RE: WAN Switching [7:34035]

2002-02-02 Thread Angel Leiva
Hi, I am CCNP-WAN certified and have 3+ years of Cisco (formely StrataCom) WAN switches experience. Is there anything you're looking for in particular? Thanks, Angel Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: WAN Switching [7:34035]

2002-02-02 Thread Angel Leiva
Hi, I am CCNP-WAN certified and have 3+ years of Cisco (formely StrataCom) WAN switches experience. Is there anything you're looking for in particular? Thanks, Angel MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Surya Prakash

Re: Pix - Comparison - Conduit - Access-list [7:34155]

2002-02-02 Thread Gaz
Larry, You've not missed a thing. I felt like I was going a round about way of doing something when there may be an easier way. Agreed on the need to restrict access from DMZ to outside. I think I was aiming more to get back to the point that I was at with conduits, rather than trying to achieve

CCIE LAB requirements [7:34186]

2002-02-02 Thread Ronnie
Hi all, Probably this question has been asked before but Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written) and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco website. I'm very curious (since it seems that the WAN + IP part is already configured and

which books and documents i should learn ? [7:34187]

2002-02-02 Thread Li jack
i want to take ccie written examination ! who can make a plan of study for me ! and please list the books and documents i should read ! thanks very much ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34187t=34187 -- FAQ, list

Re: multicast / CGMP towards the multicast server [7:33964]

2002-02-02 Thread Nigel Taylor
Priscilla, You're correct in that Fears' real fear at this point has not been answered. ;- In doing some quick research, I found that as you mentioned IGMP(costly) and CGMP(a less costly solution) would assist in providing one the ability to control multicast flooding. This is what

Passed Cisco Switching [7:34189]

2002-02-02 Thread amanda lalli-cafini
Thank you to all who post and answer my questions. I am 3/4 of the way there. :) I hope to get a book on Troubleshooting this week. I used the Cisco Press Study Guide and a bit of Cisco Interactive Mentor (CIM). I didn't really like CIM though. I found the labs to be very confining. You

RE: Passed CSIDS [7:34131]

2002-02-02 Thread amanda lalli-cafini
Chris, Thanks for that... I am working on CCNP right now, but the security is next on the list. I noticed you are from Cleveland I am originally from ohio myself. I bet it is cold right now. Anyway thanks for the information and congradulations :) !! Message Posted at:

Multicast in catalyst 6500 environment [7:34192]

2002-02-02 Thread Eve Mitch
Hi all, Have 2 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 and MSFC2 modules in each switch in the core. And 4 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 in the access layer. Have about 10 VLAN using using ISL. There is a multicast server connecte to vlan 10 on CoreSwitch1. Is using pim dense mode on the MSFC2 and igmp snooping

RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34150]

2002-02-02 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
That makes sense! Thank you. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34150] The Host Requirements RFC (RFC

RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152]

2002-02-02 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152] At 07:23 PM 2/1/02, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: How

Re: Configuring a Router as a FR Switcht for lab prupose [7:34195]

2002-02-02 Thread Steven A. Ridder
did you put the global frame-relay switching command on? wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I had problems while confguring my lab environment. I configure a 2600 router with 8 serial as FR switch. Please can any one post me a working config because my

Re: Multicast in catalyst 6500 environment [7:34192]

2002-02-02 Thread Nigel Taylor
Mitch, See Inline... - Original Message - From: Eve Mitch To: Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 7:18 AM Subject: Multicast in catalyst 6500 environment [7:34192] Hi all, Have 2 Catalyst 6509 with sup2 and MSFC2 modules in each switch in the core. And 4 Catalyst 6509 with

test [7:34197]

2002-02-02 Thread Allen May
test Just trying to figure out why it's taking anywhere from 6 - 20 hours for my posts to reach the site. Am I the only one? Allen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34197t=34197 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: OT: WAN PRI to T1 [7:33159]

