>> That country set looked suspicious so I googled
registering+only+mode+is+ON
Thanks Jen. I tried searching for the URL variables but came up empty. I
assumed that whatever it was that was generating the requests was using
proxies but couldn't make sense of what it's purpose was. The domain o
That country set looked suspicious so I googled registering+only+mode+is+ON
The top results were at a blackhat seo site, so I googled the tool
mentioned there. It's a bot trying to post spam to forums.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRumer
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, UXB wrote:
>
> Does anyo
Does anyone know or have a clue as to what is generating these requests?
/index.cfm?fid=2889Result:+used+x_fields.txt;+chosen
+nickname+%22pn49o0w5bs%22;+registered+%28registering+only+mode+is+ON%29;
They are coming from various IP's in Europe, southeast Asia, Ukraine and
I would suggest you log the responses you get back from the cfhttp request
which may tell you if there is a problem.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:32 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
>
> I have a little utility I run on my dev box which calls data-fetching
> processes on my production box. Usually works gr
Good idea. I'll check...
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Byron Mann wrote:
>
> It sounds like maybe the first cfhttp call from the client is ending with
> maybe a 500 error at the production.com URI and not really returning a
> response to the client. In that instance I can see the first ite
It sounds like maybe the first cfhttp call from the client is ending with
maybe a 500 error at the production.com URI and not really returning a
response to the client. In that instance I can see the first iteration in
the client side loop just stalling, while on the end point side, Fusion
Reacto
> Right. Usually, it runs serially just fine. With this production URL, it
> behaves in the way I described.
I would then assume that this production URL is taking much longer to complete.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
1-202-527-9569
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig
Right. Usually, it runs serially just fine. With this production URL, it
behaves in the way I described.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > I have a little utility I run on my dev box which calls data-fetching
> > processes on my production box. Usually works great:
> >
>
> I have a little utility I run on my dev box which calls data-fetching
> processes on my production box. Usually works great:
>
>
> http://production.com/?Date=#DateFormat(DateAdd('d', i,
> now()), 'm/d/')#">
>
>
> But now I have it pointed at a different process and here's what happens:
>
I have a little utility I run on my dev box which calls data-fetching
processes on my production box. Usually works great:
http://production.com/?Date=#DateFormat(DateAdd('d', i,
now()), 'm/d/')#">
But now I have it pointed at a different process and here's what happens:
1. I tell util
That would explain it Steve, thanks :)
Turns out that when the client asked for all the functionality they didn't
need it. Now all they want is to upload, view and delete so I can build a
pretty simple page in CF for that. Problem solved.
On 10 May 2013 13:14, DURETTE, STEVEN J wrote:
>
> Ed
Ed,
This is most likely due to the fact that directoryList is now a built in
function in ColdFusion 10. It doesn't seem to have the same inputs as the
function that you are using.
Steve
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
t; Use the third argument to specify query and you should be fine.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Edward Chanter
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm using the CFM filemanager, it's an old piece of code but has worked
> > great until now. It's not sup
should be fine.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Edward Chanter wrote:
>
> I'm using the CFM filemanager, it's an old piece of code but has worked
> great until now. It's not supported any more and I've encountered a weird
> problem after migrating from CF
I'm using the CFM filemanager, it's an old piece of code but has worked
great until now. It's not supported any more and I've encountered a weird
problem after migrating from CF8 to CF10
I'm getting an error after a directoryList()
The code in question is:
the error
When did those errors occur, was it at the time u were restarting the cf
instance, or were the errors showing before you did the restart, during the
time everything seemed slow.
Regards
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting for developers
www.cfsearch.com - CF
So .. running CF9 enterprise on Windows, in a 3 instance cluster with
FusionReactor monitoring.. we had an issue tonight (and this has happened
before) where one of the instances starts lagging badly and causes the
other instances to choke.. they're not really down but not much going on.
