i need simple vpn connection [7:57924]

I have a dsl modem at my office and my wife uses a cable modem at home. I would like to network the two computers (one at each location)with VPN. Can anyone give me a very basic and simple way of connecting using either a software ( vpn-dial in ) or inexpensive hardware ? _

Re: Is it worth it to pursue CCIE R&S and CCIE Security [7:57923]

I think it is one of those certs that people go, "Wow, how hard was that". That is, if the person has any clue about IT. All the cert does is allow a potential employer some idea of what you can do. By passing the CCIE you show that you understand Cisco products, you can think/reason quickly and yo

Apparent packet loss... [7:57922]

I need to trouble shoot some apparent packet loss on a 7206VXR with a NSE-1. Weve had some folks downstream of us say that doing traceroutes to their network through us that packets are dropping on our router. I'd like to find a way to actually see if this is the case. I'm kind of concerned that i

RE: Weird MC3810-VCM6 error [7:57916]

Well, I know I don't have the V model, but I didn't know that a high performance VCM shows up as a regular VCM unless a V model and a VOIP image are used. If someone can confirm this, then I'd rather keep this card because at the price I paid it is a bargain. Thanks. -Original Message- Fro

Re: Is it worth it to pursue CCIE R&S and CCIE Security [7:57920]

> > > > That makes me question myself whether if it is worth it to pursue > > the CCIE R&S and CCIE Security given the market condition. These > > guys have years of experiences and "certified" and are without jobs. > > I would have virtually no chance with people like them even if I am > > CCIE c

ppp multilink problem [7:57919]

Hi Group, As the output of the show dialer command shows it, my ISDN router r2 has successfully established an ISDN connection to r5 and the ppp multilink is working fine. The problem is that i am receiving a cryptic console message every few seconds and it looks like an error message. Can some on

ppp multilink problem [7:57918]

Hi Group, As the ouput of the show dialer command shows it, my ISDN router r2 has successfully established an ISDN connection to r5 and the ppp multilink is working fine. The problem is that i am receiving a cryptic console message every few seconds and it looks like an error message. Can some one

RE: Weird MC3810-VCM6 error [7:57916]

This is just a hunch, but could you possibly have a high performance VCM in a non-V3 MC3810 (i.e., MC3810 or MC3810-V)? It will say on the back of the chassis what type it is. Only the V3 model supports the high performance VCM, so using one in a non-V3 might cause that error... James Willard [EMA

Re: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741]

sorry, i was out of town the past few days in sunny detroit. sounds like we agree - the answer is "it depends." thanks all. - Original Message - From: "Elwood P. Suggins" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:00 PM Subject: RE: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741] > huh.. i g

Weird MC3810-VCM6 error [7:57916]

Hi group. I'd like to know if anyone else has seen this strange error in MC3810 with VCM6. Basically, if I load an IOS that has no Voice feature, the card is detected as. 1 6-DSP(slot2) Voice Compression Module(v01.K0) and the router boots fine. If I load any image with Voice, the card is detected

Re: Absolute minumum Lab setup [7:57879]

At 2:30 PM + 11/22/02, Mic shoeps wrote: >Dear all. > >What would be the absuolute minimum lab equipment setup for the CCIE R&S lab >without sacrifying crucial key elements? Some say I only need three 2501s >and a 3550. Others say I would need five 2521s, two 2620s, and one 3550. >There are so

Re: ISDN PRI and CCIE lab [7:57868]

You dont need PRI for the CCIE R&S nor CCIE Security labs. For the C&S lab, I think it does have a PRI in it, but Im not sure. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Voice: 702-968-5100 FAX: 702-968-5104 Message Po

RE: Is it worth it to pursue CCIE R&S and CCIE Security [7:57913]

IMHO, it is certainly worth it to continue on your path. This economic condition will not last forever. Sooner or later solid technical people will again be in demand. Maybe not like it was during the boom, but for sure an environment where well-trained, decent people will easily be able to find

