Running Hybrid mode SUPII/PFCII/MSFCII
To my understanding with MLS (PFC 1), the IOS ACL determines the flow mask.
And since it is route once switch many, any packets that match a deny
statement will be denied and the enable packet will never make it. The full
flow entry will not be in the MLS cac
Also do MLS commands on the MSFC do anything for CEF?
-Original Message-
From: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:42 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: CEF on 6500 and ACL??
Running Hybrid mode SUPII/PFCII/MSFCII
To my understanding with MLS (P
With CEF (PFC 2) if there is an adjacency for the destination host, to my
understanding, that packet will never be routed. It should just be rewritten
by the PFC 2 (SP). If this correct then these are my questions.
1. How does an IOS ACL affect the rewrite on the switch?
2. Where on th
and Qs or you get left behind.
Thats why I love this job!
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CEF on 6500 and ACLs [7:63175]
Some comments in-line. It is
If two 10 Base T Ethernet stations transmit at the same they receive data on
there receive pins. Will both stations send out a 32 bit jam sequence?
If both stations do send a jam signal, why is the slot time closely related
to round trip propagation delay? I would think it would be one way.
Ethern
roubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT wrote:
> >
> > If two 10 Base T Ethernet stations transmit at the same they
> > receive data on
> > their receive pins. Will both stations send out a 32 bit jam
&g
> 500 Meters?? It's 2500 meters. In one example of such a network, there can
> be 5 segments, 4 repeaters (hubs), but only 3 segments can have end
> systems. That's the infamous 5-4-3 "rule." It makes a lot of
> assumptions. Really, the
> size of the network depends on round-trip propagation delay
Are you reverse telneting to the line the routers are connected to?
-Original Message-
From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cant establish reverse telnet [7:63660]
It appears that I cannot establish a telnet
Show users would have displayed the line. I think you piped in 'show
session'. I think show session shows outgoing telnet connections. And show
user shows
connections on the lines...vty,aux,con and tty.
-Original Message-
From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February
ou too B.A.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: Ethernet Slot Time and Delay [7:63659]
Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT wrote:
>
> > 500 Meters?? It's 2500 meters.
Trying to connect to another Cisco device via secure shell. I can do it from
the IOS to CATOS. But I do not know the command to go from CATOS to any
other device.
Thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64556&t=64556
-
Reading the CDP vulnerability link, I cannot determine how a hacker can
trigger the attack. Reading the email trail
it seems that you are worried about the info displayed in the frame. If that
is what your company
is trying to avoid, here is an idea. Why not disable it on a per port basis.
That is
I have read a part of this book. It seems to line up with the CIT. Will this
be enough reading material to pass the CIT?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65732&t=65732
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h
exam.
-Original Message-
From: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 7:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is 'troubleshooting campus netwroks' enough for CIT?? [7:65732]
I have read a part of this book. It seems to line up wit
I have read a part of this book. It seems to line up with the CIT. Will this
be enough reading material to pass the CIT?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66017&t=66017
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h
Yes, it is a retransmit. I have already taken the test and passed by the
way! I have also used the book
to pass a couple of Sniffer Test. I think it is great.
___
Priscilla Oppenheimer
www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://ww
Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all access
layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at all
access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad or
JMHO
""Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
> default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all
access
> layer s
Yes there is. From my experience with this I know that ADC sells a modular
SDSL modem. You can use either an ethernet,
RS-530, V.35, or RS-449 interface with this modem. The serial card is FLEX
module with two data ports and 1 DSX port.
The data port interfaces are a mini-SCSI 26 pin port. ADC off
What commands are you typing in? To create a PVC the syntax is
int atm 1
atm pvc 6 0 106 aal5snap
I think you are missing the 'atm' before pvc.
There are several ways to hook the 3640s back to back. If they are within
fastethernet distance limitations you could use the fastethernet interfaces.
-
Try to add atm in front of that.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:23 PM
To: 'Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]
I am using a sample configur
Seventh command protocol ip 10.0.2.2 broadcast
>
> The sixth command is where it fails. It does not recognize the pvc.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:
aaa.bbb.7.250 255.255.255.252 secondary
> ip address 10.1.19.2 255.255.255.0
> atm pvc 1 0 35 aal5snap
> map-group TGN
> appletalk cable-range 10119-10119 10119.2
> appletalk zone ATM
> !