So I res
Hi,
I have written a CFX to perform a small task using iText. Code was compiled
with 1.5 java and uses the CFX.JAR file along with the iText jar files. The
module compiles correctly, and runs from a command line with NO problems. When
I installed thee module on the server (CF 9 Standard - Buil
Thanks for the insight James, I will definitely try that out.
On 26 February 2013 23:40, James Mc wrote:
>
> The 10k records entry is only for autocommit which means that as soon as
> your collections reaches 10k uncommitted docs it will commit them and then
> start queuing up more.
>
> What c
The 10k records entry is only for autocommit which means that as soon as your
collections reaches 10k uncommitted docs it will commit them and then start
queuing up more.
What could be happening is that you have more than 10k but less than 20k
documents which would leave these documents uncom
I did more digging into the Solr config XML for my collection, and found
this in the updateHandler:
1
That seems to allow me to index more documents.
Solr ended up not being able to do what I needed so I've used SQL full-text
indexing instead.
Just wanted to ask again
I'm trying to create a searchable index of database content using SOLR.
It's a really simple implementation. The problem is that it won't let me
index more that 10,000 rows of data. I can do 10k no problemo but as soon
as I try to increase the number I get an HTTP 500 error from IIS, not CF,
which
>>I found this somewhat related article.
Well, no it is not the same. This one seems to deal with an error when setting
the SRC attribute by Javascript, which is not what I'm doing.
Whet I have is a page like "myPage.cfm" which has an >Article does not mention it, but I believe the (with whic
I found this somewhat related article.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11935458/ie9-bug-iframe-misbehaving-due-to-url-sensitivity
Article does not mention it, but I believe the (with whichever
IE mode you wind up with) has to be the first meta tag and must be in
the .
Bit more on X-UA-Comp
>> it looks like you need a space between
mondossier.cfm and type=#type#
No, type here is a parameter in the url, not an attribute for http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:353
If this is exact code, it looks like you need a space between
mondossier.cfm and type=#type#
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, <> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> One of my customers is having a very weird problem with an IFRAME in my
> site.
> Here is the code in file mondossier.c
>>Is it possible the IFrame src is getting redirected to the "root"
It would be if the file is not found, but the file exists and it works with all
other browsers, including IE8.
Only IE9 seems to have trouble.
And if it was redirectected, there would be a trace of it in the HTTP logs
For insta
Is it possible the IFrame src is getting redirected to the "root"
because the user is not logged in?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:14 PM, <> wrote:
>
> >>Try ./file.cfm
>
> Ok, I tried, but it makes no difference.
>
>
>
~|
Order
>>Try ./file.cfm
Ok, I tried, but it makes no difference.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/gr
Think I ran into this before with relative paths without '/'
Try ./file.cfm
Byron Mann
Lead Engineer & Architect
HostMySite.com
On Dec 13, 2012 2:14 PM, <> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> One of my customers is having a very weird problem with an IFRAME in my
> site.
> Here
Hi,
One of my customers is having a very weird problem with an IFRAME in my site.
Here is the code in file mondossier.cfm:
type is blank
With all browsers, including my own Explorer it works perfectly.
This is the trace how it look in tje server log when the page works normaly:
GET 575
Hmmm. One of my sites also had this exact attack (and some variations tried
about a dozen times) yesterday also.
Robert Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin & Williams
Advertising I Branding I Digital I Direct
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100 I Hauppauge, NY 11788
T 631.231.6600
Looks like the same attack tried my servers too - too bad for them it failed.
Long Live CFQueryParam amongst other little tools. Oh, and running PostgreSQL
database :-)
Wil Genovese
Sr. Web Application Developer/
Systems Administrator
CF Webtools
www.cfwebtools.com
wilg...@trunkful.com
www.tr
Just battled this today myself
Here's some more information on it.
https://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=12127
On 9/30/12 5:58 PM, "Les Mizzell" wrote:
>
>Never seen this before! Script in Application file, as usual, caught it
>before it got further...
