Hi all,
My SQL mojo seems to have left me. Here is the situation, I have 1
table. In this table there are some times two rows that should have
actually been one. Here is an example to explain.
Table: Name, Age, address one, address two
Row 1: Steve,40,123 Anystreet,NULL
Row 2:
How do you know the 2 Steve's are the same Steve?
What if there was another Steve who was also 40 but lived elsewhere?
Can you provide some more realistic data? And how you'd know they were
the same Steve? or whomever?
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:57 PM, DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT)
Subject: Re: Need a little sql help...
How do you know the 2 Steve's are the same Steve?
What if there was another Steve who was also 40 but lived elsewhere?
Can you provide some more realistic data? And how you'd know they were
the same Steve? or whomever
Subject: Re: Need a little sql help...
How do you know the 2 Steve's are the same Steve?
What if there was another Steve who was also 40 but lived elsewhere?
Can you provide some more realistic data? And how you'd know they were
the same Steve? or whomever
.
Sorry for the confusion, I just redact true data whenever possible.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Morphis [mailto:gmorp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 2:00 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Need a little sql help...
How do you know the 2 Steve's are the same Steve?
What
I am having a SQL problem that I'm guessing amounts to me just being brain
dead today but I'd really appreciate any help with this. Here is the query:
SELECT phases.phase AS phaseLabel,
narratives.title,
narratives.id,
narratives.content,
phases.id AS phaseId
FROM
Figured it out. I was missing a join. Should have been:
SELECT DISTINCT phases.phase AS phaseLabel,
narratives.title,
narratives.id,
narratives.content,
phases.id AS phaseId
FROM( ( nsftool.phases2company phases2company
Brad, I'll have to look at your response in much greater detail, but I
can tell you this.
Currently, I'm running a CF script that populates a prospect_export
table once a day. The initial query returns 25,785 rows, which gets
flattened into 20,265 rows for reporting purposes.
Ultimately I'd
I'm hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. I'm
doing something in CF that I really need to be doing in SQL:
I need to flatten this data:
select
A.entityid,
A.MEMBERID,
A.RELTYPE,
A.leaderFlag
from
Hi Rick,
This is where the limiting nature of SQL comes in--SQL is a set language
and has no (or very limited) looping/reshaping capability. Unless MS
has extended their SQL in ways I'm not aware of, this would be nearly
impossible. That's where the power of CF comes in.
--Ben
Rick Root
This is where the limiting nature of SQL comes in--SQL is a set language
and has no (or very limited) looping/reshaping capability. Unless MS
has extended their SQL in ways I'm not aware of, this would be nearly
impossible. That's where the power of CF comes in.
That's not true. You can
You might also take a look at ms sql 2005's row_number() function. You may be
able to partition the data and use row_number() to limit the returned records.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186734.aspx
Original Message
Subject: (ot) Transact-SQL Help
From: Rick Root rick.r...@webworksllc.com
Date: Thu, September 10, 2009 12:25 pm
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
I'm hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. I'm
doing something in CF that I
As long as you are only dealing with a dozen or so records
from the database it should perform fine and and I think it will be
a heck of a lot simpler than trying to make your SQL server take a
row-based list of people and pivot them out into columns.
Assuming the example is actually
Yep, EXISTS will virtually always be faster, usually MUCH faster, than a
correlated subquery, because a subquery is evaluated for EVERY ROW processed
by the outer query.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Mark Henderson shadefro...@gmail.comwrote:
Brian Kotek wrote:
WHERE NOT EXISTS should
Greetings from the chilly south,
I have this query and it returns the expected result set, but I can't
work out how to use a join instead of the NOT IN clause and I *know*
that is going to be more efficient. Basically, I want to exclude the
current special from the result set. Any ideas?
Mark,
What DBMS are you using?
If its SQL Server, I don't think what you want to do is possible other than
how you have already done it. If you find another way to do it (with a join)
I would also be interested to see that.
Kevin Roche
Kevin Roche wrote:
Mark,
What DBMS are you using?
If its SQL Server, I don't think what you want to do is possible other than
how you have already done it. If you find another way to do it (with a join)
I would also be interested to see that.
Kevin Roche
Hi Kevin,
Yes it's MS SQL.
Mark,
You might be right but I never got that to work myself, in MSSQL.
An experiment you might try is to do that subquery separately in a different
CFQUERY then plug in the retrieved value. Occasionally I have found that
knid of trick is quicker.
Kevin
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Mark
: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:27 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: SQL Help
Greetings from the chilly south,
I have this query and it returns the expected result set, but I can't
work out how to use a join instead of the NOT IN clause and I *know*
that is going to be more efficient. Basically, I want to exclude
Try this:
...