2002-02-02 Thread Scott
Need a little more information. So I am clear you have: CPE - T1 Telco - PRI-- CPE Is it a full T1 point to point, all 24 channels? If it is full T1, I don't understand the reasoning behind wanting it this way, and I don't see it working. On the same physical T1, can you

Re: CCIE LAB requirements [7:34186]

2002-02-02 Thread c1sc0k1d
Ronnie wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, Probably this question has been asked before but Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I passed the written) and what to prepare for ? I can't find any usefull on the cisco website. I'm

Limit Internet BW [7:34200]

2002-02-02 Thread Fernando Shiran
Hello, I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting. I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.

Limit Internet BW [7:34201]

2002-02-02 Thread Fernando Shiran
Hello, I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do have a T1 and want to allow site A to be access bandwidth not more than 256K while site B can access full bandwidth without restricting. I do have a Cisco 2620 as the Gatway router. All ideas greatly appreciated.

Network Visio Diagram [7:34202]

2002-02-02 Thread Elijah Savage
All, This is a little off topic, but I need help quick. I have been using Netviz for a long time and really become to like it and proficient in it. But now my job is requiring us to convert all of our Netviz docs to Visio. I do not know to much about Visio at all so I was looking around amazon

Re: CCIE LAB requirements [7:34186]

2002-02-02 Thread c1sc0k1d
Hr... try again... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#4 Ronnie wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, Probably this question has been asked before but Does anybody know how the 1-day lab looks like (Yep I

RE: Limit Internet BW [7:34201]

2002-02-02 Thread Roberts, Larry
What type of connection is between site A and B ? Without knowing you layout, it might be possible to use queuing to limit what address's get a percentage of the bandwidth. If you can't do it internal, and assuming you can assign each site a different external IP address, you could just filter

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-02 Thread MADMAN
Another important factor is where the sites are located. congestion is most prevelant in the NNI's. McCallum, Robert wrote: I have seen circuits built and have been working absolutely perfectly with 5:1 contention. For this scenario I would easily suggest a 2 or 3:1 contention. Lets face

Re: Strange Problem: Everything works fine but the Router can [7:34208]

2002-02-02 Thread MADMAN
Have you tried disabling ip route-cache?? In the past couple weeks I have run into two route-cache bugs. Dave Brian wrote: so what does sh ip ro 193.0.0.193 give? If only the one static, then try debugging icmp on a ping test.. Bri On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Hamid wrote: As I

RE: Limit Internet BW [7:34201]

2002-02-02 Thread Fernando Shiran
Hello Larry, My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building) And using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get terminated to the same switch. But using different subnets for two sites with Vlans on the Switch. I want Site B to keep from bursting the

RE: Limit Internet BW [7:34200]

2002-02-02 Thread McCallum, Robert
look up the command rate-limit -Original Message- From: Fernando Shiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 February 2002 15:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Limit Internet BW [7:34200] Hello, I do have a requirment to limit Internet Bandwidth among few sites. I do have a T1 and want

NAT and dynamically attained ip [7:34213]

2002-02-02 Thread Tim Booth
Is there any way to get NAT (not PAT) to use as an outside interface, an Async interface that has IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATE and PPP IPCP ACCEPT-ADDRESS on it, or is it only possible to have NAT use an outside interface with a static IP address? Thanks, Tim Booth Message Posted at:

Re: NAT and dynamically attained ip [7:34213]

2002-02-02 Thread John Neiberger
Check out Easy IP: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/easyip.html http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/ 12cgcr/dial_c/dcezip.htm HTH, John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more

Re: Limit Internet BW [7:34201]

2002-02-02 Thread Steven A. Ridder
cb car Fernando Shiran wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello Larry, My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside a building) And using ethernet Switch for the connections as the Internet link get terminated to the same switch. But using

Re: Limit Internet BW [7:34201]

