On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:00:12 +0200 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we cannot have any advice of such a software only with
> screenshots.
> The most important is the engine: what can we do with it. Even in
> termes of productivity.
I haven't used it, but based o
anyone compared this with cinelerra?
http://lives.sourceforge.net/index.php?do=features
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:37:17 +0200 Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AudioALSA::write_buffer underrun at sample
i got that message when i was using dosbox and the audio output didn't have
enough data to send to the audio driver, thus audio was jumpy.
i'm guessing you are experiencing the sa
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:17:46 +0800 Graham Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1 fixed bitrate
wasn't the maximum bitrate at 8000 (official dvd spec)? i could be wrong...
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailm
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:15:38 +1000 Vaughan Famularo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to render from the timeline to an Mpeg2 Video file.
> I am using the standard DVD settings in the Video rendering gui.
as amazing as it seems, cinelerra doesn't support DVD compatible MPEG-2 output.
you
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:36:53 +0800 Graham Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also I don't agree with the "simple interface" option. A lot of effort
> has gone into making the current interface as simple as possible while
> keeping from hiding the features or from making important decisions
> o
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:30:49 +0200 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But up to Radeon 9200/9250 we have free driver. are these ones suitable
> ?
i believe they don't fully support OpenGL 2, but i could be wrong.
___
Cinelerra ma
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:27:14 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't think the interface is the problem; I think stability is the
> problem. And if we're capable of offering a choice of "Would you like
> crashing or non-crashing?", why bother making that a choice?
i believe we are talking
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:47:54 +0200 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the OpenGL 2.0 support related to the ATI *hardware* or only a
> matter of software?
Its a matter of software only. ATI always had bad drivers and even worse
support for Linux.
__
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:07:14 +0200 Eric Seigne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is more "gnome look" but it's just a cinelerra skin.
Unfortunately a theme won't help. We need something that will radically change
the interface and make it easier to understand and use.
_
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:08:50 +0200 muzzol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think best way to do all this kind of improvements is openning a bug
> for each one and work on it step by step.
sure, i opened a new bug report:
http://bugs.cinelerra.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
_
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:46:47 +0200 Andraž Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to be too negative, but this suggestion is in the same effort range
> as the original one.
no problem, we are all here to discuss.
> If you want to make it easier to use to the level you want it, you need
> to rewr
I can see what Jordan Nash is trying to say and i'm not going to be offended by
his email. It is true, cinelerra is not user friendly and the learning curve is
indeed steep.
I also believe that starting over isn't doable. Lets face it, cinelerra is
beign developed by a small group of developers
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:14:05 +0200 Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a tripod could have been used to shot some scenes. There're some
> parts of the video which do not look professional because the camcorder
> was handheld.
I also agree, a tripod would have made some scenes better look
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:28:04 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is indeed about competition. Because of nVidia's not releasing open
> source drivers, I'm that much less likely to buy or recommend their
> products, because a product that has open source drivers is more valuable
> to me than
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:05:05 +0200 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get a Radeon 9260, you will have open source drivers... and fanlesss ...
sure, but what happens when i want to boot to OS/2? or FreeBSD?
aah ATI doesn't support those operating systems do they?
so what ha
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:01:15 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I care. "Anyone working for a similar organization very well understands
> why" is not an excuse I consider acceptable. That same statement could be
> used to justify almost anything. I'm not sure how relevant this kind of
> phi
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ati released the specs to their Rage3D chipset to the community. I think
> that is nice too. Since some people are working on an open nvidia
> accelerated driver I'm happy to see something is actually going on.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:50:53 -0500 Jeremiah Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who cares about the win32 drivers.
yeah well i'm a windoze basher as well and bash at them at every chance i get,
but when it comes down to doing business, if the system has ATI drivers even
under windoze, then all h
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If they are so good... why isn't there a PPC version :)
dunno, to tell you the truth, i'm amazed they offer drivers and support for so
many platforms, maybe PPC will be offered in the future.
currently they
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Leonardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know if "Requires OpenGL 2.0" applies to all
> effects or if we can expect OpenGl speedups for most of them
> also with cards not supporting the 2.0 version?
Not related to cinelerra directly, but my opinio
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:05:58 -0500 Tom Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to get a handle on which utility might work for determining file
> format info. I downloaded a sample clip, and followed tutorial
> instructions. The file was a .mov, and qtinfo worked. Is there a
> general utilit
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:27:07 -0500 Tom Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have svn installed. I would like the experts here to help me get
> cinelerra installed, correctly. I noticed there were some Fedora rpms
> available, and am now confused. Any advice or suggestions appreciated
> as to w
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:19:08 -0400 Computer Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one P4 with HT, so I was wondering if Cinelerra would gain any
> extra benefit from that. I was also wondering if I get a new box(es)
> should I just put my money into an AMD64 Dual Opteron box with dual core
I agree with Herman on this issue.