FROM
tbl_ForSaleCategories C
INNER JOIN (
tbl_RecentlyViewed RV
INNER JOIN
tbl_ForSale FS
ON RV.ID = FS.ID
)
ON C.ID = FS.Category_ID
LEFT JOIN
tbl_CoverSpecial CS
ON RV.ID = CS.ID
WHERE CS.ID IS NULL
AND FS.Active = 1
ORDER BY Date_Viewed ASC;
Thanks Billy and Michael (and Kevin). After some trial and error I
managed to stumble upon solution (the outer join gave me results but
not the expected set).
cfquery name=qGetRecentRecord datasource=#request.dsn#
SELECT TOP 1
RV.ID AS Rec_ID
,RV.Date_Viewed
,FS.ID
WHERE NOT EXISTS should also work.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Mark Henderson shadefro...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings from the chilly south,
I have this query and it returns the expected result set, but I can't
work out how to use a join instead of the NOT IN clause and I *know*
that
Brian Kotek wrote:
WHERE NOT EXISTS should also work.
Yes it does, and I knew about that method when using NOT IN, as it was
a simple change to my original working query. What I didn't know, but
now do after some googling, is that NOT EXISTS means it uses an index
in the subquery as opposed
Basically, the cfset sqlToRun = ... / is kind of redundant and
negates the benefit of the cfquery tag. Put all you SQL inside the
cfquery tag. cfqueryparam is only valid within cfquery tags.
Dominic
2009/6/28 Jason Slack applesl...@gmail.com:
CF 8.01 OS X.
I have:
cfset sqlToRun = INSERT
[mailto:watson.domi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:22 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Help
Basically, the cfset sqlToRun = ... / is kind of redundant and
negates the benefit of the cfquery tag. Put all you SQL inside the
cfquery tag. cfqueryparam is only valid within cfquery
it's not good practice in ColdFusion to do this.
I don't agree with that : sometimes you have to do multiple updates, inserts or
else at the same time, depending on your process and some conditions; instead
of doing multiple cfquery (and thus multiple db connections), it is sometimes
cool
As Dominic said, putting the entire sql statement in as a variable in
ColdFusion isn't necessary.
Please, there IS a very good reason one would put an SQL statement in a
variable:
when using some tool to generate build queries for instance.
I have many examples in my own CMS, like a report
And with preserveSingleQuotes() you have to hope you're better at
cleaning input than hackers are at writing SQL injection. And yes, we
all know you're totally awesome at it; this response is for others
who'd rather not make that bet.
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
[mailto:s...@emakina.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:55 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Help
it's not good practice in ColdFusion to do this.
I don't agree with that : sometimes you have to do multiple updates, inserts
or else at the same time, depending on your process and some conditions
And with preserveSingleQuotes() you have to hope you're better at
cleaning input than hackers are at writing SQL injection.
When I'm talking about a CMS, I'm talking about some tool some customers
have paid for
and that is only accessible by approved users with authentication.
Now if they want
There's no reason you need a variable to do multiple updates in a
single query statement. You can still put the SQL inside the query
tags and, as you say, separate the statements with a semi-colon.
Scott
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Stephane Vantroyens...@emakina.com wrote:
I don't agree
just use a stored proc and feed in the name.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brady [mailto:dsbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:52 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Help
There's no reason you need a variable to do multiple updates in a
single query statement. You can still put
When I'm talking about a CMS, I'm talking about some tool some customers
have paid for and that is only accessible by approved users with
authentication.
Now if they want to hack and sabotage their own application they have
paid for, it's their problem, and if it ever happens, they will pay
Sure, as long as the CMS has no XSS attack points...
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2009/6/30 Claude Schneegans schneeg...@internetique.com:
And with preserveSingleQuotes() you have to hope you're better at
cleaning input than hackers are at
Internal security problems are far more common than external ones.
Within a large organization, not all users may be trustworthy.
C'mon, if they are users and they have access to the system, if they go
crazy,
do they really need SQL injection to harm the system ?
They can simply delete all
With SQL injection they can delete what they don't have access to.
With XSS they can do that while making it look like someone else did
it.
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2009/6/30 Claude Schneegans schneeg...@internetique.com:
Internal
With XSS they can do that while making it look like someone else did it.
Probably, but my clients barely know the difference between a computer
and a toaster,
and I spend more of my time explaining them that in order to press
Ctrl, they must find a key
on their keyboard with the letters Ctrl
Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:schneeg...@internetique.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: SQL Help
With XSS they can do that while making it look like someone else did it.