2002-02-02 Thread Frank Sullivan
Fernando, To limit traffic there is basically two places : Ingress and Egress (but usually on ingress) : Rate limit using Commited Access Rate - CAR Egress only : Shaping with GTS Frank s. Fernando Shiran wrote: Hello Larry, My problem is that the sites are at close Proximity. (inside

cef debug error slow service, what's it mean? [7:34218]

2002-02-02 Thread bergenpeak
I'm having some problems wit CEF and so enabled a number of CEF debug commands (ip cef drops, events, received). I'm getting periodic debug output which says CEF: slow service. What does this mean? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34218t=34218

Re: Network Visio Diagram [7:34202]

2002-02-02 Thread AMR
Being skilled in Visio is like being skilled in MS-Word. You can either use it or you can't. The fundamentals will come to you immediately. Elijah Savage wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, This is a little off topic, but I need help quick. I have been using

Re: multicast / CGMP towards the multicast server [7:33964]

2002-02-02 Thread D. J. Jones
Added note for anyone who may be interested:: The well-known CGMP multicast MAC address is: 0x0100,0cdd,, dj Nigel Taylor wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Priscilla, You're correct in that Fears' real fear at this point has not been answered.

Re: Multicast over Frame relay [7:34098]

2002-02-02 Thread D. J. Jones
Mahesh, When you run 'sh ip mroute' on your hub, do you see the serial interfaces for both of your spokes in the outgoing interface list for that specific group address? dj Mahesh Manjanatha wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am sorry to post same question second

Re: IOS License [7:34165]

2002-02-02 Thread Gaz
I just went to start the download of an image to see what the License agreement says. The text below is a quote from the license agreement. So it's cleared up one of your questions. I would guess that you would have to have a valid license for all routers with IOS installed. I should think there

Re: multicast / CGMP towards the multicast server [7:33964]

2002-02-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 06:18 AM 2/2/02, Nigel Taylor wrote: Even in an design where the host and the server reside on the same VLAN(segment) IGMP and CGMP still provide the ability to control flooding of multicast traffic. Specifically, when the host multicasts the IGMP membership report to the group with the

RE: CCIE Lab Question [7:34222]

2002-02-02 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Re your questions: 1 - I think you are correct. In the past candidates were required to configure the F/R switch but I believe this is done for you now. Whether or not you have any access to it is another question...I would have to assume no but I won't know for sure for another 7 days :) 2 -

What is the passing score for the 640-504 exam [7:34226]

2002-02-02 Thread Charles McKnight
Does anyone no what the passing score is for the CCNP 640-504 switching exam? Thanks... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34226t=34226 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

passing score for the CCNP switching exam? [7:34227]

2002-02-02 Thread Charles Mcknight
Can anyone tell me what is the passing score for the 640-504 exam? I'm looking to take the exam very soon. Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at:

Re: multicast / CGMP towards the multicast server [7:33964]

2002-02-02 Thread Charles Manafa
Like I said before, as long as you have a router connected to that segment (VLAN), multicast flooding will be constrained to the ports that have sent membership report. Non-registered clients will not be able to receive the multicast traffic, even though they are on the same VLAN as the sender.

BCMSN Fill in the Blank? [7:34230]

2002-02-02 Thread Jesse Loggins
I am taking the BCMSN on Monday (finally). Are there any fill in the blanks on this test, or is it like the BSCN with the command list? Or are there both types of questions on the test? Also what is passing for this exam? Message Posted at:

IPX over IPSec Tunnel - mystery solved?!?!? [7:34231]

2002-02-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
It's been a while, so let me restate the problem. R1--internet---R2--ethernet---R3---frame_relayre st of network |-IPsec_tunnel---| IPX encapsulated IPX RIP | |-IPX EIGRP---| hope

Re: What is the passing score for the 640-504 exam [7:34226]

2002-02-02 Thread David L. Blair
690-710 -dlb Charles McKnight wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone no what the passing score is for the CCNP 640-504 switching exam? Thanks... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34233t=34226

