Hey would like to run something by the ospf-geeks here. For a little bit
I've
been mulling over OSPF over an IPSec vpn tunnel. I know it can be done with
routers and a GRE tunnel but what about the two actual end devices. Im
currently tinkering with a PIX506 and a VPN Concentrator 3000. Both devi
On Friday 18 July 2003 10:47, you wrote:
> Yes, I have seen it on one of my boxes. It's a hardware problem. Open a TAC
> case and they'll probably RMA it.
>
> Shawn K.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 15:29, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Cool! My cosmic ray machine must be working. Better put on your tinfoil
> hats.
>
> From: Recent escapee from the ex-dot.commer insane asylum
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
> > - jvd 7/1/03 12:32:02 PM >>>
> > >
> > >Hi my Quote button disap
hey all quick q for ya. I have a cat 6509 sitting on the core of a 5000
users
network with both 100mbit and gigabit links. I have to watch a couple boxes
on a very busy vlan for session data for analysis, but there is s much
traffic on the specific vlan that it literally made my little laptop
hey all quick q for ya. I have a cat 6509 sitting on the core of a 5000
users
network with both 100mbit and gigabit links. I have to watch a couple boxes
on a very busy vlan for session data for analysis, but there is s much
traffic on the specific vlan that it literally made my little laptop
Hey folks, I just saw a strange incident with a pix 501 in china. To be
breif,
this pix was doing ipsec to a site in america, PAT and smtp port
redirection.
One day out of the blue, all the access-list entries and crypto match rules
were gone.. poof! all the access-groups were too. The static com
appreciated!
Thanks VERY VERY much in advance,
David Cooper
eosyn at linuxmafia dot org (no Im not a mafia person or '31337')
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7052&t=7052
--
FAQ, list
Heya,
I'm at a site right now where I we have a central Cat 6509 as core with a
couple fiber blades and 4 more 10/100 rj45 blades (ACK). This switch does
the core routing within the network. It also is the main switch for the
servers at the site. The fiber blades go out to closets with st
how much for the carpet fuzz?
On Saturday 05 May 2001 16:54, Jon wrote:
> I liberated a full-size rack from work, so now I have a half-size rack I'd
> like to get rid of. It's meant to hang from the wall and hold a bunch of
> gear -- this isn't one of those cheap racks from Musician's Friend.
Hi again,
I'm mulling over a possible issue on a (WINDOWS) lan here that uses a
Cisco 6509 with a few vlans. One of the vlans is accessable via 2 ports
(GE).
On one side of the vlan, there is the subnet master browser and, on the
other
side of the switch are more clients. These clients
Hiya,
Im somewhat stumped here and could use some help from the folks.
I have a 2610 doing NAT over a cablem modem and really need to tighten it up
just a bit. The router is communicating with the internet via e0/0 and the
internal network is running over s0/0 ( till I get an NM-1E ).
Ya know, that fixed it right up. For some reason I was thinking it would
cause troubles if I advertised the same network out but now that I read into
it, thats not the context at all. Strange.. now for ospf :)
Look to the south for a large mushroom cloud in the sky.
Thanks again,
Dave
On Wedn
Okey dokey :)
3 routers:
eo1 Cisco 2516 2 Serials s0 and s1, 1 ethernet (hub).
e0: 172.16.1.40/16
s0: 10.10.10.10/24 (creative huh?) s0.1
s1: 10.10.30.1/24 s1.1
eo2 Cisco 1602r 2 Serials (56K 4 wire dsu), 1 ethernet
e0: 192.168.1.1/24
s0: 10.10.30.2/24 s0.1
s1: 10.10.20.2/24 s1.1
eo3 Cisco 2
Hey again,
I've run into a wall here trying to configure a small test lab. The problem
is, In my network of three routers, No routing protocol will traverse one
serial link. The serial link in question is up/up and ip traffic will pass
across it. static routes work, dynamic routes aren
It varies per Application you are using..
Check here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html
this has various procedures to break with and has helped alot everytime I
destroyed my lab. :)
HTH
Dave
On Monday 02 April 2001 17:06, Nathan Chessin wrote:
> Is there an IOS command that will
get a couple DTE-DCE cables and connect with routers with that. Its called
back-to-back. Pretty simple really. You can get the cables from ebay or some
of the other folks in the list have commercial sites for them.
hth.
Dave
On Friday 30 March 2001 19:29, Luke Everett wrote:
> I have 3 Ci
hey again,
I've done this. I got the info on back-to-back at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/75.html
This should be about all ya need :)
Dave
On Friday 30 March 2001 12:46, John Huston wrote:
> I would appreciate someone's knowledge on how to setup two Cisco 1750's
> each h
Hiya,
This is due to when the user dials up, the Win32 pc sets a default route to
the ISP. This route is taken over any others in the delivery of packets. The
best way I have found around this is to add static routes back to my LAN
while dialed up. This is very common.
Hope this helps
just what I was looking for :)
Thanks,
Dave
On Wednesday 14 March 2001 23:34, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >Hey all,
> >
> > I've been reading into BSCN here lately with Cisco press
> >books. In the book
> >there is a fairly detailed discussion of OSPF. I'm not in the least
> > opposed to le
Hey all,
I've been reading into BSCN here lately with Cisco press books. In the book
there is a fairly detailed discussion of OSPF. I'm not in the least opposed
to learning it. One thing I would like to understand is why an organization
would use it. Is this used in ISP's? What are the
d that the
administrator of the hosts over there build a static route to the foriegn
network address to help out although I don't suspect it will help alot from
an analytical point of view. :)
Thanks for all the help! - Sorry for the delay in replies.
Dave
On Thursday 01 March 2001 00:17, David Coop
On Thursday 01 March 2001 21:17, Santosh Koshy wrote:
> I am presently using the command "dialer load-threshold 1 either" to no
> sucess...
>
> "Daniel Cotts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA11009@EXCHANGE1">news:303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA11009@EXCH
Hey folks,
I've got an issue at work I'd like to run by you. I sent a request to
cisco's forum but have yet to hear an answer from anyone. We have a Cisco
2610 router in Ireland. This router has 1 Ethernet connected to a local
segment and s0 point-to-point frame relay going to chicago,
23 matches
Mail list logo
