So... if you hit enter after all these messages have completed, what
happens?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 08/02/2001
08:56 am ---
Cisco Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 08/02/2001
01:27:56 am
Please respond to Cisco
Hi,
Chatting with one of the frame guys beside me he tells me there is an extended DLCI
range available in the header. This is made up of an extra 2 octets. These are the
'upper DLCI field' the normal DCLI lives in the 'lower dlci field'
There is a white paper at
they were boring because the questions asked had
little or "nitwit" relevance to what the companies
wanted to do.
in my opinion a ccda exam shd have had better and
interesting scenarios.
regards
mongol
That's a valid observation.
Let me offer a bit of perspective on nitwit-ism in the real
You need CCDA also.
Priscilla
At 05:57 PM 2/7/01, Timothy Ouellette wrote:
I just looked on the cisco site and I wanted to make sure. If I have
the CCNP, all I have to take is the CID course in order to obtain my
CCDP?
Will the CCDP helping more than NP in locating a position. I'm currently
Actually it's not a good idea to do a 'conduit permit icmp any any'. If you
want ping traffic to originate inside then do this:
conduit permit icmp 208.184.23.0 255.255.255.0 any echoreply
Think about the way ping works - your workstation sends an icmp echo - the
end station sends an icmp
Anyone have heard of this term? I heard that anything smaller than
204.255.255.255 are portable and anything larger than 206.0.0.0 is
non-portable. I was told that this is an industry standard between the
several large ISP. (i.e. not the real "RFC" standard). Is that true?
thanks
Kenny,
I am not so sure. You must be talking about RFC 1149 instead. I don't
believe token ring is mention in RFC 2549. Token Ring is not stated in RFC
1149 but it does talk about Point to Point connection. That would be the
case if you are not using a MAU in a Token Ring network.
:)
Albert
Hi
"Portable" or address blocks that are "owned" by a company are assigned by
ARIN (and others). Basicly there are addresses that you can use independent
of your ISP.
I suggest you make a visit to the ARIN web site. www.arin.net And learn more
about this subject. There are all kinds of miths
Pardon my ignorance here
Is there such a thing as just a "T1 Link"...
of what I understand T1 / Frac T1 resides in the physical layer Dont u
need something at the Data Link Layer (such as Frame Relay) before you can
enable IP or IPX at layer 3
_
FAQ,
NAT like u said is a one to one translation between the external IP and the
internal one (at its purest form)
When u use NAT overloading u r also using PAT, hence u really cannot compare
the twoThey work in cunjunction
I personally like to think of PAT as what most people refer to as NAT
I
Haven't you heard of the new high speed 'token ring ethernet adaptor' as
defined in RFC 2549 ;)
Kenny
"Albert Ip" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Token Ring and Ethernet does not operate on the same principles as
Ethernet.
Ethernet uses
More comments inline
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 08/02/2001
11:54 am ---
John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 08/02/2001 04:24:17
am
Please respond to John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As you all have mentioned PAT is a many to one
scenerio vs. NAT a one-to-one. Be careful with these
terms, some people don't use the word PAT and NAT
means different things to different people (masking,
spoofing) PAT is generally a Cisco used phrase.
But why use NAT vs. PAT?
Well though it
Does anyone know of an IP database package or template that can store at =
least 7000 IPaddresses. I know of all the big players such as QIP 5.0 =
Meta IP, etc, but I just need the database and report generating of the =
software. All of our addresses are static so DHCP is not need nor is =
DNS.
I have the following study material to trade:
=20
=20
Cheat-Sheets.com entire CCNP 2.0 and CCNA 2.0 practice test
=20
Cisco CCNA Prep Lib
=20
Official Cisco Student Course for BCMSN, BCRAN, CCNA and CCDA
=20
Classroom Training slide for the entire CCNP 2.0 adn CCDP 2.0
Voice over IP CIM
=20
Hi,
My limited understanding of the technology tells me that we have something like a
telnet session in IP. The telnet application is associated with a socket (port) 23
this goes down the protocol stack and attaches and IP address. Assuming ethernet the
packet as it is now goes on down the
without the use of an MAU, is it possible to make a token ring RJ45 to RJ45
crossover cable or it
the same as ethernet ?
Regards,
Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
The DLCI value is not stored contiguously within the Address field of the
Frame Relay frame, but rather is subdivided into two separate components—one
containing the DLCI high-order bits, and the other containing DLCI low-order
bits.
A frame relay address field can be two, three, or four bytes
Hi,
I had to take a look at rfc 894 (ethernet) and rfc 1042 (ieee802)
from rfc 1042:
"
It is possible to use the Ethernet link level protocol [12] on the
same physical cable with the IEEE 802.3 link level protocol. A
computer interfaced to a physical cable used in this way could
potentially
Hi Jason,
I don't think so given what was written in the previous posts.
However after the talk over the mysterious RFC 2549 or 1149 I don't quite
know what to think.
Maybe its time to do some more reading on token ring and figure it by
ourselves. :)
Regards,
Pierre-Alex
-Original
Seeing that nobody had really addressed your question yet, I decided to
take a stab at it.
T1 is a high-speed digital carrier facility developed by ATT in the 1950s
to support long-haul pulse-code modulation (PCM) voice transmission. T1
provides digital voice circuits or "channels." There are
Try:
clear line aux|con|vty #
something like:
clear line aux 0
then it will ask if you want to confirm doing that, hit return or type Y
that should do it.
Ed
""James Haynes"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
95cdj1$ou6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:95cdj1$ou6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sorry,
I
I've tried to diagram this question to make it clear...
Host A is sending to Host D...
A line error occurs on the serial link between Router-B and Router-C while
passing a packet from Host-A to Host-B
Devices - Host A-ROUTER B-ROUTER CHOST D
Interfaces - (A1)
Thanks priscilla, that helped tremendously...
If that is the case... then what is the most common L2 Encapsulation used
when usually setting up a T1 link...(point to point)
Is it safe to assume HDLC as that is the default encap on the cisco routers
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was under the impression - If the remote end gets an error it asks the sending
device to retransmit. This retransmitted packet came from the originator not the
router. The store and forward as I understood it got a packet if all looked ok it sent
it on if not it dropped it and sent
My understanding of Ethernet having previously read RFC 1042 has been (as
Anthony pointed out), that a router that receives 802.3 frames on an
Ethernet interface will send out frames out using 802.3 encapsulation. A
router that receives Ethernet_II frames on an Ethernet interface will send
out
Hi,
I have a date of March in SanJose, anyone like to swap with me in june.
Regards,
Dar
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 09:22:16PM -0700, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:
[snip]
Which leads to the question - why a default frame type, if the default frame
type isn't used as an encapsulation frame type for creating Ethernet frames
received by an end-system?
The answer is mu. The default frame
Seeing that nobody had really addressed your question yet, I decided to
take a stab at it.
T1 is a high-speed digital carrier facility developed by ATT in the 1950s
to support long-haul pulse-code modulation (PCM) voice transmission. T1
provides digital voice circuits or "channels." There are 24
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
