BGP & Route-maps [7:74424]

Hi all, I have a few problems with configuring route maps in conjunction with BGP. I have configured a community that advertises all networks except two but these two networks are still advertised to the peer after doing the clear ip bgp * command on both peers. I have read in the Cisco book tha

Re: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

HI Eddie, Fred, thanks for your help...I think this most likely is the problem. As I do not have access to teh TFTP server, I am unable to fix it though. cheers, Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74130&t=74100 -

BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

Hi all, I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as follows: TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2 s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1/24. The problem is that while I can ping the TFTP server (10.1.4.3 from Rtr1's e0 interface), I can't

OSPF LSR's [7:61176]

Hi all, just a minor (I think) question. In the OSPF LSR message, why does the LS type have 4 bytes to describe it, when there are only 5 different values? Am I missing something? TIA. cheers, Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61176&t=61176 -

OSPF & Virtual Links [7:60379]

Hi all, I am studying the Cisco text "CCNP Routing" Exam Certification Guide and on page 310 there is an example configuration: Router Jack interface loopback 0 ip address 10.10.10.33 255.255.255.0 router ospf 100 network 172.16.20.128 0.0.0.7 area 0 network 172.16.20.8 0.0.0.7 area 1 area 0 rang

Show int fa0/1 summary [7:58777]

Hi all, we are in the middle of a VoIP deployment using H.323. I have configured the router to allow adequate bandwidth for each H.323 call based on the available codecs etc. That's the background. My problem/issue centers around the interface statistics. When I do a show int fa0/1 summary comman

RE: VoIP data rates [7:56942]

Hi Priscilla, thanks for the help. I have found the chart you referred to and made several calculations - it appears that the bandwidth almost triples when you don't compress the IP, UDP and RTP headers. Here we're pretty certain that a typical dial up modem (either 33.6 or 56kbps) have enough up

VoIP data rates [7:56942]

Hi all, if I am transporting RTP packets over a frame relay network what are my packet sizes? I ask because if you are using a G723.1 codec with an encoding of 6.3kbits/s, then presumably that excludes the UDP, IP and FR headers, but includes the RTP packets. Or does it? Is the converse true in th

Conformed burst and CIR [7:56861]

Hi all, I am just doing to bandwidth allocations for different types of traffic and have some questions. As I understand it, the measuring interval (T) = Bc/CIR, and every interval T a number of tokens equal to Bc is added to the bucket. If you do some basic sums then you'll find that say your CIR

RE: OSPF LSAs [7:54293]

Hi all, thanks all for your comments. It certainly is clearer in my mind that E2 is the external metric cost...i.e. from the ASBR to the destination host, and is not the intra-area cost from the originating host to the ASBR. Also appreciated the last comment about the chapter overall and will ke

OSPF LSAs [7:54293]

I studying the CiscoPress CCNP Routing Book at the moment. There appears to be a contradiction on page 294 and 295. on page 294: the path to another AS can be calculated in one of two ways. The second way (E2) states that the cost of the path to the ASBR is all that is considered in the equation.

Cisco 827 & VPNs [7:52189]

Hi all, I am new to VPNs and have a situation for your suggestion(s). 4 host PCs are to be connected into a Cisco 827H router through the 4-port Ethernet interface. There is a remote site where there is 1 host (that has a DSL card in the host) which requires connectivity through a VPN to the 827

Prefix lists in BGP-4 [7:50091]

Hi all, I am in chapter 9 of the "Cisco CCNP Routing Exam Certification Guide". On page 473, my understanding of the le and ge parameters is that you specify a lower-bound prefix with the keyword "ge" and an upper bound prefix with the keyword "le". This is fine, except for the life of me I can't

Re: TCP & H.225 [7:21519]

Patrick, thanks for your help. Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21625&t=21519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol

TCP & H.225 [7:21519]

Hi all, I am a recent CCNA graduate, and am about to tackle the challenges of the CCNP Routing 2.0 exam. Look forward to asking/providing help where possible! Anyway, I have a question - does anyone know the ITU spec, or RFC that deals with TCP ports for H.225 RAS messages. I know that port 1719