Re: AS5300 Configuration Problem [7:57828]

you probably want to test with a ppp client like windows DUN client. ""Mamoon Dawood"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All, > > =20 > > I'm doing my first AS5300 installation, after configuration, I did the > first connection test by using my notebook and ope

Re: OT: Is it worth it to pursue CCIE R&S and CCIE Security [7:57911]

Adrian, Plz do not occupy yourself with these thoughts. You are about to go for ur labs, just go and pass them. You have lot of thime to think afterwards what is right and wrong. Dont forget that ur Double CCIE plus Oracle 9i certified staus gives u incredible edge over any candidate. So shred all

mpls ios files /special [7:57910]

I'm unable to find the original posting on the location of the mpls files for the 25xx series @ cisco.com I remember someone posting them on here but the original post is not in the groupstudy.archives had a search in the specials dir on cisco.com but to no avail.. does anyone know the location

OT: Is it worth it to pursue CCIE R&S and CCIE Security [7:57908]

Hi Everyone, My CCIE R&S lab is scheduled for December 2002 and Security is scheduled for January 2003. As the exam is approaching fast, I am beginning to wonder whether it is worth it to pursue the certification for several reasons. Let me explain 1) I just graduate with a Master degree in

RE: bandwidth vs. latency [7:57899]

Mirza, Timur wrote: > > does anyone have a good reference (e.g., white paper) on the > nature of > bandwidth vs latency & the distinction bet/ the two? Well, the distinction is easy. They don't mean the same thing at all. A good site is Merriam Webster's online dictionary. The 2nd definition for

Re: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]

I've seen some stuff on Cisco, but it has only been for the 7500, 1, and 12000 series routers. I haven't read too closely, but it may only be for failover for RPs within the same chassis. It also seems to require the 12.0(22)S code, I'm not sure where that train was rolled into the 12.1 or 12

Re: Absolute minumum Lab setup [7:57879]

Mic, Here's the basics of what you need: Three Cisco 2501 routers Two Cisco 2503 routers One Cisco 2511 router One Cisco 2522 router One 2620 router One 2610 router Catalyst 3550 ISDN Simulator + misc. cables, modules, etc. Add a little ATM rack time, and you're good to go. thanks, -Brad Ellis

Re: Firewall Question [7:57893]

MADMAN wrote: > > money no object, hardware based > > money an object, CBAC works well > > no moe money, ACLs > > Dave With such a small site, personal firewall software on each of the computers might be a good option too. That could work out to be pretty cost-effective and certainly eas

Bootflash on an msfc [7:57903]

I'm having real problems booting an msfc on a 6509 Whenevere it boots and i do a show version it only displays the ROM: software loaded For all intents and purposes it seems fine, you can create vlan interfaces, you can create access lists and it routes fine, however it doesn't dispay the bootflash

Re: EBGP and ip unnumbered [7:57901]

lucky you. I have my routers set up and this was an easy Q&D yes it can be done. you need: the proper interface configurations the proper bgp configurations the proper static routes, since the BGP peer addresses are not directly connected. in a way, this is much like the "bgp practice labs ov

EBGP and ip unnumbered [7:57901]

Folks, Anyone have any sample configs of 2 peers doing EBGP with both interfaces using ip unnumbered and pointing to loopback addresses? I don't even know if this can be done. Daren Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57901&t=57901 ---

Host your site for just 20$/year [7:57900]

[TABLE NOT SHOWN] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57900&t=57900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTE

bandwidth vs. latency [7:57899]

does anyone have a good reference (e.g., white paper) on the nature of bandwidth vs latency & the distinction bet/ the two? Timur Mirza Principal Network Engineer Network Planning & Engineering, West Region 15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, California 92618 Verizon Wireless 949.286.6623 (o) 949.

