Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6936]

2001-06-02 Thread Me
ed to a ring here and a bar there... > Guess there will always be work for IT folks :) So the reason why Cisco should be working on a GUI is so that there will be work for pple like you ? > > One last thing.. could you send me some mail offline from this mailing list? > You are listed as a

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6937]

2001-06-02 Thread Me
Guess I have not read any CCNA books recently I won't even bother to flame you for the "joke??" . When you find me a unix admin who can plan the deployment of 50,000 workstation and successfully roll it out, we can discuss again ""Michael L. Williams""

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6976]

2001-06-03 Thread Me
#x27;s too complicated !!! In any case, don't bother emailing me because talking to you would be a absolute waste of time if you cannot understand a simple news-server, how can I even discuss anything technical with you ha ha ha. Let's end this... ""Michael L. Williams"&

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6977]

2001-06-03 Thread Me
We never knew , cause it is the only instance I ever know of that a trainee has been "kicked" out of class for not meeting pre-requisite... ""Brian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > training for a mouse, how does an admin like that make it through the day? > > Br

Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:7020]

2001-06-03 Thread Me
given is nothing but fake names, e-mail addresses, and > credentials the whole time. > > Please don't waste anymore bandwidth until you're ready to stop hiding > behind a shield of anonymity. > > "Me" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P

Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]

2001-06-04 Thread Me
Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) ""MIRSKY Carl"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We > ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no > one OS that can d

port needed open for dlsw (tcp encap) [7:34981]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp ports do I need open in an access-list to allow dlsw to work? TCP 2065 by itself is not enough. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34981&t=34981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subsc

DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
I can see the the dlsw connection is useing tcp 2065, but seems to be another piece missing... (dlsw peer works fine without acces-list). Any help would be appreciated... I fly to SJ tomorow for the lab on Monday... Thanks! R0-R1#sh access-list 101 Extended IP access list 101 permit udp a

Re: DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
DLSW uses port 2065 for read, and 2067 for write > > CM > > - Original Message - > From: "ME" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 10:05 PM > Subject: DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985] > > > > I can see the the dlsw connection i

transport input none [7:34996]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
Does anyone know the affect of entering 'transport input none' on the console line? Many of the IPExpert labs show it in their answer keys, but niether they, not Cisco really explains why. (That I can find.) Cisco shows it in many of their show run examples everywhere - with no explanation.

Re: transport input none [7:34996]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
That makes it sound like I would make the console port useable, but that it not what happens. I know that it will stop all traffic when applied to the async lines, but I don't see any effect on the console port or the aux port. ""somera cecilia"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

Re: port needed open for dlsw (tcp encap) [7:34981]

2002-02-09 Thread ME
tructor for CCIE R/S and Security 5-day class www.ccbootcamp.com > __ > CCIE Security Training > www.netcginc.com/training.htm > > > ""ME"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp po

OT: Network jobs in Dallas, TX? [7:35608]

2002-02-16 Thread ME
I'm new to the Dallas area and recently laid-off. I was wondering if folks here knew of anyone looking for somebody with 10 years network exp. and a CCIE in the Dallas area? If so please reply. Thanks, Mark Egan, CCIE #8775 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3

Re: The proxy problem with pix 525? [7:35603]

2002-02-16 Thread ME
It's always a good idea to hard-code speed and duplex settings. interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 auto interface ethernet2 auto ""cage"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > R--FW--DMZ >| > Inside >| >Proxy > One proxy is connected to the insid

Re: Loading IOS on a 4000M [7:35689]

2002-02-17 Thread ME
I admit to being stuck, I have inherited a 4000M that is blank (no IOS) > and for the life of me I cannot figure out how to get the IOS loaded on > it. The console port is a DB-25 and I do not have a working Ethernet > card for it. I do have a couple np-4t cards though. Speaking of Ethernet >

Re: Keeping Tunnel Up [7:35840]

2002-02-19 Thread ME
mary wan link fails. I mean the > Dial backup works fine with both backup interface and dialer watch-list, but > the tunnenl which was source from the failed serial link would not come up > even though all routes are being learned thru BRI interface and are in > routing table. > > Can s

Re: Current CD Rom Documentation [7:35930]

2002-02-20 Thread ME
Last week they had the latest and greatest Dec 2000 ROM at the lab ;) ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This post gives me a good excuse to break open the most recent doc CD that I > have - dated October 2001. > >

Cisco Announces Global Rollout of New CCIE Security [7:35963]

2002-02-20 Thread ME
Has anyone heard about this one yet? Differing from CCIE Security, the Cisco Security Specialist 1 demonstrates an individual's proficiency in designing, installing, and supporting Cisco-specific security solutions in three core areas of network security: firewalls, intrusion detection systems an

VPN Client 3.x to IOS VPN [7:36708]

2002-02-27 Thread ME
IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not been able to find any information about it published on Cisco's public web site yet. Any idea who might be working on the bleeding edge of IOS VPNs that migh

