Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread nrf
Kevin Cullimore wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm concerned that his focus is a little too narrow (and possibly distracted based upon the employer change) to be regarded as the authority on the cert over and above someone like, say, Bruce Caslow. I'm going by

Token Ring cable [7:45018]

2002-05-25 Thread Kenneth Yeung
Hi, Just start to prepare home lab, I got token ring interface (C2521) and MAU Hub. Where can I get the cable? What should I use? Any comment! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45018t=45018 -- FAQ, list archives,

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Kevin Cullimore
INS. Gobbled up by lucent during the somewhat less-than-rational corporate atmosphere that reigned supreme not so long ago. I did not mean to imply that he jumped ship from one to another, merely that he went from an organization most directly in competition with Cisco's professional services

Windows Radius Authentication for Cisco RAVPN [7:45020]

2002-05-25 Thread Santhanam, Thiyagarajan (Cognizant)
Hi All, Can I use Windows Radius server (IAS) for authenticating Cisco remote access VPN clients terminated in 7140...? Thanks Thiyagu This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If

Re: Token Ring cable [7:45018]

2002-05-25 Thread Frankie Chiang
You can make it by your self. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat2600/c26userg/cables. htm Best Regard, Frankie Kenneth Yeung wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Just start to prepare home lab, I got token ring interface (C2521) and MAU Hub.

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 3:34 AM -0400 5/25/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: INS. Gobbled up by lucent during the somewhat less-than-rational corporate atmosphere that reigned supreme not so long ago. I did not mean to imply that he jumped ship from one to another, merely that he went from an organization most directly in

Re: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45025]

2002-05-25 Thread Nigel Taylor
MAthais, I'm not sure if the ASCII art made the journey. but based on what I believe you're trying to accomplish see Inline... Note: Questions like this you should post to the main ist( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). You'll get a better response. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Peter van Oene
Actually, most of us think its quite cool to see Juniper guys writing Cisco Titles. Of note, Pete Moyer (also a member of Juniper Pro Services) was Jeff's technical editor in V1 (I'd think VII as well, though I've not got the book handy to check). To respond to the Cisco/Juniper mix, I can

RE: GROUPstudy.com......with the Emphasis on GROUP [7:44969]

2002-05-25 Thread Mike Sweeney
I have to agree.. in the last few months the board has taken a distinct turn for the worse and I find myself coming around here less and less. When I first started hanging around here over 1.5 years ago, it was much *looser* and friendlier. I have noticed that some who regularly contributed

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Thomas Larus
Thank you for asking for Mr. Doyle's input. His sentiments encourage me and inspire me to press on and learn as much as I can. The line If the engineer is smart and aggressive, it is easy enough to team him or her up with a mentor to add the practical experience, is precisely what I needed to

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Kevin Cullimore
I was also under the impression that you can't win,. since people will invariably oversimplify on the most immediately available data points and not be swayed from the simplest possible confusion. Upon reconsideration, maybe it's possible to simply NOT strongly identify Jeff Doyle with any given

Pix SSH to outside interface [7:45031]

2002-05-25 Thread Gaz
Hi all, I'm not sure whether this is possible or not , it could be a piece of cake, but I'm without a pix at the moment to try it on. If the outside interface is a private address (all registered addresses are just routed to the pix and translated to internal addresses), is it still possible to

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Scott H.
If the HR people (or hiring manager) are that uninformed, as a CCIE, it would not be a place I would want to work. People tend to flock to places that they are valued the most. A company who doesn't understand the value that a CCIE a brings to the table is not one that I would waste my precious

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 11:23 AM -0400 5/25/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: I was also under the impression that you can't win,. since people will invariably oversimplify on the most immediately available data points and not be swayed from the simplest possible confusion. Upon reconsideration, maybe it's possible to

RE: Token Ring cable [7:45018]