RE: Firewall Question [7:57893]

Spend no money and do this, read my how to here http://www.homenethelp.com/openbsd/bsd-firewall.asp This box can then be also used for a IDS so you can track the hacking I have had plenty of people email me saying it works great it is simple and written so boneheads like me can understand it. So i

RE: VPNs Cisco vs. Microsoft [7:57881]

One the flip side of things I would say microsoft over cisco. I think the real question to answer is are you authenticating location to location like a tunnel mode (then cisco is best), or are you authenticating remote users (then microsoft is best). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/

hsrp & isl trunking [7:57896]

In my Cisco Academy class, we are doing an lab with a lot of different topics rolled into one lab. We have 2 routers set up with hsrp and has a virtual ip address. Now a 4000 switch has 4 vlans configured on it and to use isl trunking to the hsrp routers. These routers have 4 subinterfaces on the f

Re: Firewall Question [7:57893]

money no object, hardware based money an object, CBAC works well no moe money, ACLs Dave James Gruggett wrote: > > I have a friend that has a T1 going into his 1700 series cisco router. > His ISp has stated that someone has hacked into his Win2k server and > that he must put a firewall i

PIX 515 and HP Openview [7:57894]

I have a HP open view server on inside interface of my pix 515, to check the status of Firewall Outside Interface, HP OV send icmp to outside interface of the firewall, the issue is we are not getting reply from outside interface of the FW, although i have permiting icmp echo and echo reply via ICM

Firewall Question [7:57893]

I have a friend that has a T1 going into his 1700 series cisco router. His ISp has stated that someone has hacked into his Win2k server and that he must put a firewall in place. Do you reccomend a software or hardware based firewall and what type. The network consist of 1 server, 1 switch, ans 10

RE: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]

s vermill wrote: > > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > Hale Nick wrote: > > > > > > Scenario: > > > Cat 6509 (SW 5.5(16)) with MSFC (Version 12.1(1)E). > > > The MSFC has over 15 vlans. > > > The vlan in question has over 60 active devices. > > > There is one device that when pinged (datagr

RE: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]

Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > Hale Nick wrote: > > > > Scenario: > > Cat 6509 (SW 5.5(16)) with MSFC (Version 12.1(1)E). > > The MSFC has over 15 vlans. > > The vlan in question has over 60 active devices. > > There is one device that when pinged (datagram size does not > > change the result

OT: V.92 debugging [7:57890]

(sorry for the OT) folks, I am trying to find out why I am unable to establish a V.92 connection to a AS5300 with IOS 12.2(11)T. What debug command can I use to see why it does not get V.92? Thank you, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57890&t=57890 --

RE: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]

Hale Nick wrote: > > Scenario: > Cat 6509 (SW 5.5(16)) with MSFC (Version 12.1(1)E). > The MSFC has over 15 vlans. > The vlan in question has over 60 active devices. > There is one device that when pinged (datagram size does not > change the result) it produces a source quench. Source quench co

Re: RE: Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator issues. [7:57495]

What is the limitation of a PIX with a VPN Accerator card? > > From: "lounelson" > Date: 2002/11/21 Thu PM 08:59:22 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator issues. [7:57495] > > I note you said 200 users > The 3005 is limited to 100 simultaneous user > > http://ww

RE: VoIP over IP-VPN [7:57880]

I am using a Cisco 3002 hardware client with a 3000 series gateway from NY to Malaysia... True VPN / IPsec between the 2 sites... We put VoIP across this VPN, and it works unbelievably well. So much better than we even hoped it would. We have an E1 on the Malaysian end and a T1 on the NY end... So

RE: Cisco Serial CrossOver Cable [7:57877]

Go to http://www.kg2.com/cables.html The cables are around $15.00 each if you need them. -Original Message- From: Ernesto Diaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Serial CrossOver Cable [7:57877] Hi everyone! Does any

RE: VPNs Cisco vs. Microsoft [7:57881]

Cisco support ipsec over tcp, very hany for remote access vpn through firewalls. it also easy to set up CA for certificate authentication, secureID ect. In short the Cisco VPN product is very easy to use, set up, and it works pretty well. Having said that I don't have a lot of MS vpn experience,

Re: Cisco Serial CrossOver Cable [7:57877]