Re: VPN Client 3.x to IOS VPN [7:36708]

2002-02-28 Thread ME
roduct/software/ios122/122newft/122 t/122t8/ftunity.htm > > Kevin > > ME wrote: > > > IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older > > secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not been > > able to find any information

Re: insufficent memory on a new 1603R, Help!!!!! [7:37082]

2002-03-02 Thread ME
> > SYSTEM INIT: INSUFFICIENT MEMORY TO BOOT THE IMAGE! > > > > On the side of the flash card it says Version: 12.0(14), Image: > c1600-y-mz.120-14, Filename x00028c4. > > I gather the image is run from RAM and ive looked at the cisco website which > says that th

Re: PIX PAT Problem!! Urgent [7:37052]

2002-03-02 Thread ME
What he wants do do works fine. The static command works both ways.. Use the static to define to ip and the port. I use this myself. ""Leslie McIntosh"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > Ivan, > > This is a shot in the dark, but here is what I am > seeing scanning through my PIX book

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread ME
Adding a second IP to the internal host is the only way I know of useing the PIX. ""Rich"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > Why not add an additional ip to the internal host and have two nats? > > - Original Message - > From: "Gaz" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:06 PM

Re: CAT4003 and 3com [7:39084]

2002-03-21 Thread ME
3COM never auto-negotiates properly with Cisco, look for FCS errors on the switch ports. The best solution is to hardcode NICs to FD. The 'easiest' solution is to hardcode the switchports to HD. Mark Egan, CCIE #8775 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings, >

inverse arp

2000-08-28 Thread me
Is there a command to discover ip addresses learn from inverse arp. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to

Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460]

2003-02-05 Thread Me
search for rfc1700 ""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers > > For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc > > Cheers, > > Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/for

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-12 Thread Me
twork. This is the > first time I have done anything like this and I was wanting to know if > anyone had any good pointers they could give me or any commands that I > should beware of or add. > > Thanks, > > Terry O Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.

PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]

2002-04-13 Thread ME
How do you get the PIX to automatically log out the console if someone forgets to log out? The equivalent of exec-timeout in IOS? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41382&t=41382 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscript

Re: PIX Exec-timeout [7:41382]

2002-04-13 Thread ME
This works fine for telnets, but doesn't affect console connections. I would like to automatically timeout a console session after x minutes. ""scott jensen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I apologize for previous incorrect information. (timeout conn) > > Try t

CPU utlization of a single voip cirtcuit

2000-11-09 Thread Yuen Me
Our company is planning to implement VoIP on top of existing cisco network and I'm conducting network audit. Can somebody advise me the resource consumption in term of CPU utilization / Buffer utilization across all platforms (26XX ... 75xx) for a single voip circuit ? My logic if my cu

On-demand pppoe on 1750

2000-11-15 Thread Yuen Me
Hi, I've sucessfully setup pppoe on 1750 for the ADSL line. However it's "always on" nature costs a lot of tariff. How can I change it this pppoe into on-demand so that only when there is packet, ppp session will be brought up. IOS is 12.1 I find nothing related in "vpdn-group" and "int dialer

Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-28 Thread Yuen Me
Hi all, I tend to conclude the following statement and pls confirm whether I'm right: "point to point" subinterface is the only option in the HUB to allow spoke to spoke packet forwarding happen in transparent bridging environment. I've tried physical interface and multipoint subinterface on

RE: Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-29 Thread Yuen Me
x27;s neither a spanning tree issue. All ports in all bridges are in forwarding state. Appreciate if anyone can show me a working config (again spoke to spoke) with hub config other than point to point subinterface Yuenme >From: "Ryan Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: &

RE: Transparent Briding over Frame Relay Hub and Spoke

2000-05-29 Thread Yuen Me
rface Serial0.204 point-to-point ip address 193.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast decnet cost 30 frame-relay interface-dlci 204 bridge-group 1 ! bridge 1 protocol ieee ! >From: "Ryan Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Yuen Me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

New to vlans...HELP [7:59655]

2002-12-20 Thread Me Morpheus
switch is supposed to have 2 vlans, (A and B). I also have a server that is connected to this switch. The requirement that was told to me was that the port connected to the server must be a member of both VLANs and traffic sent from this port must be tagged (for both vlans). The port connected to

Re: I need Boson Cisco Test Pack v3.22 demo for download !

2000-12-04 Thread Deal me In
ot;"Clayton Price"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 90flq2$327$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90flq2$327$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > A lot has been upgraded since 3.22. Let me guess, you can't find a crack > > for anything newer than version 3.22 > &g

Re: Boson vs. Colt ??????

2001-01-11 Thread Deal me In
I think that most of us are very capable of searching and using cracks and I have used them in the past when I feel a program is entirely over priced for no more than it does for me. In the case of the Boson exams they are well worth the $30 to me for all the hard work that is put into them. Some