If anyone is interested in forming a study group or be a study partner in
the Hampton Roads (or Tidewater area), please contact me offline.
Thanks.
Elmer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29563t=29563
--
FAQ, list
PM Elmer Deloso wrote:
(Corrected message for an earlier posting.)
Karen,
I have a feeling that you've been in some kind of teaching role
before based on how you explain concepts. This makes the picture
complete especially when revisiting the previous post by Shawn Kaminski.
However, when you
Intranet endstations, will the same multicast MAC address stay the
same?
Thanks for your input.
Elmer Deloso
-Original Message-
From: richard beddow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: about multicast address! [7:29057]
An IP
Howard,
I'm sure that most, if not all, of the participants on this list
will be very interested in this Quest Project, and I for one
would definitely invest in each layer package that will be
offered. Like the saying goes, you get what you pay for. I doubt
if anyone will question the worth of
Pm Elmer Deloso wrote:
Richard,
This is an excellent post, but i need a little bit of clarification on...
1. I've understood multicast as at Layer 3, so I'm confused when you say
that a 25-bit prefix is assigned for the Layer 2 frame. I can't seem
to
follow what is happening in multicast
Elmer Deloso would like to recall the message, about multicast address!
[7:29057].
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29138t=29057
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
SEPARATOR ***
On 12/13/2001 at 12:00 Pm Elmer Deloso wrote:
Richard,
This is an excellent post, but i need a little bit of clarification on...
1. I've understood multicast as at Layer 3, so I'm confused when you say
that a 25-bit prefix is assigned for the Layer 2 frame. I can't seem
this in detail like
framing with
Well known router/switch interfaces.
Thanks for your input.
Elmer Deloso
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28186t=28186
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
By Distance-vector he means that the router receiving Type3 LSA
From the ABR simply accepts this route advertisement by taking
Into account only the cost ( i.e. distance) to this route and the direction
(i.e.Vector via this ABR) to reach it, instead of running the SPF algorithm
As it should being
If so, please post the ISBN.
Can't seem to find it online.
Thank you.
Elmer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25927t=25927
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Thanks for the clarification. I do have the
Designing Routing and Switching Architectures (haven't read it yet)
But not the Designing Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching.
That's on my wish-list for X-mas.
BTW - Wiley.com doesn't seem to list the Building Service Provider Networks
The audio recordings are very good, except for the OSPF series.
Just listening to the tapes reveals the presenter was so self-conscious
There was practically nothing to learn that's not already mentioned
In the BSCN book. Unlike the EIGRP and BGP series.
My own thoughts.
Elmer
-Original
Hi,
From this link
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn13136.shtml
it sounds like a NIC card driver issue.
HTH,
Elmer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23378t=23378
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/3.html#14.0.
I'll let you know when I get this Case study running at home tomorrow.
HTH,
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: routerjocky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Elmer Deloso
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF-Doyle
This company was the original CBT Systems, and somehow
Ended up with a deal with FORE (not the one that is now
Marconi). But their tactics in selling these Official
Training materials are VERY aggressive that you'd have
Better chances of getting a super deal from a used-car
Lot. Total waste of
somehere in my studies because
I can't explain these to myself.
Thank you.
Elmer Deloso
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21658t=21658
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
download?)
Elmer Deloso
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21659t=21659
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
is then subsequently held to backfill the
BDR position. No adjacencies should be torn down during this process,
though new ones may be created between the set of non DR/BDR routers and the
new BDR.
Hope that helps.
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/2/2001 at 8:10 AM Elmer Deloso
For even better, go to the source:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1793.txt
Elmer Deloso wrote:
Hi.
On Routing TCP/IP's page 555 there is an output of show ip ospf
virtual-link
That has these two info:
1.DoNotAge LSA not allowed
2.Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed)
Can someone
how this could be any more logical.
What do you find illogical. Also, I'm not sure what role R2 plays in
this scenario?
Pete
On 17 Sep 2001 11:04:38 -0400, Elmer Deloso wrote:
I understand this principle, but there is no logic with the scenario
On convergence as outlined in BSCN as follows
Hi, all.
I'm trying to understand the PURPOSE and LOGIC behind OSPF BDR
Promotion to DR. Let's say R1 is DR and R2 is BDR connected via Ethernet
Link. If I disconnect the cable, this would mean the BDR will promote itself
To DR status, even though the DR never went down. So when I reconnect the
that help?
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/17/2001 at 8:55 AM Elmer Deloso wrote:
Hi, all.
I'm trying to understand the PURPOSE and LOGIC behind OSPF BDR
Promotion to DR. Let's say R1 is DR and R2 is BDR connected via Ethernet
Link. If I disconnect the cable, this would mean
What I did was remove the Flash and put it in one with
An Ethernet port, download the new IOS, then put it back
Into the 2502.
HTH.
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to
Just a heads up on these two choices:
Snort = FREE.
Mantrap/Manhunt = over $100k.
Personally, i'll settle for Snort and IPtrap.
HTH,
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Good
Hi,
Can someone tell me if a Cat 1800 will do just as well for a home lab as the
more expensive Cat 3920? It seems to support all of the Bridging
technologies that are available in the 3920 series. I'm just looking for a
cheaper solution. If there are any important issues that you know of with
and tries to use IP only.
Ayers, Michael 07/11/01 12:12PM
Those were either auto generated, or picked up from reading frames on the
wire.
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Deloso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
(480) 539-2203
(800) 272-3077
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Deloso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: IPX Network addresses [7:11990]
Thanks for all the responses. This is the only IPX speaking box
type!?
Priscilla
At 10:46 AM 7/12/01, Hire, Ejay wrote:
Each different frame type acts as a separate broadcast domain, thus they
have different network numbers.
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Deloso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi, group.
I just noticed that after installing NetWare server, it gave me this info
regarding types of IPX frames:
Frame type Network address
Ethernet_802.2 3D410DCD
Ethernet_802.3 1E0F4F9E
Ethernet_SNAP FF994BB0
Ethernet_II D393B805
For the
Tony,
Seriously speaking, i thought at this point you'd be the hunted and not the
hunter when it comes to jobs. Or has teh CCIE market become saturated?
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: Tony Medeiros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
