of August, I'd buy both of you drinks, if I
Damn, I fell for it. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Matt -
Good to hear from a fellow fuseboxer!
No, this isn't a joke, this guy clearly has a problem with
nesday, July 30, 2003 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Matt -
Good to hear from a fellow fuseboxer!
No, this isn't a joke, this guy clearly has a problem with what fusebox
has become and has made this other framework that clearly doesn't do
most of what Fusebox is capab
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Yeah, yeah, I've heard of this "Fusebox" framework. I've even used it
once or twice. I just don't get what the big deal is, though. Sure it
helps you separate logic and presentation, it helps teams work together,
it provides encapsulation, etc
2003 2:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Wholly crap, and I thought I lived under a rock.
- Original Message -
From: "Angus McFee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: RE:
.fusebox.org/index.cfm?&fuseaction=learn.FAQ#Q3
Well, ... I think you get the point ...
H.
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus McFee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:09 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
>
> Mat
EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: GoCatGo1956
~~
> -Original Message-
> From: Hal Helms [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:36 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
>
> Yeah, yeah, I've heard
ssage-
From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 9:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Angus, ever happen to see this page?
http://www.fusebox.org/index.cfm?&fuseaction=learn.resourceList
Or this one
http://www.fusebox.org/index.cfm?&a
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Ahhh,
I was wondering when the name of Stan was going to come into this. Where
has he been anyway?
Rock the House and Horse and stuff :P
Timothy Heald
Information Systems Specialist
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2235
TED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
> Yeah, yeah, I've heard of this "Fusebox" framework. I've even used it
> once or twice. I just don't get what the big deal is, though. Sure it
> helps you separate logic and presentation,
I'm not falling for this - will the real 'Angus Mcfee III' step forward.
(Thanks for the laughs!)
Michael Traher
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 21:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Hal -
I've heard f
nono it's like building a house silly.
Timothy Heald
Information Systems Specialist
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2235
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subjec
Anyone knowledgeable with Mach-II that can offer a comparison with
http://www.cfobjects.com ?
Dan
=== Previous Message Below ===
-Original Message-
From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE
I myself use SP's whenever possible (there are times when this isn't
possible). However, it's beneficial to correctly outline what
does, for those people on the list that should be using
.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:03
ing Partner
http://www.aeps.com
ICQ: 417645
http://www.aeps2000.com
954-472-6684 X303
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [RE: Source Control for Linux]]
> It does
Allaire ColdFusion Consulting Partner
http://www.aeps.com
ICQ: 417645
http://www.aeps2000.com
954-472-6684 X303
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: So
:37 am
Subject: RE: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> Um, how is this any different from
>
>
>
>
>
> Customer name
>
> ?
>
>
> ===
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Min
eus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
>
>
> You
Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:54 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
>
>
> What you mean the objects on the page, you mean these things:
>
>
>
ay, July 17, 2003 1:42 pm
Subject: RE: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> Um, so the class is what, magical fairy dust? ;) Sone had to write the
> class. A class is a file, right? Now, that being said, it's "built-in"
> to ASP
It depends on the type of changes you're making to the presentation layer. No system
is going to help you if you remove the textbox from the page - you're going to have to
make not-insignificant code changes. All architectures like MVC do is _minimize_ the
_number_ and _impact_ of changes. It
> It depends on the type of changes you're making to the
> presentation layer. No system is going to help you if you
> remove the textbox from the page - you're going to have to
> make not-insignificant code changes. All architectures like
> MVC do is _minimize_ the _number_ and _impact_ of c
Does Oracle's ODBC driver support the cfquery timeout attribute? The
Microsoft ODBC for Oracle doesn't seem to...
Thanks :)
EC
.
~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. ht
g to do on Sunday, I could
mess around with this.
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:05 am
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFQuery Error - No more ConnectString ???
> So using a servlet I could basically bypass the CFMX Merant
> driv
I used scope_identity() for a while and ran into problems with setting up tables and
such because of how the identity columns work in sql server... it's kind of an
involved story, but in my case at one point it had significantly to do with the fact
that you can't set an existing integer primary
> But then the view is not updateable. The rules for
> updateability are complex and very specific.
Ahh...
>> Using UUID's should nearly if not guarantee that
>> there would be no need even for modifying the employeei
>
> If you want us to be abe to read everything you write, please
> use an ema
hth.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Original Message ---
Actually I am looking for some fair comparisons of the two products (CF and .net) to
present to our group.
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
S
Java is owned by Sun Microsystems Incorporated. There is a community process in place
that recommends changes to Java, but the final authority rests with Sun.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark A. Kruger - CFG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:53 pm
Subjec
er it be IBM/SUN/BEA/ORCALE?
3.What do you need to develop a Java J2EE/Other App?
J2EE complex and expensive talent..YES. But how many times does a company re-write
software?
Is Tomcat expensive? is J2SE(JDK) expensive? Maintenance contracts?
Vs
C#/Visual Basic (MS whatever)
What are your choi
Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
opps...
>Java as the open platform? Java i
, IBM ORACLE) all have ways of soaking you.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
opps...
>Java as the open platform? Java is a platform supported by >multiple
vendors, yes
mberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
opps...
>Java as the open platform? Java is a platform supported by >multi
... ergo Java would have less of a faithful following among developers
(lol)...
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
I think the two big balance points are
12:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
I think the two big balance points are:
Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers.
v.
MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and cheaper.
If java became the big open source language used by all, you would most
likely see
ssage-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
I think the two big balance points are:
Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers.
v.
MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and ch
ssage-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
I think the two big balance points are:
Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers.
v.
MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and ch
03, 2003 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java
The only way you'll see a reversal in numbers/pay is if schools were
capable
of separating business and actually educate ... Microsoft rules the
schools
and uses the schools to "educate" students on Microsoft products,
I've tried that way. But the CF still can't connect to the datasource. Can you
give me more detail setting in tnsnames and listener?
Notes: I am using Windows 98, not NT.
Thanks.
Irwan
"Larry Meadors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly! ;-)
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01/00 09:11AM >>>
> Th
Sorry, I wish I had more details. Mine just worked, and I've only done it on NT4.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/02/00 01:34PM >>>
I've tried that way. But the CF still can't connect to the datasource. Can you
give me more detail setting in tnsnames and listener?
Notes: I am using Windows 98, not NT.
Phew :)
Ok, I feel better now. Thanks guys.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kitta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 6, 2004 11:11 am
Subject: RE: RE: MySQL and CF
> You mean that you just created CFML application that uses mySQL as
> a backend
> and sell t
Thanks. I found their licensing pages on their site; they don't really mention anything about hosted applications. Is there a specific page with that information on it?
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 6, 2004 11:15 am
Subj
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: MySQL and CF
>
> Thanks. I found their licensing pages on their site; they
> don't really mention anything about hosted applications. I
Thank you James.
It still amazes me that loads of people don't use HTMLEditFormat().
Nothing like seeing lots of pages break simply because of people
entering quotes.
- Original Message -
From: James Ang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:52 pm
Subject:
:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: FW: RE: Quotation Hell
Thank you James.
It still amazes me that loads of people don't use HTMLEditFormat().
Nothing like seeing lots of pages break simply because of people
entering quotes.
- Original Message -
From: James Ang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
> I have a form which the user gets to fill in, they put into a type="text"...
> A quote: "To be or not to be"
>
> now in my insert statement I have...
> INSERT INTO sometable (somecol)
> VALUES ('#htmlEditFormat(form.field)#')
>
> which translates to..
> INSERT INTO sometable (somecol)
> VALUES
1 - 100 of 62902 matches
Mail list logo