Probably, but my clients barely know the difference between a computer
If you don't take security in mind when writing
applications it's just a matter of time before
something bad happens.
I can't tell you how many times I've been contacted by people who have had
their site broken and need an emergency fix. I've made quite a bit of money
fixing other people's
Also, you talk about this like your speaking of only internal
applications
or applications that could never go on a production environment.
Indeed, we were talking about building SQL queries in a variable inside
a Content management system.
Of course, for parts of the site exposed to public,
C'mon, if they are users and they have access to the system, if they go
crazy,
do they really need SQL injection to harm the system ?
They can simply delete all what they have access to, they can replace
content by porn, whatever.
Will CFQURYPARAM protect your application against that ?
CF 8.01 OS X.
I have:
cfset sqlToRun = INSERT INTO personalevent(eventid, userid, username,
eventdate) VALUES(#FORM.eventidentity#, #FORM.whois#, '#FORM.juser#',
'#FORM.eventdate#')
cfoutput #sqlToRun# /cfoutput
cfquery name=addpersonaleventtome
if you're going to be generating your SQL like that, you'll need to wrap
your final variable in preserveSingleQuotes().
so...
cfquery name=addpersonaleventtome datasource=cf_WikiData
#preserveSingleQuotes(sqlToRun)#
/cfquery
it will be pointed out to you (possibly before I even finish
Right I am switching everything to cfqueryparam as I read about SQL injection.
Do you see my Invalid CFML construct found on line 22 at column 120.
above though? I still dont.
-Jason
if you're going to be generating your SQL like that, you'll need to wrap
your final variable in
A) Always use cfqueryparam/. (Note the period.)
B) When in doubt, use cfqueryparam/ anyways. (Note the period.)
C) While preserveSingleQuotes() can be a useful tool at times, I would have
a very difficult time thinking of a time where I would use it.
D) Always use cfqueryparam/. (Note again,
Hello there,
I do appreciate this isn't the right forum for posting this question but I have
posted my question in the SQL forum but I haven't heard anything back. It's a
very straightforward query... at least I hope it is for someone with good sql
skills.
I was hoping someone could help
Just answered this on the SQL list:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/sql/thread.cfm/threadid:855
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
I'm really greatful to you for the post.
Just answered this on the SQL list:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/sql/thread.cfm/threadid:855
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
I've got a table (MySQL) with about 20k records. I'd like to be able to get all
fields from the table with distinct email addresses. Essentially, I'm weeding
out records with duplicate email addresses.
What I'm trying does not work:
SELECT mytable.lastname, mytable.firstname, mytable.city,
Assuming your PK is named customerID you can do the following:
SELECT mytable.lastname, mytable.firstname, mytable.city, mytable.state
FROM mytable
WHERE mytable.customerID in (select min(customerID) from mytable group by email)
There is at least one problem in your query. The in () statement is
#br
br
/cfoutput
/cfloop
Check that output and see if that's what you're looking for...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jeff F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Help
I've got a table (MySQL
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Jeff F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a table (MySQL) with about 20k records. I'd like to be able to get
all fields from the table with distinct email addresses. Essentially, I'm
weeding out records with duplicate email addresses.
What I'm trying does not
# #state#br
br
/cfoutput
/cfloop
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL Help
To view all your records with duplicate email addresses,
you might try something like
Jim,
At first glance that seems to work, however the recordcounts appear to be off.
What I did was a simple query to find the total number of distinct email
addresses:
SELECT distinct mytable.email
FROM mytable
I get 19588 as a recordcount.
When I run
SELECT mytable.lastname,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Jeff F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SELECT distinct mytable.email
FROM mytable
I get 19588 as a recordcount.
This number would include email addresses that are duplicated in the
table (but only a count of 1 for each distinct address).
SELECT
Thanks Jim. Now I see.
I guess what I'm looking for would be something like this then:
SELECT mytable.lastname,mytable.email
FROM mytable GROUP BY mytable.email HAVING distinct(mytable.email)
Which of course does not work. When there are records with duplicate emails
addresses, I need
Are the other fields in your table the same when the email is the same?
Meaning, are the records really duplicate? Or is it just the email that is
duplicate and the other fields may have varying values for two rows that
have the same email? If they do vary, do you care which of the duplicate
rows
When there are records with duplicate
emails addresses, I need to include one of them.
So you are trying to display one record for each email address?
You could try something like this. Not tested, but the idea is to select a
single PK for each email. Then use a JOIN to display the details
You could try something like this. Not tested, but the idea is to
select a single PK for each email. Then use a JOIN to display the
details for those PK's.