2002-05-25 Thread adam lee
That's a type 2 cable that connects to a router with a db9? Or is that RJ-45 on the 2521? Depends on how much time you want to spend on making/searching for a cable, I would suggest upgrading to a msau that uses rj-45. Cabletron hubs such as the STHI-24 are plentiful on ebay and probably will

Re: Private Addressing over Distances [7:44946]

2002-05-25 Thread Craig Columbus
IMO, it's never a good idea to use public addresses in a private network. The standard response I get when I tell people this is Well, it's never going to be put on the Internet or connected to another network, so it doesn't matter. But, you should look at it this way: For a given network,

Re: Bridge and switch [7:44649]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
first of all, thanks for the research. it makes sense now that I've read through it. it appears that things have changed a lot since the days of ISAM/VSAM and hashed lookups. I recall reading a bit about CEF, and coming to a similar conclusion - that the Computer Science people have done

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-25 Thread Michael L. Williams
nrf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The fact is, arrogance and insecurity cuts both ways. Both sides (the experienced guys and the inexperienced guys) are guilty from time to time. And it's bad no matter who's doing it. Agreed 100% Mike W. Message Posted

Re: Private Addressing over Distances [7:44946]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
couple of thoughts in line: Craig Columbus wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... IMO, it's never a good idea to use public addresses in a private network. The standard response I get when I tell people this is Well, it's never going to be put on the Internet or

Re: Bridge and switch [7:44649]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... snip a bit builds a routing table etc... I put the book down, pointed at it, and told my friend Don't by this book! I am appalled at what passes for techincal books (I guess I'm more sensitive about

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-25 Thread Gaz
It seems to me that this group spends more time bumping it's gums about what makes a good engineer, than it does discussing the actual engineering. Yes, I tend to join in myself sometimes. I suppose everybody does it, but I was just wondering - head count - is anybody actually studying as well as

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It seems to me that this group spends more time bumping it's gums about what makes a good engineer, than it does discussing the actual engineering. what was that Star Trek movie - where Jordi's visor is bugged by the Klingons,

Re: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
It figures, Howard, that you would have a plethora of sizes and types of hammers in your garage. I have only one, and believe me, just about every household repair problem indeed looks exactly like a nail. Even the one involving the pulling up of carpet to repair the rotted flooring underneath.

RE: ip helper address [7:45042]

2002-05-25 Thread Andy Hoang
Yes you can. Just type in the command multiple times in the interface config mode. If servers are on the same network, then you can use the network address instead of the host addr. For example: servers are 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2/24 then: r1(config-if)#ip helper-addres 1.1.1.1 r1(config-if)#ip

Re: Need help with wiring a lab [7:45015]

2002-05-25 Thread Dan Kline
Fran, I also use 2524's with back to back cables. Here is the Cisco link for building this cable to go between your T1 cards. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/75.html Dan Kline Francis Lind wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello all I have 4 2524s I

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread nrf
True, but in the short-run, it does the program and anybody who pursues it no favors. I think I can distill your arguement to basically, ...in the long run, the quality of the CCIE program will inevitably out'. My response is, like the economist John Maynard Keynes famously said: ...in the long

Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Elijah Savage
Seeing the other ip helper question made me think of what I was working on in my lab. On Friday morning I get into work and there was a severity 1 ticket where about 800 employees could not log in. We discovered that one of the dhcp servers was down but we have 2 so in theory all should have been

SV: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45044]

2002-05-25 Thread Jan Gunnik Hope
Hello Mathias ! In my opinion these are the possible (elegant :-) solutions, in preferred order : 1. Use area 0 range 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 not-advertise on routers R1/R2/R4, virtual link R2/R4. You need it on R4 as well, because as you said yourself, R4

Re: Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
I noticed this phenomenon in a production network where I once worked. We had two DHCP servers, but all machines in the network appeared to be hitting only the first one - all IP addresses issued company wide were from scopes defined on the first machine listed in the IP helper section. My

