@!#$ OFF
This has sod all to do with passing the CCIE exam!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kenny Sallee
Sent: 08 August 2001 00:03
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Dedicated T1 to Japan
Does anyone here know the
do you have ip classless enabled?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tim Ross
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 15:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GroupStudy LAB
Subject: All-in-one CCIE Lab Study Guide: Lab #4
I have started going through th
As long as you are not using PAT. I came across this a while ago. The
dynamic port allocation is a real killer!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 23:14
To: Aaron K. Dixon
Cc: Jim Bond; [EMAIL PRO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Derek Chung
Sent: 17 September 2000 13:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Questions...
Question 1:
Router A and Router B are configured to route IP to each other over a serial
line. Host A is connecte
I had all four of these on my ccie 350-001.
This is breaking the NDA, if of course, you have actually taken the exam.
Please don't post things like this again. It just shows ignorance.
Andy Lennon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Derek C
This is on a UK/Europe switch so this is the correct router.
Try "ppp auth pap callin" to avoid trying to authenticate your far end
router (providing they use pap).
change the ip route statement to:
"ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 interface bri0 perm" to fix the routing issue
let us know how you get o
running now).
Andy Lennon,
CCNP/DP MCSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
CiscoDiety
Sent: 01 September 2000 15:14
To: andrew lennon; 'Erick B.'; 'Groupstudy Cisco'
Subject: Re: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE.
Configuring
good ole 3810's :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javier Contreras
Sent: 01 September 2000 11:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Voip - New QOS features needed
Hi
If you are using 36XX or 26XX, cisco recomends 12.1.3a, it works fin
have you tried subinterfaces ?
Andy Lennon
CCNP/DP MCSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Erick B.
Sent: 01 September 2000 06:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Groupstudy Cisco
Subject: Re: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE.
Each cisco interface
Hi all
One of the questions in the survey is who do you work for.
Bearing in mind that Cisco employees have a different pass-mark, need I say
any more?
BTW passed my CCIE design written today :)
Now only if I didn't have to wait so long to retake my r/s lab
Andy Lennon
CCNP/DP MCSE
-
well, im sorry you failed but...
is it a bunch of bull cos u failed?
ccnp/ccdp is very different as i am sure you now know why
if it was so highly overrated then why did you fail?
If you do pass, then all that has happened is that you are now eligible to
request a lab exam, and if you got 60
WIC's are NOT hot-swappable, but port adapters are 7200's are. On 7500's
port adapters connected via VIP cards are not hot swappable either (even if
they are not screwed in).
Andy Lennon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tim O'Brien
Sent:
Hi,
The 2500 does not do xmodem. If when in boot mode you cannot erase the
flash manually it is either knackered or there is also the possibility that
the main-board jumper for the flash has been set to write-protect. Fwom the
message that you are getting, I would check this.
HTH
Andy Lennon
C
a nice bit of fun, good to releive the mind before my ccie lab in 12hrs
time
andy
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lennon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 August 2000 20:23
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Friday Follies Exten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: 05 August 2000 11:21
To: Cisco Mail List; Kane
Subject: RE: Friday Follies Extended Through Saturday
Interesting. I have now removed the access-list that was applied inbound to
the por
The best route is actually determined by the longest prefix match
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Atif Awan
Sent: 14 June 2000 22:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF !!!
Priority does not affect route sele
knackered media/mau, both router say the naum is shot. try new ports on the
mau, check for good connections etc.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
m. jean stockton
Sent: 10 June 2000 13:07
To: Matt Shell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Hi all,
you may notice that one of the questions on the survey is about who you work
for. This is what determines your pass mark. Higher for Cisco employees and
the standard pass mark for all others.
That is all there is to it.
HTH
Andrew Lennon, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE
To get the doc cd working under win2k, do the following.
Completely uninstall the doc cd s/w etc. Using regedt32 or regedit, change
the following key value:
hklm/software/microsoft/ie4/setup
Change it from %program files% to c:\program files\Internet Explorer (c:
being whichever drive ie4 or 5 is
1 and 0, don't need anything else for computing as it all stems from there!
regs,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Phil Barker
Sent: 14 June 2000 03:32
To: tazar Ing; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General Theory
42 is about as clo
On the subject of IP adressing, what about the 64.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255
block ?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: 07 June 2000 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NAT for ISPs
>Howard,
>I seem to rem
This is due to the dns timeouts. Try adding a "no ip domain-lookup" or
specify an "ip name-server a.b.c.d" in your config. The x.ms * x.ms in the
traceroute shows that the trace has made its final destination.
Regards,
Andrew Lennon, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE
-Original Messa
hink you have longer prefix matches on OSPF than Static Routes. Longer
matches ALWAYS take preference.
To solve, make your static routes more specific than your ospf by either
changing your wildcards in the ospf statements or changing your your static
satements to be more specific than ospf's
You
23 matches
Mail list logo
