"Bradley A. Hare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Gumster wrote:
>
> > I regularly use Cinelerra on one of three machines: an
> > eight-year-old box with an Athlon XP 2500+, a laptop with a
> > hyperthreaded 3GHz P4, and another laptop with a dual core
> > Turion64.
> Interesting thanks
Jason van Gumster wrote:
I regularly use Cinelerra on one of three machines: an eight-year-old
box with an Athlon XP 2500+, a laptop with a hyperthreaded 3GHz P4, and
another laptop with a dual core Turion64.
Interesting thanks - I would have bet on heavier hardware. Can't
imagine that
A
"Bradley A. Hare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Gumster wrote:
> > I can't be the only one who's done successful complex editing in
> > Cinelerra. I do fair amount of of work, professionally and
> > independently, and while I'll admit Cinelerra isn't perfect, it
> > certainly does the j
Bradley A. Hare wrote:
Jason van Gumster wrote:
I can't be the only one who's done successful complex editing in
Cinelerra. I do fair amount of of work, professionally and
independently, and while I'll admit Cinelerra isn't perfect, it
certainly does the job for me on the projects I choose to u
Jason van Gumster wrote:
I can't be the only one who's done successful complex editing in
Cinelerra. I do fair amount of of work, professionally and
independently, and while I'll admit Cinelerra isn't perfect, it
certainly does the job for me on the projects I choose to use it on.
Could you de
Since other "silent" users are busting out of the woodwork to voice
their opinions, I'm compelled to spit my two cents on all of the recent
discussion. ;)
Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bradley A. Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Working minimal functionality that can be maintained.
Mark Carter wrote:
I've taken to hacking away a bit at the code - and alas I broke my
version. One thing that leaps out is all those case statements, esp.
wrt colour models. I may be being too niaive, but I'd really like to
see some kind of method of getting a grip on that. I looked at the
f
From: Bradley A. Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Working minimal functionality that can be maintained. I might be
> wrong, others
> seem to have been more successful at this than I have,
I just want to use Cinelerra for more casual amateur use, rather than
professional.
I've found Cinelerra rather
Valentina Messeri wrote:
YOU..you're simply talking about your experience, do'you really
think, talking about "educational purposes" that propietary tools
worth the while?
I could understand "profesional purpose", cause people got so used to
their propietary tools and they, obviously, think
Mark Carter wrote:
HV is undoubtedly a better programmer than me. I think he wrote it in
a way that made sense for him. He wrote most of the code, so he pretty
much knows the score of what's going on in it. But what works for him
may not work for everybody else.
Certainly there is a lot of cr
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:10:42 +0200, Christian Thaeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Herman Robak wrote:
(about interlacing)
Here is how I think it should go:
1) Split out the fields, putting them after one another on the timeline.
2 a) Line-double or interpolate them up to full vertical re
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:24:01 +0200, Valentina Messeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In it's present state I'm afraid that it would be
an exercise in frustration that would totally defeat the purpose.
For now Final Cut Pro or Final Cut Express seats make a lot more
sense. They work flawlessly, ev
> I would worry about the architecture of the thing first. Right
> now the code extremely tangled with many opportunities for
> non-deterministic behavior. I assume that's why everyone is arguing
> about a re-write. My own opinion is that a re-design is
> needed first.
HV is undoubtedly a
hi,
:D
i really don't want start a flame, hehehhe, only "make some
observations" about the way you start you large mail.
I've been lurking here for a while, but this thread has been too much
to resist.
I would very much like to find an open source solution for video editing that
could b
I've been lurking here for a while, but this thread has been too much to
resist.
I would very much like to find an open source solution for video editing
that
could be used locally for educational purposes, but right now I can't
recommend Cinelerra as I have never been able to get it working wel
I'm know, I'm brining this thread monstrously off topic, but there are a
few more things I need to respond to... :)
> To me, the "distance" theory sounds too much like rationalisation.
Think about it this way: The smooth motion of 50hz and 60hz is far closer
to what our eyes see in reality, so w
Herman Robak wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:58:55 +0200, Derek McTavish Mounce
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Forgot this. More of a question on what you mean exactly:
>>
>>> An NLE that deals
>>> with TV material (not just cinematic stuff) ought to be able to
>>> preserve interlacing through
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:41:57 +0200, Derek McTavish Mounce
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you are writing from a user's perspective. From the user's
perspective, Cinelerra is "almost there". I agree. In terms of
features, Cinelerra is near-complete. Or so it seems, at least.
True
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:58:55 +0200, Derek McTavish Mounce
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgot this. More of a question on what you mean exactly:
An NLE that deals
with TV material (not just cinematic stuff) ought to be able to
preserve interlacing throughout the workflow, no matter how many
e
Forgot this. More of a question on what you mean exactly:
>An NLE that deals
>with TV material (not just cinematic stuff) ought to be able to
>preserve interlacing throughout the workflow, no matter how many
>effects or transformations you throw in.
It is absolutely not possible to apply a trans
> I think you are writing from a user's perspective. From the user's
> perspective, Cinelerra is "almost there". I agree. In terms of features,
> Cinelerra is near-complete. Or so it seems, at least.
True enough, user I am. Though I have enough experience in programming to
be at least sligh
can't agree more, thanks for pointing this out, Herman!
Herman Robak schrieb:
>
> If you are going to question a _developer's_ rationale for rewriting the
> progam from scratch, you have to get a feel on how developing Cinelerra is.
...
> Interlacing is not going away soon.
...
> And 50Hz inte
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:14:32 +0200, Derek McTavish Mounce
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting thoughts, Richard. While I do think that Cinelerra could use
a deal of refactoring and general cleaning up, I very much agree that a
completely new base is not necessary. A lot of work has been p
Interesting thoughts, Richard. While I do think that Cinelerra could use
a deal of refactoring and general cleaning up, I very much agree that a
completely new base is not necessary. A lot of work has been put into
what's already here, and it would be a shame to lose it.
Your three suggestions -
Interesting thoughts, Richard. While I do think that Cinelerra could use
a deal of refactoring and general cleaning up, I very much agree that a
completely new base is not necessary. A lot of work has been put into
what's already here, and it would be a shame to lose it.
Your three suggestions -
Hi,
I just read through these plans for an API to the cinelerra
functionality, and I'd like to share my views a little.
First of all, I do believe that everyone should hack whatever he wants
to, as long as he does it for fun. ;-)
Ok, now what I don't like. In my opinion there are already plenty
26 matches
Mail list logo
