Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102010876826] MS-NLMP and V1 Signatuers without Extended Session Security

23 8a 2e 3b 4d 45 7f b8 01 00 00 00 45 c8 44 e5 09 dc d1 df 2e 45 9d 36 I’ll file a document bug to add the concatenation in the algorithm in section 3.4.3. Please let me know if it does not answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your

[cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246.

Hi Chris: I have created a case to track this issue. A member of the protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120610062311] Questions about Unsecure Join (old-style join domain)

Hi Gordon: Thanks for contacting Microsoft. A member of the team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges

Hi David: I have created a case to track this issue. A member of the open specification team will be in touch to further assist you soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response

to reflect the behavior more clearly. Please let me know if this does not answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response

Hi David: I'll help you with this issue and would be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Please send me the network trace of the behavior you are observing. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response

Hi David: Thanks for the trace. I am looking into it. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com -Original Message

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112062456011515] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs

Hi Andrew: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112051046226036] Windows 2008 R2 doesn’t return expiry on SMB2 expired sessions

question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:14 AM To: 'Stefan

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

Hi Jeff: Please let me know if my response answered your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

is implementation detail, not protocol. Please let me know if it answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

Hi Jeff: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx

Hi Matthieu: Yes, please send me the ttt traces and more details about the problem. Your email did not give me a good grasp of the issue. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx

Hi Matthieu: Yes, please send me the ttt traces and more details about the problem. Your email did not give me a good grasp of the issue. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

if it does not answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Obaid

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

Hi Chris: Thanks for pointing that out. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com -Original Message- From

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111112257588419] RE: - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: I'll look into that and get back to you when I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

Hi Chris: I'll help you with this issue and will get back to you as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

if it answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule

. If the value of first byte is 0x0F and the rest of the bytes are all zero, the schedule will open at 0:00 on Sunday and will close on 1:00AM on Sunday. Please let me know if it does not answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

Hi Matthieu: Is the dump for just the stage header or the whole PDU ( starting from COMM_BOP). The beginning 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 does not match any. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

Partner: The partner that receives change orders, files, and folders. Upstream Partner: The partner that sends out change orders, files, and folders. Please let me know if it answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

set up a file transfer space for this and will send you the latest version of the Time travel trace installation binary. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule

Hi Matthieu: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 2:35 AM To: Interoperability

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision

Hi Matthieu: I am trying to understand your question. Following is what I am having problem with. ...REQUEST_SEND packet sent from a server There is no REQUEST_SEND documented in MS-FRS1. Do you mean CMD_SEND_STAGE? Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision

to CO_IN.ChangeOrderGuid. CO_IN.ChangeOrderGuid is the change order guid that is sent in COMM_REMOTE_CO. In section 3.3.4.4.1 Common Details it is stated that CO_IN: P_IN.COMM_REMOTE_CO (The change order that is embedded in P_IN.) Please let me know if it does not answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data

Hi Matthieu: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with ss vs. ß

Hi Metze: Please let me know if my reply resolved your problem. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original

[cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091520687224 ] RE: MS-FRS1 precision

Hi Matthieu: Thanks for contacting Microsoft regarding your inquiry on MS-FRS1. A member of the protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with ss vs. ß

Hi Metze: Please let me know if my answer resolved your issue. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original

Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces

Hi Matthieu: From your reply, I can guess this issue is resolved now but I am not sure. Please conform if this issue is resolved or not. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with ss vs. ß

Hi Metze: Can you please let me know how you create User_ß and User_ss? Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with ss vs. ß

, August 11, 2011 1:17 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [REG:111080856926389] Nameconflict with ss vs. ß Hi Obaid, I believe by MS-DRDR you mean MS-DRSR. Yes, sorry. Can you please let me know where MS-DRSR is marked as historic

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: I am archiving this case. Please feel free to contact us if you want to revisit this issue. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: I was wondering if you got a chance to get a network trace of this behavior. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072568497582] clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS

Hi Matthieu: Please let me know if my response resolved your problem. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: I am still waiting for network traces for this behavior. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: In the response from DC, I see the following result_last_attempt : WERR_OK Whereas the title of your email says that Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA... Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111072877629207] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica

Hi Matthieu: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS

Hi Matthieu: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.

, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.mn.org] Sent

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [Pfif] [ttal...@microsoft.com: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original Message

Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

Hi Volker: The information you gave is sufficient. We are still working on it. I'll be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011

[cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.

. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original Message- From: ubiqx

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

Hi Volker: It looks like we need the trace to properly answer this question. I appreciate your help and understanding in this matter. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

Hi Volker: I'll try to debug and repro it based on the info you provided. Whenever you can repro it, please send me the traces. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

MUST fail the request with STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: RE: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

Hi Volker: I am still working on this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111052652308584] [ttal...@microsoft.com: RE: Reminder -- share secdesc and smb2 echo?]

Hi Volker: I will help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111020250601482] RE: Please provide windows behaviour notes on MS-KILE's reference to Referrals-11

Hi Andrew: Thank you for your feedback. I'll work with product group to have the original solution included in the document. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111020250601482] RE: Please provide windows behaviour notes on MS-KILE's reference to Referrals-11

Hi Andrew: Please let me know if the following document changes answer your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111020250601482] RE: Please provide windows behaviour notes on MS-KILE's reference to Referrals-11

canonicalization.” Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111020250601482] Please provide windows behaviour notes on MS-KILE's reference to Referrals-11

know it already, but I'll mention it just for completeness. I can login by using administra...@s4dom.net on WS2k3 client when KDC is Samba. I’ll update you as soon as I have the changes in the document. Please let me know if it answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer

[cifs-protocol] [REG: 111020250601482 ] RE: Please provide windows behaviour notes on MS-KILE's reference to Referrals-11

Hi Andrew: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:26 PM To: Interoperability

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111012761781621] Dirsync control

Hi Matthieu: Thank you for contacting Microsoft regarding your question about MS-DRSR. A member of protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110102774074009] description attribute in AD

. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:00 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [REG:110102774074009] description

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110102774074009] description attribute in AD

on a SAM-specific object (section 3.1.1.5.2.3), and results in more than one value in the attribute, then the modification fails with attributeOrValueExists / ERROR_DS_SINGLE_VALUE_CONSTRAINT” Please let me know if this answers your question. If it does, I’ll consider this issue resolved. Obaid

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110091558099846] Incompleteness in MS-SAMR section 3.1.1.8.1 objectClass

Hi Matthias: Thanks for contacting Microsoft regarding your issue with MS-SAMR. A member of protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer |Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210063056197932001] Need some clarification on the User-Change-Password access rights

Hi Nadya: My name is Obaid Farooqi and I'll be helping you with this issue. I'll be in touch as soon as I have anything concrete. Please feel free to contact me if you have a question/clarification. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft From: didr...@gmail.com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210050354365053003] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

Hi Matthieu: I'll update you when we have finished product. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 10:58 PM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: MSSolve Case Email

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210050354365053003] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

Hi Matthieu: You are correct. This PDF only has additions mentioned in this email. Do want me to send you the previous PDF again? Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210050354365053003] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Microsoft is committed to protecting your privacy. Please read the Microsoft Privacy Statement for more information.The above is an email for a support case from Microsoft Corp.REPLY ALL

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110052070326491] MS_RRP: Question on Symbolic Links

Hi Andreas: Thanks for contacting Microsoft regarding your question about MS-RRP. A member of the protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andreas Schneider [mailto:m...@cynapses.org

Re: [cifs-protocol] Ordering of domain in case of DFS domain referral

Hi Matthieu: Thanks you for contacting Microsoft regarding your question on MS-DFSC. A member of protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa

Re: [cifs-protocol] Replicating deleted object procedure clarifications

Hi Kamen: Thank you for contacting Microsoft regarding your question on deleted objects. A member of protocol documentation team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft From: kame...@gmail.com [mailto:kame...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kamen

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210050354365053001 ] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

Hi Matthieu: Please let me know if the following answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 3:31 PM To: 'Matthieu Patou' Cc

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:210050354365053002] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

should happen is the client is not in a site (for instance if it has a static ip and the admin forgot to declare this subnet in one site)? A. Please see section 3.3.1.1, above. Please let me know if this answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210050354365053001 ] more ms-dfsc.pdf questions

Hi Matthieu: Thank you for the traces. I'll get back to you as soon as I have something concrete. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:01 PM

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters

call (RPC) because NULL was stored to the output parameter pointed to by pHandle. Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Thanks Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andreas Schneider

[cifs-protocol] [REG: 210041353965669001 ]RE: MS-RPRN: Question on PRINTER_INFO_STRESS.cAddNetPrinters

Hi Andreas: Just an update. I am still working on your issue. As soon as I have something concrete, I'll be in touch. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andreas Schneider [mailto:m...@cynapses.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110021555999716] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions

Hi Matthieu: I assume that the explanation provided by me answers your question. If you feel otherwise, please respond by Friday April 16, 2010. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi oba...@microsoft.com Sent: Monday

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions

Hi Matthieu: Please let me know if it answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:21 AM To: Matthieu Patou Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] Spoolss questions

human-readable. Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent: Saturday, February 27

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 210031349737651001 ] MS-KILE and ad-type 142 ?