>
>Here's what was tried:
>
>
>/inde
Never seen this before! Script in Application file, as usual, caught it
before it got further...
Here's what was tried:
/index.cfm?action=dance.school%29%29%2F%2A%2A%2For%2F%2A%2A%2F1%3D%40%40version--40version--=&MSOTlPn_View=0&MSOTlPn_ShowSettings=False%27%2F%2A%2A%2For%2F%2A%2A%2F1%3D%40%40
Yeah.. It was changed for me. Just needed to flush the DNS cache..
Stupid mistake, but I haven't had my coffee yet. :)
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Phillip Duba wrote:
>
> Remember, it could take up to 48 hours for DNS changes to propagate. We had
> a site in which we changed hosts and it to
Remember, it could take up to 48 hours for DNS changes to propagate. We had
a site in which we changed hosts and it took that long for everyone to see
the changes (since we didn't control the TTL refresh rate). HTH,
Phil
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Phillip Vector wrote:
>
> Nevermind.. *fac
its working fine for me, did you actually check the DNS locally using ping
or something and see where it was resolving ?
most likely you have a dns caching issue or have not allowed sufficient
time for propagation.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Phillip Vector wrote:
>
> So I own the domain 5t
Nevermind.. *facepalm*
ipconfig /flushDNS
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Phillip Vector
wrote:
> So I own the domain 5thWallGaming.com
>
> I updated the DNS and since my subdomain is working, I know it's on
> the new host. Also, FTP is pinging the new site...
>
> But everytime I go to www.5
So I own the domain 5thWallGaming.com
I updated the DNS and since my subdomain is working, I know it's on
the new host. Also, FTP is pinging the new site...
But everytime I go to www.5thWallGaming.com, I get the "We are
updating" message (the old site).
Any ideas on what I could be missing?
~~
On 12/1/2011 2:18 AM, DURETTE, STEVEN J wrote:
> I have a stored procedure that when I run from SSMS it runs perfectly and
> returns 2000 rows. When I run it from a cfstoredproc tag it returns no rows
seen something somewhat similar w/sql server 2008 & datadirect drivers but this
was always w/s
my memory is a little hazy on the subject, but I do recall some odd
issues like this with cfstoredproc.
Are you using cfstoredprocparam ?
if so, make sure you pass the params in in the exact same order as
they are defined in the stored proc itself, if I recall this is one of
the causes of such beh
If you run the profiler and it says that it is returning the correct
number of records in the sp that was run, you could also take a look
at FusionReactor and use their JDBC wrappers to see if something is
going on at the JDBC level.
Judah
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Leigh wrote:
>
> Othe
Other than that the only thing I can think of would be tracing it or using the
profiler to see what is happening.at a db level. Because it does not make sense
the same parameters would return different results.
-Leigh
~|
Order
I checked, everything is exactly the same for both calls. Yes we do set NOCOUNT
ON.
Yes it returns the proper columns just no data.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Leigh [mailto:cfsearch...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:51 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Weird SQL Query
> don't return the same record set.
Hm.. on second thought I may have read that wrong. If the resultset you are
getting back contains the correct column names just no records - then ignore my
comment about NOCOUNT. It does not apply.
-Leigh
~~
Anything unusual about the procedure like optional parameters?
(I know you said the input values are exactly the same, but ...) did you
compare the debug information from cfquery and cfstoredproc? Just to verify
everything truly is the same (values, data types, parameter position).
Another
Nope one record set. It just seems strange that exec
myStoredProc and (a lot left out for brevity) don't
return the same record set.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:28 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re:
Is it returning multiple recordsets perhaps? Or possibly returning a
cursor to the recordset?
Judah
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, DURETTE, STEVEN J wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a little background... CF: ColdFusion Server Enterprise 8,0,1,195765
> SQL: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2
>
> I h
Hi all,
Here is a little background... CF: ColdFusion Server Enterprise 8,0,1,195765
SQL: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2
I have a stored procedure that when I run from SSMS it runs perfectly and
returns 2000 rows. When I run it from a cfstoredproc tag it returns no rows at
all. I just changed th
Thanks for the information Pete. I appreciate your response.