Note, the previous query assumes it does not matter which record is returned.
The records are from contest entries. People can only enter with one email
address. Some people entered multiple times, using the same email address.
I need to get a record set used to pick a winner, including just one of the
records from the duplicate email entries.
I need to get a record set used to pick a winner, including just one
of the records from the duplicate email entries.
If it does not matter which one, try the query I posted in my first response.
The syntax is not tested, but it has the right concept.
The records are from contest entries. People can only enter with one email
address. Some people entered multiple times, using the same email address.
I need to get a record set used to pick a winner, including just one of the
records from the duplicate email entries.
The records are from contest entries. People can only enter with one email
address. Some people entered multiple times, using the same email address.
So, why all the complexity with joins and subqueries? Just...
SELECT DISTINCT email FROM sometable
then pick a winner from the list of
It also begs the question, if they were only supposed to have one
entry
per e-mail address, why wasn't there error checking or a constraint on
the table to force this in the first place?
True enough. I was thinking the same thing myself ;-)
ok i go it i think
but it just looks so weird to me..
it looks back wards but works...
SELECT DISTINCT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.V_riprod_ZMATMAST.sap_partnum AS NEQnumb
FROM dbo.V_riprod_ZMATMAST LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.V_riprod_Specs_ZMATMAST_EQ ON
ok i have 2 views
V_riprod_ZMATMAST returns 60 records
V_riprod_Specs_ZMATMAST_EQ returns 39 records or so that are matched
in another table.
these i will do an update on
problem i am having is the NEQ
i am trying to use the view below to return all the results of the
records that don't match.
products.brand_id = brands.brand_id
AND products.product_id = upsell.product_id
AND products.product_id in (20,21)
ORDER BY upsell.upsell_sort ASC,
brands.brand_name ASC,
products.product_item ASC
And what's with the... sql help!!
Sounds like you're goin' down on the titanic
= upsell.product_id
AND products.product_id in (20,21)
ORDER BY upsell.upsell_sort ASC,
brands.brand_name ASC,
products.product_item ASC
And what's with the... sql help!!
Sounds like you're goin' down on the titanic
ok i need to put Upsell items underneath the add upsell items form, so that
they can see what upsell products they currently have for that product.
(mysql 5 btw)
So it is all good but then they asked for me to make it sort-able and that is
causing me a headache and can't quite get that last
I'm having a weird query issue with SQL server...
The following query inserts two rows into the query_results
table:
insert into ENQUIRE.dbo.QUERY_RESULTS ( QUERYID, ENTITY_ID )
SELECT DISTINCT 1933 AS QUERYID, A.ENTITY_ID
FROM BIOTAB1
Hello,
It's been a wile since I have had to do much in the way of SQL queries and
I need some help.
I have a table called installs that looks like this
HostName, iDate, Package
client1, 2007-06-01, Update1
client1, 2007-06-01, Update2
client1, 2007-06-01, Update3
client1, 2007-06-02, Update5
only. (syntax depends on your DB).
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Help, please ...
Hello,
It's been a wile since I have had to do much in the way of SQL queries
and
I need some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HostName, iDate, Package
client1, 2007-06-01, Update1
client1, 2007-06-01, Update2
client1, 2007-06-01, Update3
client1, 2007-06-02, Update5
client1, 2007-06-02, NewApp
client2, 2007-06-01, Update1
client2, 2007-06-01, Update2
client2, 2007-06-01, Update3
Heck, I did up a special page just to explain my needs better. :)
http://wtomlinson.com/eval.html
been flailing away at this for quite a while now...
Thanks,
Will
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales marketing dashboard
Ok, I have one last query to get right in my eval app.
Here's my schema: http://wtomlinson.com/evalschema.gif
Jim has been kind enough to help work out my queries. Now, I just need to
rollup my rankings questions and I'm done (mostly).
The data looks like this:
tblquestions:
Rank these
Subject: Re: SQL Help - Answered
I'm going to have to look at something. I'm still not getting what I
anticipated.
There are over 3700 records of which 1775 of them are distinct values
for RATE. However, I am only getting values of 1 for COUNT(DISTINCT
rate) as rateCount. I
Why do the first two queries work and the last one fail? The only difference is
adding the comma and additional field to the SELECT statement.
cfquery datasource=myDSN name=Rates
SELECT count(DISTINCT rate) as rateCount
FROMmyrates
WHERE my_code = 385 and year = 2005
ORDER BY rate
You need a group by in your query..