Cinelerra needs to do things cleanly, without using linux-specific hacks with
pipes and scripts.
I've been around this mailing list for a month or so and while i've got
cinelerra installed on my system, i'm still not using it.
I'll wait for another month or s
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:04:29 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ever considered to have a look at Debian?
i dont have any problems with Fedora, so if its not broken don't fix it :)
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:16:56 +0200 "Helge Nert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had huge problems getting cinelerra to work on my FC4 x86_64
> platform.
I'm still learning cinelerra, but i haven't had any problems related to the
distribution. I'm using Fedora Core 5 x86_64 with the latest RPM
On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:56:36 +0200 Andraz Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For this you firstly need a 3D tool that has some kind of support for
> rotoscopy...
> Rotoscopy is something you do in specialized program not in Cinelerra,
> the final editing can be done in cinelerra naturally...
under
can cinelerra do this? (effects, etc everything)
http://www.405themovie.com
Direct link to video:
http://www.coreybryant.net/misc/405/405-hi%5B1%5D.wmv
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/
What would be better, my Dual Dual Core Opteron (4 logical CPUs) or 4
single-cpu systems as a renderfarm?
In other words, does cinelerra support proper spliting of rendering in SMP mode
like it does for a renderfarm?
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cineler
On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:31:26 +0930 Pierre Marc Dumuid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious as to what people think about the performance of
> cinelerra. Which would be faster? A dual core or a AMD Semprom 3.0 Ghz
> (64 bit)
I would also like some answers. I haven't started using cinelerr
On Sat, 13 May 2006 09:56:12 -0500 Alex Ferrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Wiki Maual is at : manual.cinelerra.org (points to
> www.ftconsult.com)
>
> A good intro begins at :
> http://www.ftconsult.com/twiki/bin/view/Cinelerra/UsingCinelerra#Using_Cinelerra
thanks, i'll check them out.
On Fri, 12 May 2006 19:42:41 +0200 Ichthyostega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are no "wizzards, online help, cheat sheets" and the like. The user
> just needs to
> know precisely what he wants and what he is doing, that's the problem :-)
no oneline help? does that mean nobody will help me i
On Fri, 12 May 2006 21:15:17 +0200 Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did you pick this up? This is certainly not true.
3 different people told me that, 2 of them from the irc channel, 1 via email :)
Since its not true then there is no probem :)
___
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:43:42 +0200 Andraz Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cinelerra is tricky to use, you've got to know what you are doing. I
> suggest anyone that wants to learn it to FIRST at least skip through
> whole big manual, and then start to use it. Or go to a workshop or class
> about
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > i'd like to avoid re-encoding over and over again. would it be possible to
> > capture from my DV camera and to save in a format other than raw DV?
>
> Mmm... buggy, after doing serveral hours of raw dv fi
On Thu, 11 May 2006 15:52:03 -0400 Claude Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only problem with the freshrpm packages is that they're kind of
> old. Old in the sense that they are buld date of Aug 27, 2005.
> Andraz and co. have been very busy these past 9 months, and
> there are many new featur
On Fri, 12 May 2006 06:24:33 +0200 "Herman Robak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lastly: DON'T use raw DV with cinelerra! It is severely buggy.
> Use AVI or Quicktime.
i'd like to avoid re-encoding over and over again. would it be possible to
capture from my DV camera and to save in a format othe
On Thu, 11 May 2006 21:20:14 +0200 Johannes Sixt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cinelerra has all your editing requirements. For PiP you'll need a
> deinterlacer, which is also available.
i was told that cinelerra has problems with progressive video, is that true?
On Thu, 11 May 2006 19:50:48 +0200 Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never used fedora :) Hope you can get your packages in x86_64 optimized.
Yup, freshrpms provides packages for i386 and x86_64 architectures by default,
cinelerra packages are here:
http://bordeaux.freshrpms.net/rpm
On Thu, 11 May 2006 16:41:12 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> kino or dvgrab, so.you can use formats dv-avi, dv quicktime and dv
no problem there.
> you can export video and audio from cin then multiplex an mpeg2..or encode
> mpeg2/vob after exportingnot so easy to explain in a mai
On Thu, 11 May 2006 16:34:26 +0200 (CEST) Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Pinacle/Ulead/friends. But what is wrong with serperate programs doing
> this task?
no problem at all i dont mind separate programs, but how about the editing
features i asked about? does cinelerra support t
Hello everyone, this is my first time in this mailing list. I'd appriciate some
help.
I've got the following system:
Dual Dual Core Opteron 270 (4 logical CPUs)
4GB ram PC3200
SCSI RAID (8 drives, 10.000rpm, U160)
NVIDIA GeForce 7800GTX PCIExpress
Unfortunately it runs Windoze Server 2003 64bit.
43 matches
Mail list logo