>
> !
> map-list TGN
> ip 10.1.19.1 atm-vc 1 broadcast
> ip aaa.bbb.7.249 a
th command no shutdown
> Fifth command ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
> Sixth command pvc 1 32
> Seventh command protocol ip 10.0.2.2 broadcast
>
> The sixth command is where it fails. It does not recognize the pvc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
I know the thread is about dead but until you get TACACS+ server there are
some commands
you could implement to help the situation. The port is being disabled for a
reason.
You can configure the port to renable after 30 secs. using the command
set errdisable-timeout enable all
set errdisable-timeo
IP helper will send NETBIOS broadcast and change the packet to a unicast to
the address given. But I not
really sure it will solve your problem. I have a few questions before I try
to answer your question.
1. Is there a DHCP server involved?
2. Do have Domain Controllers?
3. Do you want the browse
I tried to telnet to a distant end 3660 router. Connection would timeout. I
was able to ping the router from my PC. The router
could telnet to the router that was between my PC and itself. Ran capture
and the data yielded this
IP Source 10.0.0.1 Destination 10.0.1.2 TCP SYN destination port 2
m 1-6. Sorry for sending this in. I
should of thought about it a little bit more :-(
-Original Message-
From: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Test
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51328&t=51328
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there any people in the Okinawa area going for CCNP?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51329&t=51329
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Is it possible that you are doing a dump on a link that the packet must
transverse to and fro to get to the destination. You stated that you did
this
dump off of one of your core switches. I'm assuming your spanning or port
mirroring
the port or vlan possibly. If these PC's are on separate networ
Evening group,
What I have a TACACS server and the setup we are trying to achieve goes as
follows:
I want the LAN admins to have minimal control on there switches in there
area. We have
accomplished that one the vty ports. Here is the config:
Server
user=test
password=test12
service-shell
set
Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT would like to recall the message, "Exec
shell+console+AAA".
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53601&t=53601
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Evening group,
What I have a TACACS server and the setup we are trying to achieve goes as
follows:
I want the LAN admins to have minimal control on there switches in there
area. We have
accomplished that one the vty ports. Here is the config:
Server
user=test
password=test12
service-shell
set
Evening group,
What I have a TACACS server and the setup we are trying to achieve goes as
follows:
I want the LAN admins to have minimal control on there switches in there
area. We have
accomplished that one the vty ports. Here is the config:
Server
user=test
password=test12
service-shell
set
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exec Shell + Console [7:53661]
9/19/2002 9:40pm Thursday
You could just tell your LAN admins not to change anything on the switches.
""Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
Referencing LAN Switching I have a question concerning routed vs. switched
interfaces on the 6500 running in native IOS mode.
If the diagram on page 832 is correct I'm confused about MLS. Does the
PFC/NFFC have the ability of caching flows between
an interface configured as a switched/routed inte
e information provided by the MSFC. Depending on the
flow mask used, the next flow that comes through with the same destination
address, may be able to be fast-switched (hope I used the right term)
directly to the destination in question.
Did I answer your question? Hope I have helped.
"
How can I configure authorization on the console port?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54282&t=54282
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and No
...
Thanks,
Duncan Wallace
12835 SW Thunderhead Way
Beaverton, Or. 97008
503-646-5707
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
uld
survive a password checker like "Getpass". Of course the console password
was left outside the scope of AAA, as it provided the only way to access the
device if the tacacs/radius server(s) were unreachable.
HTH
Nigel
----- Original Message -
From: "Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
What does this mean. I was looking at table 21-112. The difference between
supervisor engine I and supervisor engine II is that the I has 24 Gbps
switching engine and the
II has three 24 Gbps. Yet the pps remains the same(18Mpps). Is there a
direct correlation between the switching fabric and the
If I enable any vlan interface other than vlan 1 it will not enter an
protocol up state
unless a physical interface that has vlan 'x' assigned to it. Why is that?
vlan database
vlan 2
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 2
no shutdown
!
interface Vlan2
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.0.0.
43 matches
Mail list logo