Matt
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusio
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Matt Blatchley wrote:
>
> I've never used Fuseguard before, looks pretty good though. Any
> experience with the customizations? It says fully customizable, but
> is it all done via code, or a GUI?
Hi Matt,
Just wanted to provide some more details on how custom
In addition to ids/ips one could consider an application firewall.
On Nov 23, 2011 7:48 PM, "Justin Scott" wrote:
>
>
> > What I mean is that cfqueryparam will not protect you against
> > attacks, il will just prevent attacks to be succesful.
>
> Well, that's mostly the point.
>
> > A better app
Found it, very cool. I've been using older anti-SQL Injection scripts
and blocking IP's, which is a pain in the arse to manage over a long
period of time.
This should help save me time from having to worry too much about that now.
~~~
it is all done via config files, but it pretty straightforward.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Matt Blatchley wrote:
>
> I've never used Fuseguard before, looks pretty good though. Any
> experience with the customizations? It says fully customizable, but
> is it all done via code, or a GUI?
I've never used Fuseguard before, looks pretty good though. Any
experience with the customizations? It says fully customizable, but
is it all done via code, or a GUI?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amaz
Software
>> 902-401-7689
>> http://www.webenergy.ca
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@whichfranchise.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:13 AM
>> To: cf-talk
>> Subject: Re: Weird attack
>>
>>
>>
]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:13 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Weird attack
>
>
> On 24/11/2011 11:10, Russ Michaels wrote:
>> or give Fuseguard a try
>>
>> http://foundeo.com/security/
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pa
ve an antivirus. Good
luck.
Kind Regards,
Rick Sanders
Webenergy Software
902-401-7689
http://www.webenergy.ca
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@whichfranchise.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:13 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Weird attack
On 24/11/2011 11:10, Russ Mic
On 24/11/2011 11:10, Russ Michaels wrote:
> or give Fuseguard a try
>
> http://foundeo.com/security/
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Paul Stewart
> wrote:
>> On 18/11/2011 16:57, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving reque
or give Fuseguard a try
http://foundeo.com/security/
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2011 16:57, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving requests in which a string
>> like "/**/or/**/1=@@version)-
On 18/11/2011 16:57, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving requests in which a string
> like "/**/or/**/1=@@version)--" is added in the URL.
>
> Has someone any idea what this guy is actually trying to do ?
>
>
~~
> What I mean is that cfqueryparam will not protect you against
> attacks, il will just prevent attacks to be succesful.
Well, that's mostly the point.
> A better approach is to check for a couple of key words like ...
In other words, deploy an IDS/IPS system in front of your web
application to
>>The cfqueryparam tag doesn't care where data comes from
What I mean is that cfqueryparam will not protect you against attacks, il will
just prevent attacks to be succesful.
A better approach is to check for a couple of key words like
user
declare
script
@@
exec,... (provided you don't use the
> If your template is not using URL parameters in a query,
> cfqueryparam wont help.
The cfqueryparam tag doesn't care where data comes from and works just
as well on data imported from a CSV or XML file as it does on form,
url, or cgi scope variables that the end-user can control. Aside from
en
It is actually very difficult to change an application's rendered output,
like in the case of obtaining version information. It is much easier to
inject comparisons and see if the template continues to execute, and that
would verify their inquiry. You are right an attacker that is just blanket
a
>>If your site returned what they wanted, in this case SQL server
version information
Ok, I see. In my case, I doubt the 403 error they get in return will help them
a lot ;-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http:/
SQL Injection attacks are usually just one little possibility an attacker
tries as fast and as many places as they can hoping one of them will give
up the goods.
That one in particular looks like they are banking on forcing their own
parameterized query input comparison.
If they can break your q
>>Good old cfqueryparam has been working like a charm!