Re: passing score for the CCNP switching exam? [7:34227]

2002-02-02 Thread David L. Blair
690 - 710 -dlb Charles Mcknight wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone tell me what is the passing score for the 640-504 exam? I'm looking to take the exam very soon. Thanks _ Get

Re: BCMSN Fill in the Blank? [7:34230]

2002-02-02 Thread David L. Blair
I had a couple of fill in the blank. Mainly, pick from a list. It is the easiest of the CCNP tests. -dlb Jesse Loggins wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am taking the BCMSN on Monday (finally). Are there any fill in the blanks on this test, or is it like the

Request Training material [7:34238]

2002-02-02 Thread Ocsic
Anybody has the following training material (softcopy) ? Cisco SS7 Interconnect for Access Server Cisco SS7 Advanced Troubleshooting Cisco SS7 Interconnect Solutions Cisco SS7 Interconnect for Voice Gateways Solution Cisco SS7 Packet Tandem Solution Can mail it to me ? Thanks! Message

RE: IPX over IPSec Tunnel - mystery solved?!?!? [7:34231]

2002-02-02 Thread Thomas Salmen
Sorry - I missed your original post. There is a (resolved) bug (CSCdv16876) in IOS 12.2(3) where traffic does not pass across IPSec (or GRE) tunnels if fast switching is enabled on the tunnel interfaces - and it is by default. What often confuses is that ICMP pings are usually successful. --

Re: IPX over IPSec Tunnel - mystery solved?!?!? [7:34231]

2002-02-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
thanks. I looked at the bug report, which does not mention IPX, nor IOS 12.1.x, which my customer is running ( on different platforms ) first found in 12.2.3, but probably exists in a lot of other earlier versions. Also, the report speaks of GRE/IPSec tunnels in a hub and spoke setup. My

RE: Updated: Cable modems two 2501s [7:13649]

2002-02-02 Thread Wesley J
Hey Frank, I'm trying to hook up a Cisco 1750 ethernet port a Linksys router to my Roadrunner cable modem. The 2nd ethernet port on the 1750 will have lab routers connected to it, the Linksys router (4-port switch) will have a few computers connected to it. I want all to have access to the

RE: Updated: Cable modems two 2501s [7:13649]

2002-02-02 Thread Brian
Linksys deals do nat by default, so youd have a private ip block on the lan. Perhaps do a port forward deal to access the ether of the 1750, then just plain ole telnet to the Ciscos, I suspect this would work. Brian On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Wesley J wrote: Hey Frank, I'm trying to hook

Re: IOS License [7:34165]

2002-02-02 Thread Francois Leclair
See in-line : Irwan Hadi wrote: Dear All, I need to know, for Cisco IOS : 1. If we buy a used Cisco Routers with IOS installed, do we need to buy separate IOS license again ? Yes. The license's right are not transferable. You must buy the IOS software to be legal. Also,

Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
before I shut down for the evening, a few random thoughts on the CCIE Lab and NDA. Inspired by several posts here of late from persons asking about topology, IOS versions, or speaking of rumors about equipment changes. 1) It is unclear what really constitutes NDA. Caslow? The ECP1 class? NLI's

RE: What is the passing score for the 640-504 exam [7:34226]

2002-02-02 Thread jack li
699! i passed it just yesterday ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34246t=34226 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations

RE: WAN Switching [7:34035]

2002-02-02 Thread Sivarajan Thiruvadi
Hi I am also CCNP Wan. I am also very much concern about this. Regards Siva -Original Message- From: Paul Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 5:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WAN Switching [7:34035] Hey Mike, What do you think about the future

Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-02 Thread Nigel Taylor
Chuck, Thanks... for another great post. Maybe we could get Paul to make this standard reading for all who join the list, this way we avoid what we all fear...I dare not say the letters..for they spell fear themselves.. Of course the letter I refer to are NDA! This definitely is