SELECT count(DISTINCT rate) as rateCount, rate
FROMmyrates
WHERE my_code = 385 and year = 2005
GROUP BY rate
ORDER BY rate
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do the first two queries work and the last one fail? The only
Thank you
Greg Morphis wrote:
You need a group by in your query..
SELECT count(DISTINCT rate) as rateCount, rate
FROMmyrates
WHERE my_code = 385 and year = 2005
GROUP BY rate
ORDER BY rate
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do the
No problem, if you want to know why take a look at aggregate
functions, which is what count is, as well as others..
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you
Greg Morphis wrote:
You need a group by in your query..
SELECT count(DISTINCT rate) as rateCount, rate
I'm going to have to look at something. I'm still not getting what I
anticipated.
There are over 3700 records of which 1775 of them are distinct values
for RATE. However, I am only getting values of 1 for COUNT(DISTINCT
rate) as rateCount. I was trying to find out how many records are
can you provide a sample of your data and the way your table is
designed (column name, type)?
Thanks
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to have to look at something. I'm still not getting what I
anticipated.
There are over 3700 records of which 1775 of them are
that and see if you're any closer to what you want.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: SQL Help - Answered
I'm going to have to look at something. I'm still
Put every field from the select that is not an aggregate in your
group by and you get something understandable.
Jochem
Jochem,
I did this and it still gives me incorrect results. It gives me a count of 1
for each answer, no matter what the answer is. I'm just testing with one
evaluation
.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2007 10:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Need More SQL help - DRIVING ME NUTS!
Put every field from the select that is not an aggregate in your
group by and you get something understandable.
Jochem
Jochem,
I
No been following this thread, but can you do the first two parts?
Yes, I've got this part working with Jochem's fine SQL.
What about the third part?
With each possible answer, show me a count of the ones that were selected
Nope
Do those then try to combine them.
Adrian
This is where the
Three things I noted...
1. There are a lot of duplicated columns in the result list...I removed
those to make it easier to read and debug
2. It looks to me like tblevalanswerresults needs to be joined to both
tblquestions and tblanswers...see below
3. When you join on tblEvaluations like you did
Thanks a ton Jim! I'll give it a shot later today and let you know the results.
Thanks!
Will
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7
Flex 2
Free Trial
Ok Jim, this is getting the results I'm after.
The counts are correct, everything looks right so far. I just needta test it
some more.
Would you please email me offlist?
WT at WTOMLINSON.com
Thanks a ton dude!
Will
~|
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Show me a list of questions
SELECT ...
FROM tblquestions
all possible evaluation answers for each question
SELECT ...
FROM
tblquestions
INNER JOIN
tblanswersets USING (answerSetID)
INNER JOIN
tblanswers USING
Does this make sense?
If you join this to some table with instructors you should get what you
need.
Jochem
Yes Jochem. I'm remote right now, but I'll give this a shot later today and
let'cha know how it turns out.
Thanks a ton dude!
Will
Jochem,
Do all these individual queries go into one query, separated with a ; ?
Thanks,
Will
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7
Flex 2
Free Trial
select *
from (
SELECT ...
FROM tblquestions
) questions,
(
SELECT ...
FROM
tblquestions
INNER JOIN
tblanswersets USING (answerSetID)
INNER JOIN
tblanswers USING (answerID)
) answers,
(
SELECT
A.answerID,
COUNT(EAR.answerID)
FROM
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Do all these individual queries go into one query, separated with a ; ?
Just run the last one, the others are to show how you build it step by step.
Jochem
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Do all these individual queries go into one query, separated with a ; ?
Just run the last one, the others are to show how you build it step by step.
duhh.. :)
Thanks Jochem!
Will
~|
ColdFusion
Jochem, this is close but not quite giving me the results I'm after.
Here's the data as it looks in the table. I answered three questions, each had
a choice of 5 answers. I chose 1 answer for each question.
Here's the data as it appears in the tblEvalAnswerResults many table.
I may have figured it out...
I used this for my group by.
GROUP BY Q.questionID, A.answerID
Still needta test it more tho but my results are lookin better.
Thanks Jochem!
Will
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales
Ok, I ALMOST got it! The results that are incorrect is just the number of
answers per question.
Here's what the query returns:
http://wtomlinson.com/evalQRYs/qryData.jpg
Look at numAnswers. I completed two evaluations. But numAnswers should be the
total count of each answer that was given.
Ok, I'm really close on this. I've been workin on it for hours, changing
queries, not gettin the results I need.
I filled out one survey of 3 questions, each question has 5 possible answers.
Here's the query:
SELECT
Q.questionID,
Q.questionsetID,
Q.question,
Q.answersetid,
ARS.answersetid,
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