If your template is not using URL parameters in a query, cfqueryparam wont help.
And if the parameter is text, the scrap will get into your database as well.
Happily, my moron trap is more general. ;-)
~~
select @@VERSION does not work with PostgreSQL. This is the DB I use for all
my sites.
I scrub ALL data input, varchar fields get run through several scrubbers in my
code. The one I am seeing this on are integer fields and I have cfqueryparam
datatypes sets. Thus integers are scrubbed withou
this is SQL Injection.
most hackers will first use a simple URL hack like this to identify
vulnerable websites, their bot will collect the response and flag the
ones that gave back the required response.
If your site returned what they wanted, in this case SQL server
version information, then they
> MS SQL Server (@@VERSION).
Btw: MySQL supports @@VERSION too.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.co
I do not know about the whole expression. But a few references mentioned using
1=@@version) to trigger an error disclosing the database version. The @@version
variable works in MySQL and MS SQL, maybe others.
-Leigh
~|
Order
Ah.. Thank you.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Aaron wrote:
>
> That is an attempted SQL Injection. @@VERSION returns all the goodies you
> would expect, and offers information an attacker might be able to use to
> better expoit.
>
> MS SQL Server @@VERSION:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/
> Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving requests in which a string
> like "/**/or/**/1=@@version)--" is added in the URL.
I would guess it's targeting MS SQL Server (@@VERSION). Beyond that,
I'd guess it's intended to identify vulnerable web apps using SQL
Server and perhaps measure ti
That is an attempted SQL Injection. @@VERSION returns all the goodies you
would expect, and offers information an attacker might be able to use to
better expoit.
MS SQL Server @@VERSION:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms177512(v=SQL.90).aspx
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Wil Geno
Well, if it wasn't cfqueryparam, I don't see any issues in the SQL
that would cause ... anything.
Am I missing something here? If it wasn't scrubbed, what would it do?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Wil Genovese wrote:
>
> No clue what they are after, but I have been seeing that in my error
No clue what they are after, but I have been seeing that in my error
notification alerts the week. Good old cfqueryparam has been working like a
charm!
Wil Genovese
Sr. Web Application Developer/
Systems Administrator
CF Webtools
www.cfwebtools.com
wilg...@trunkful.com
www.trunkful.com
On
I've gotten those as well. It appears he's using a proxy or it's a
worm as it's traced to Germany and PA in the states.
No clue as to what it's trying to accomplish.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:57 AM, <> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving requests in which a string
Hi,
Since a few days, I have all my sites receiving requests in which a string like
"/**/or/**/1=@@version)--" is added in the URL.
Has someone any idea what this guy is actually trying to do ?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion An
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:42 PM, kbutte...@yahoo.com kbutte...@yahoo.com <
kbutte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a screen-scraper app, and I have a site that has an
> disclaimer front page. You have to click on the "I understand" button and
> then you are redirected to the i
> Do I need to grab that session ID manually? I thought I might have to do
> that so I have tried to set redirect="false", but I can't get the session ID
> returned in the header
You will need to read the cookies and send them on subsequent
requests. The ASP.NET session ID is almost certainly a
To clarify the below post, when I try to get the cookie by setting
redirect="false" in my cfhttp call, I get an error and the message from cfcatch
is " 302 Moved Temporarily "
So that's why I can't get the cookie.
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a screen-scraper app, and I have a site that has
Hi all,
I am working on a screen-scraper app, and I have a site that has an disclaimer
front page. You have to click on the "I understand" button and then you are
redirected to the inspections page that I need to get to.
I can get to the disclaimer page, but I cannot get cfhttp to get past th
have you upgraded your database server recently.
ISTR that you have to use scope_identity on SQL2008 and the old reference no
longer works.
Russ
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Brian Polackoff wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever run into "identitycol" is undefined while using the result
> attribute in
Has anyone ever run into "identitycol" is undefined while using the result
attribute in a cfquery while using cf8 enterprise on a windows 2k8 and a SQL
2005 server?
