RE: IS-IS White Paper [7:51767]

2002-08-22 Thread Turpin, Mark
, do you have it? 2. Do you know by chance of sample labs on ISIS available somewhere? TIA, Elmer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Turpin, Mark Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS-IS White Pape

RE: Multicast...please help [7:51822]

2002-08-21 Thread Turpin, Mark
DJ, Bookmark this link. ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/index.html Typically you have IGMP running, PIM DR's elected, and PIM forwarding routers. Elections are based on this: - Lowest IP = IGMP2 querier - Highest IP = PIM DR - PIM forwarding router = if distance is not equal, lowest distan

RE: ISL/802.1q trunks [7:51745]

2002-08-20 Thread Turpin, Mark
Jon, If you are talking about a single interface having both 802.1q and ISL I'd be very interested as to how a single switchport is going to support ISL and .1q trunking at the same time. To my knowledge, you can only configure one type of trunking on a single switchport interface at a time on t

RE: IS-IS White Paper [7:51767]

2002-08-20 Thread Turpin, Mark
It was I; you can get it at http://gomez.charter.com/~mark There is a link for the ISIS paper at the top. -Mark -Original Message- From: Wes Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IS-IS White Paper [7:51767] Some time bac

RE: What I mean to Cisco [7:51492]

2002-08-16 Thread Turpin, Mark
Bill, Do you have a SMARTnet contract for that 1710? Are you within the warranty period for support? If you're not familiar with SMARTnet take a moment to check it out: http://www.ciscomug.org/resources/files/cmugpresentation-20020206-smartnet.p pt After flipping through that presentation, are

RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

2002-08-13 Thread Turpin, Mark
address use this MLS entry. This mode is used if there are no access lists configured on any of the MLS-RP interfaces" Note the use of the phrase "all flows" in the quote. Turpin, Mark wrote: > > There types of flows: > Destination - per {dest} flow > Source Destination -

RE: Using QoS to Control Utilization [7:51254]

2002-08-13 Thread Turpin, Mark
Yasser, -HQ = 1MBit/s to Internet -HQ has four links to branches, each branch link = 1Mbit/s -Each branch will go through the HQ to reach the HQ, as well as other branches -Each branch will access the Internet through the HQ I hope I've got it right so far!? =] One easy way to do this would be

RE: Using QoS to Control Utilization [7:51254]

2002-08-13 Thread Turpin, Mark
Yasser, So what you're saying is: HQ has a 1Mbit/s link to the Internet HQ has a 1Mbit/s link into a Frame/ATM cloud over which 4 PVC's have been built If Site A needs to access HQ, it should be able to do so without any rate-limiting. If Site A and Site B need to access HQ, they should share t

RE: Multilayer Switching, CCO contradicts itself? [7:51272]

2002-08-12 Thread Turpin, Mark
There types of flows: Destination - per {dest} flow Source Destination - per {source/dest address} pair IP (aka Full) Flow - per {source, dest, protocol and port} set Look under the section labeled Flow Mask Modes hth, -mark -Original Message- From: Sean Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: load balance/share [7:50988]

2002-08-12 Thread Turpin, Mark
route from the PER takes precedence and there is no load sharing. Turpin, Mark wrote: > > Jason, > Lots! Basically your network looks like this: > >PER > m10/ \m10 > AB >m10 > > Let's say a metric of 10 for each link for example? > A->PER = 10

RE: * Routing/Subnetting question [7:51193]

2002-08-12 Thread Turpin, Mark
James, I don't think I'm entirely catching what you're getting at. Probably because I'm a visual guy, and need to see a config. Can you post up an example of this config, and what you're trying to do with inline notes? Here's what it sounds like you're trying to do: int f0/0.1 desc lab net1 i

RE: Traffic geneartor for SNMP [7:51172]

2002-08-12 Thread Turpin, Mark
Are your network management people stating that they are experiencing timeouts when attempting to communicate to your 7500, or through your 7500? I doubt the 7500 is going to be upset about passing UDP traffic through it. The router should just forward the traffic, generally speaking, the router

RE: Most bug-free IOS version for the lab [7:51097]

2002-08-10 Thread Turpin, Mark
I'm using 12.0.18S5, but a lot of my lab gear is refurbished higher end gear. 12.0S or T might be good for you if you have 7200+ gear. On the lab series gear, I've been using 12.1.10 with no problems. Re: 12.2* - I try and stay away from new IOS =] ymmv, -mark -Original Message- From:

RE: Boson Exams [7:51034]

2002-08-09 Thread Turpin, Mark
I used them for the MCAST+QOS (CCIP) exam and the R&S without the desktop protocols section for my C&S written. I passed my tests, but I wouldn't rely on Boson alone =] -Mark -Original Message- From: Vogel Matthew GS-11 CFAO/IRMD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002

RE: load balance/share [7:50988]

2002-08-09 Thread Turpin, Mark
ocol so the routing process would recognize that if one link was down that it needed to send all traffic out the remaining link. Is this clearer? Turpin, Mark wrote: > > Jason, > > Is this your lab netwo

RE: load balance/share [7:50988]

2002-08-09 Thread Turpin, Mark
Jason, Is this your lab network? + PE Rtr + / \ / \ + + RtrA +--+ Rtr B + + \-> Client Networks <-/ With that diagram, or a r

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Turpin, Mark
Scott, I'm sure you know how to configure it, so I'll leave configuration examples out. To get a conceptual overview of how shaping and policing actually works, check out this link: (wrap) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _c/fqcprt4/qcfpolsh.htm as w

RE: Cat2950 VLAN 1 ip address...can't connect [7:50331]

2002-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
I'm referring to trunks, sorry. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: Turpin, Mark Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cat2950 VLAN 1 ip address...can't connect [7:50331] Not sure what you mean. Your not ch

RE: CEF [7:50396]

2002-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
ch_c/xcprt2/index.htm hth, -mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CEF [7:50396] Does anyone have any good links for info on CEF Switching? I'm trying to get a handle on it's u

RE: Cat2950 VLAN 1 ip address...can't connect [7:50331]

2002-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
Lore has it that changing the default vlan can result in leaking. Real life experiences? -Mark -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cat2950 VLAN 1 ip address...can't connect [7:50331] What

RE: BGP Full/Partial tables question [7:50382]

2002-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
It sounds like the individual you are working with is sending you a default route. You might want to make sure he/she understands what partial (aka customer routes) routes really are. If not, you will want to escalate this issue... When they are advertising that one route, see what it is. "sho

RE: Serial Interface Bandwidth [7:50381]

2002-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
A show interface serial 'x' where x = the serial interface's number will tell you a couple things that are important. 1) the 5 minute load average for input/output 2) the timeslots used You can use the timeslots to determine the bandwidth that is technically available, and the load average to