Here is a situation, I have a Cisco 4000 router connected to a 2500 router back to back with a DTE, DCE cable (4000 50 pin serial and 2500 60 pin serial.) At this time the cable side that is connected to the 4000 is DCE and the 2500 side is DTE. Does any body know how to swap that around (change th

Re: Cisco Serial CrossOver Cable [7:57877]

DTE DCE If you want to make your own look up the specs in the hardware manual on line. Dave Ernesto Diaz wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > Does anyone know the pinout for a Cisco Serial Crossover Cable (for > interconnection of the routers via the serial ports) > > Thanks in advance > > >

VPNs Cisco vs. Microsoft [7:57881]

Can anyone shed some light on what you feel are some pros & cons between the Microsoft Server VPN and VPNs through a 3005. I know one is L2TP/IPSec Microsoft will not do Tunnel Mode. Thanks, Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57881&t=57881 -

VoIP over IP-VPN [7:57880]

Hi All - I am wondering if anyone here has VoIP working well over IPSec tunnels? Cisco said this could be done, but I am not sure how this approach works in a practical internet enviroment? Thanks! TN Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57880&t=57880

Absolute minumum Lab setup [7:57879]

Dear all. What would be the absuolute minimum lab equipment setup for the CCIE R&S lab without sacrifying crucial key elements? Some say I only need three 2501s and a 3550. Others say I would need five 2521s, two 2620s, and one 3550. There are so many types of 2500 & 2600 series that I really don'

Re: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]

hi, some real stupid question... what is the default gateway for all the device`s... the source-quench should only come from the device that is bieng pinged...(ie the server itself ),these errors would not show up on the switch as the packets are getting through ok and it is the server that is n

Cisco Serial CrossOver Cable [7:57877]

Hi everyone! Does anyone know the pinout for a Cisco Serial Crossover Cable (for interconnection of the routers via the serial ports) Thanks in advance Ernesto Diaz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57877&t=57877 -

Re: Confused from London [7:57780]

We beat the Ozzies at rugby and we'll do the same at soccer in Febuary. As for the cricket, well its not over yet.. ""Peter Kingston"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 5 games of cricket Between Australia and England have just commenced... > Australia won the f

Re: Router forwarding directed broadcasts [7:57780]

[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] I think that if you send a capture of the config(, obtaineed by typing sh run at the enable mode) a solution to your problem might be found. Of coure, in interests of security, please feel free to change names and passwords. -Nak

Re: CCIE Home Lab Materials and Equipments [7:57810]

You will be tested on Catalyst 3550 not 5000. ""Godswill HO"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group, > > I want to get it right the first time. I intend > setting up my CCIE lab at home. I will appreciate if > someone that have taken the lab or preparing for it

VPNv4 implemenation on backbone using BGP [7:57873]

Hi All, Can anyone of you pls provide me with a link which explains the behaviour/functionality of P router (w.r.t. BGP and handling of communities , where P acts as a route-reflector) in detail. I am having this kind of topology CE--PE---P---PE--CE Thanks, Vinay DISCLAIMER: This message is p

RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]

Ok Eric, I just have the impression that something was wrong because my name was just after what you wrote. Thanks and Best Regards, Alaerte Eric Polin em 11/21/2002 07:31:59 PM Para: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" cc: Assunto:RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME

RE: Pix question [7:57869]

gotta put static or nat translation statements for ANY traffic. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ramesh c Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix question [7:57869] Configuration nameif ethernet0 outsid

Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]

Cat 6509 (SW 5.5(16)) with MSFC (Version 12.1(1)E). The MSFC has over 15 vlans. The vlan in question has over 60 active devices. There is one device that when pinged (datagram size does not change the result) it produces a source quench. All other devices on the vlan respond to pings ok. >From th

Pix question [7:57869]

Configuration nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 interface ethernet0 10baset interface ethernet1 10baset interface ethernet0 100basetx ip address outside 209.165.201.2 255.255.255.248 ip address inside 192.168.7.0 255.255.255.0 ip