This problem started on Sunday in our production environment. We have rebooted
the database server and the web servers with no ef
> Did you ever resolve this? I'm getting it now on an MX 7 installation when I
> try to access the administrator page. It's a Virtual Private Server and I
> bet some config change was made that screwed up the encryption. May have to
> reinstall and reconfigure ColdFusion -- ugh! Bob Mack
>
>
have you just done an update by any chance ?
try loading the cfadministrator
Russ
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Robert Mack wrote:
>
> >500 coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._setCurrentLineNo(I)V
> >coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._setCurrentLineNo(I)V
> >
> >anyone ever see this before?
> >
> >tw
Did you ever resolve this? I'm getting it now on an MX 7 installation when I
try to access the administrator page. It's a Virtual Private Server and I bet
some config change was made that screwed up the encryption. May have to
reinstall and reconfigure ColdFusion -- ugh! Bob Mack
>500 cold
>500 coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._setCurrentLineNo(I)V
>coldfusion.runtime.CfJspPage._setCurrentLineNo(I)V
>
>anyone ever see this before?
>
>tw
>
>--
>'Never have anything in your life that you can't walk out on in thirty
>seconds flat, if you spot the heat coming around the corner'
>
>robert d
Hello All.
I went to great lengths to research any kind of way to prevent the fckEditor
from stripping or changing tags.
I modified the fckconfig.js file with the following which works great in
Firefox:
FCKConfig.ProtectedSource.Add( /<%[\s\S]*?%>/g ) ; // ASP style server
side code <%.
Ok, so I am hoping someone out there has some kind of insight on this issue as
I cannot find anything on this.
We are having an issue with CF9 with images not printing. We do a ton of pdf
generation each day, and right now have a clients code updated to cf9. Its very
simple code, and below is
< = "before"
Try WHERE last_attempt > #DateAdd('n',15,Now())#;
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Robert Harrison wrote:
>
> This creates my time (SQL Insert):
>
>SET last_attempt=#CreateODBCTime(Now())#
>
> This is the query to get (after 15 minutes have passed):
>
>WHERE la
This creates my time (SQL Insert):
SET last_attempt=#CreateODBCTime(Now())#
This is the query to get (after 15 minutes have passed):
WHERE last_attempt < #DateAdd('n',15,Now())#;
But it's selecting all records regardless of the time.
What the heck?
Robert B. Harrison
On Wednesday 22 Jul 2009, Rob Barthle wrote:
> > Wasn't Application.cfc introduced in CF8, not 7 ?
> If that were the case, then I'd be having bigger problems... ;-)
Coffee failure, oops.
--
Helping to proactively compete essential cross-platform systems as part of the
IT team of the year, '09
> Wasn't Application.cfc introduced in CF8, not 7 ?
>
If that were the case, then I'd be having bigger problems... ;-)
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion m
On Tuesday 21 Jul 2009, Rob Barthle wrote:
> Background: I have a local CFMX7
...
> The Application.cfc file has things set up properly:
Wasn't Application.cfc introduced in CF8, not 7 ?
--
Helping to professionally entrench open-source convergence as part of the IT
team of the year, '09 and
>Perhaps with the direct domain name, you remove the ability to
>traverse up the directory tree to get at the application.cfc?
>Is the application.cfc in the same directory as the page you are calling?
>
>
Al, you are the man.
I set up the site directory name wrong compared to the working serve
>Perhaps with the direct domain name, you remove the ability to
>traverse up the directory tree to get at the application.cfc?
>Is the application.cfc in the same directory as the page you are calling?
>
>
Yes it is. As I said before, this exact setup works properly on another server
(only that
om) which points to a subdirectory of
>/www/CFAPPS/ on my server (like the other sites that work do), and I
>added a virtual host to Apache. It seems to have set up fine there,
>but I get a weird error when I try to access the site:
>
>==
&
1 - 100 of 1050 matches
Mail list logo