but still be able to ping remotely and have the internal users
resolve the name to the internal address?
Thanks in advance to all who offer help!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
I was wondering if some one can help me with the NAT command to allow pptp
to pass through my Cisco 1604. I thought this would get it:
ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 1723 x.x.x.x 1723
where x is my IP scheme, but this does not seem to work for me. Any help is
appreciated.
Stephen
f base here?
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9417&t=9417
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondis
orts needed for the VPN connection.
>
> Let me know if I got close to what you were asking ;) It's getting close
to
> 5 and the coffee isn't working any more.
>
> Allen
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Hoover"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, Jun
Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested.
http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3
Stephen Hoover
DCI Corporation
- Original Message -
From: "CiscoG"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM
Sub
Does the DCN (640-441 for CCDA) test tell you how many answers to give on
the multiple answer questions, or does it simply say "Choose all the apply"?
Or is it a combination of the two?
Thanks!
Stephen
Dallas, Texas
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.gro
Just got back from passing my CCDA as well :) I didn't get any fill in the
blank questions, and the multiple choice questions were a breeze. I had just
the opposite experience with the case studies - the questions I was asked
about them seemed VERY vague in contrast to the questions in the Sybex a
sage -
From: "Trevor Corness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: Another CCDA Passed
> What did you use to study? So far, I've gotten CCNA 1.0 and 2.0 mat
routing info and then know to
switch to that port? I am not seeing where the requirement for the VLAN
comes into play.
If VLANs are required for layer 3 switching, is that pretty much standard
across the industry, or that a Cisco only thing?
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at
derstand that inter-VLAN routing requires L3 switching - but is
the opposite also true? Does L3 switching require VLANs to be defined? If
that is the case, then it would lead me to believe that L3 switching is
based on VLAN info and not on the IP address, but I don't think that is
correct.
. In my previous example, 2 hosts on the
same L3 switch, but on 2 different IP subnets - wouldn't a defined Ethernet
subinterface be each clients respective gateway, and thus normal L3 routing
would occur, just at switch speeds
Thanks again!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Me
your respective gateway was 3 or 4 L3 switches away? That just doesn't
seem practical to me.
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63173&t=63173
--
FAQ, list archives, and
> > -
> > actually it is by doing secondaries, but i would highly recommend doing
> > vlans if possible. keep it clean and simple.
>
>
> one may also configure the physical interfaces as L3 interfaces - just as
> one might do on a router with several ethernet ports.
Oo
ts on L2 switch 1 to
communicate with hosts L2 switch 2, the client has to have a gateway to
forward to correct??
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: Understanding VLANs - how they remove the physica
good idea - possible, but not recommended. This is the "flat
earth" design that Priscilla mentioned - VLANs that extend across the entire
internetwork.
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
- Original Message -
From: "The Long and Winding Road"
To:
Sent: Monday, Febru
VLANs extending beyond the distribution layer switch across the core is
generally not a good idea - possible, but not recommended. This is the "flat
earth" design that Priscilla mentioned - VLANs that extend across the entire
internetwork.
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
-
> Emilia Lambros wrote:
> >
> > Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the
> > routing capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches
> > were connected in that case, then connected to the core,
> > wouldn't that solve the problem of a gateway being 3 or 4 L3
> > switche
dding to the confusion. I think I had it all straight at
Priscilla's posting with this history of LANs.
Thanks!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63224&t=63224
--
FAQ,
figured as a trunk so the router can see all the
> different VLANs. If the router finds a packet on VLAN 10 with a
> destination on VLAN 20, it rewrites the headers for the destination and
> puts it back on the same trunk with VLAN 20 headers.
>
> Remember: replace "layer 3 sw
I apologize for the duplicate posts. I did not realize that when I hit
reply, the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] would post back to the list as
well. That's what I get for being a listener and not a poster :)
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.
here, someone please slap me about :) Otherwise
I am confident this is where my misunderstanding really occurred.
Thanks to EVERYONE who responded - you are all a great group of people to
stick it out until this was beat into my thick skull!!!
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
quot;ip routing."
It didn't appear to do anything, and I know this is only a layer 2 switch -
so my question is - why is it an available option? Just curious, don't
really need to know - hoping someone familiar with this particular switch
could answer it though.
Thanks!
Stephen Ho
Is it possible to specify a port range in IOS 12.0(15) on a Cisco 1604?
Could some point me in the right direction for the command format is
possible?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41001&t=41001
--
FAQ, list arc
Well I was looking for a way to specify a port range in a nat statement.
For example:
standart nat/pat statement.
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.1 21 208.192.100.100 21
I need something like this:
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.1 64300-64400 208.192.100.100
64300-64400
What I a
ist 101 deny udp any any lt 1024
then I start to get a bit hazy as to the returning nat connections for the
clients..perhaps
access-list 101 permit tcp/upd any any range 1025-65535?
I'm assuming also that this will be applied in on the Serial interface.
Any help greatly appreciated!!
it works when I
put their DSU in remote loopback - so I *think* the hardware is sound.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Stephen Hoover
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21848&t=21848
--
FAQ, list archi
Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: T1 install; line protocol going down and up every 30 [7:21863]
> Sounds like a clocking issue to me. Are you using internal or external
> CSU/DSU?
>
> -Eric
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: S
Thanks to all of you who have responded. Here's where I'm at:
The Telco's (two telcos involved) have both said the circuit is sound and
correct. We can loopback both ways down the length of the circuit and it
works ok. To eliminate hardware problems on my end, I have tested this
router and DSU on
Thanks again to all of you who responded. Someone had mentioned the number
of timeslots as being a probable cause. I apologize for forgetting the name
of the person who posted that.
You were close - we had the number of timeslots configured correctly, but
the person on the remote end of the link
Here is a good article on MAC OS X and Postfix..
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/Workbench/eart.index.html
Hope this helps,
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: e-mail server for Ma
30 matches
Mail list logo