2008 R2, the number of milliseconds that have elapsed since the system was started is sent on the wire. This time is not used by KILE. Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft

[cifs-protocol] [REG:210031349737651001] [MS-KILE] and ad-type 142

Hi Simo: My name is Obaid Farooqi and I'll be helping you with this issue regarding MS-KILE. I'll update you with my findings as appropriate. If you have a question/clarification regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer

[cifs-protocol] [REG: 110021555999716 ] RE: Spoolss questions

Hi Mathew: Please provide the detailed steps to get the capture http://www.matws.net/mat/misc/xpserver_genericprinter. Please include the OS information with service packs applied as well. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

Hi Kamen: I'll look into it and will get back to you with my findings. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Kamen Mazdrashki [mailto:kamen.mazdras...@postpath.com] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:09 AM To: Obaid Farooqi; abart

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

your question. If yes, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft     -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:39 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: cifs-proto

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

Hi Andrew: Thanks for the clarification. I'll get back to you as soon as I have something concrete. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:39 AM To: Obaid

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

Hi Andrew: In an effort to fully understand your goals, please explain what you are looking to achieve through the addition of documentation that defines the internal structure of the prefixMap attribute. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

when explicitly requested. Please let me know if this answers your question. If yes, I'll consider this issue resolved. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

Hi Andrew: Just an update. We are still working on this issue and I'll be in touch as soon as I have an answer for you. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Senior Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, November

Re: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP

Hi Andrew: We're still working on this issue and I'll be in touch as soon as I have something concrete. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:38 PM To: 'Andrew Bartlett' Cc: cifs

Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about [MS-DRSR] section 5.12.2 - prefixMap implementation

Hi Kamen: Thank you for contacting Microsoft regarding your question about MS-DRSR. A member of Protocol Documentation Team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Kamen Mazdrashki [mailto:kamen.mazdras

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios

Hi Zachary: Thanks for contacting Microsoft regarding your question on CIFS. A member of Protocol Documentation Team will be in touch soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Zachary Loafman [mailto:zachary.loaf...@isilon.com

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Hi Matthieu: I am still working on this issue. Thanks for your patience. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:30 PM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: p

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Hi Matthieu: Thanks for the clarification. I am working with product team to have an answer for your question. As soon as I have an answer, I'll be in touch. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

, it is described in MS-NRPC section 2.2.1.3.11 and MS-LSAD 2.2.7.18. If you have any further question on the meaning of SupportedEncTypes, please let me know. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

to SupportedEncTypes as soon as I have them. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:58 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Hi Matthieu: I did not run the test for win 7 and WS2008R2 but code in unchanged (at the writing of this email) so I would expect the behavior to be same as vista and ws2008. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou

Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS

Hi Nadezhda: I have just sent you the answer for the security descriptor algorithm question. The work on owner and group rules in MS-ADTS is in progress and I'll be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Thanks for your patience. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:23 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Hi Matthieu: Please send me the network traces for both Windows 2003 and Windows 2008. Please also mention the number of frames that have the problem. Please also include the information about the environment, especially client OS (DC OS is obvious from question). Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr

Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 1:02 PM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: Re: Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server

Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms

Hi Nadezhda: I just want to update that work on the final version of algorithm is still in progress. I’ll update you as soon as I have the new version. Thanks you for your patience. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Friday, July 10

Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL

, so it is an AND. Does this clarify it for you? Please let me know either way. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Nadezhda Ivanova [mailto:nadezhda.ivan...@postpath.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:32 AM To: Obaid Farooqi Cc

Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms

Hi Nadezhda: Just an update. I am still working on your issue. I’ll update you as soon as I have something concrete. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:47 AM To: 'Nadezhda Ivanova' Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs

[cifs-protocol] RE: Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms

Hi Nadezhda: My name is Obaid Farooqi and I am a member of protocol documentation team. I’ll be helping you with your question regarding security descriptor creation algorithms. I’ll keep you updated as appropriate with my investigation. Feel free to contact me if you have any further question

[cifs-protocol] RE: What are the 'Service' levels in SamLogonEx?

Hi Andrew: Please let us know whether the following explanation answers your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. SEE | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 1:56 PM To: 'Andrew Bartlett' Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject

[cifs-protocol] RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

Good Morning Ronnie: I haven't received the information I requested in the following email. Please provide the information. We need this to move forward in this case. Thanks Obaid Farooqi Sr. SEE | Microsoft -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:45

  1   2   >