Re: DDR logging line opening ? [7:44798]

2002-05-25 Thread Chris Camplejohn
Check the SNMP MIBs...I can't remember the one off the top of my head, but there is one for Call Detail History...You can query that and get all sorts of good info (like you see in sh isdn hist, sh isdn active...) Chris Herold Heiko wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

debug output [7:45053]

2002-05-25 Thread Keith J.
Hi, how come my debug commands turn on debugging but I see no output (2501) how do I setup so debug output shows up in telnet session ? thanksHi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45053t=45053 --

RE: debug output [7:45053]

2002-05-25 Thread Frank Merrill
Keith J. wrote: Hi, how come my debug commands turn on debugging but I see no output (2501) how do I setup so debug output shows up in telnet session ? thanksHi If you've telneted in, use the 'terminal monitor' command. Good Luck! Message Posted at:

written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread CJ
Having obtained 69% and failing the CCIE qualification, There was one question which did not have a correct answer. Whom do I contact at Cisco address this issue. [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not yet replay since the last 4 days. Message Posted at:

How do you rate the CCIE Ramp;S book from hello c [7:45049]

2002-05-25 Thread mindiani mindiani
How do you rate the CCIE RS book from hello computers that certification zone is promoting compare to ccbootcamp ?. Please advise Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at:

Re: Standby Preempt [7:44762]

2002-05-25 Thread Frank Merrill
Chris Camplejohn wrote: This is a very common design in a campus backbone to track the vlan uplink from the distribution layer to the core layer. In that design, there is only one port at L2 that is in the uplink vlan (i.e. it is a point-to-point L3 vlan). So, when that one port goes

Re: Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Chris Camplejohn
Multiple ip helper-address on an interface has been supported for a long time. There is no sequential order per se. The UDP broadcast packet is converted to a unicast and sent to each address listed by a helper. I would recommend using a sniffer on the target network to ensure you are getting

Re: Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Elijah Savage
I have just spent my afternoon looking through my docs heheheheh. But I remember I actually saw this on a exam when I was going through my ccnp. It is in the routing book on page 87 very first paragraph. Exact quote, It is important to note that every broadcast gets sent to all helper addresses,

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread Scott H.
So far paying the bills hasn't been a problem. I tend to stick with the companies that have good reputations for the way they treat their employees. True, at some point in the future things will change but I'll deal with that when it happens. nrf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread Brad Ellis
Contact Sylvan Prometric or VUE to reschedule your test! Good luck. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net CJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Having obtained 69% and failing the CCIE qualification, There

Re: Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
I have a strong feeling that what is meant by this statement is that if your helper address is a subnet, rather than a host, that the destination address ( I believe the Siaddr field? correct me if I'm wrong - I can't get to any of the RFC sites I know for some reason ) would be the directed

Re: Ip Helper info in the lab [7:45045]

2002-05-25 Thread Chuck
interesting. I did find a couple of things in the various command references and in some TAC docs that indicated your answer is better than mine. OTOH, that still does not explain why 250 computers in eight different offices were all hitting the same DHCP server. The reason I know it to be true

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread Erwin
How would you know that the particular question does not have a correct answer, based on the score you get--69%-- It does not sound convincing to me. Even you get that question rewarded to you, it does not mean you will get 70% since I believe it is calculated using a statistical analysis

Re: Private Addressing over Distances [7:44946]

2002-05-25 Thread Jarred Nicholls
Craig, You are absolutely correct, and I was well aware of each of the important concepts and points you made. I was simply saying a random address to use for my example, but thanks =) Jarred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45061t=44946

Re: Jeff Doyle's official response re: lab rats [7:45001]

2002-05-25 Thread nrf
Like I said, things might be fine for guys like us who have stable jobs and good prospects. But again, for those who might not be in that kind of a position whose financial position is getting a bit precarious and therefore need to find decent work, it doesn't help when you have guys going