8?
>remove the match clause and just set as-path prepend (if you must) since
>you
>only have the one route. then you can get rid of access-list 30
>
>charles
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>Charles D Hammonds
&g
access-list 30
charles
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Charles D Hammonds
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
that would work, but I would get at least each providers in
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J
M
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network
62.154.91.0
and only
we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network
62.154.91.0
and only want to recieve the default 0.0.0.0
addit9onally i want to prepend our as 23484 outbound to 1 neighbor
does this work?
is there a better way?
router bgp 23484
no synchronization
bg
Brian,
If you have full meshed IBGP sessions then r1 will automatically get the
route to 12.X.X.X in case link to UUNET failed. Or you have to use r1 and r2
as the route reflectors.
Hope this helps,
J.
brian kastor wrote: All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and
To:
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: Sonet, 2 isp's, 2 sites [7:46565]
> All,
>
> I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and AT&T
> into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and
> run IBGP between just th
At 8:23 AM -0400 6/14/02, brian kastor wrote:
>All,
>
>I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and AT&T
>into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and
>run IBGP between just those two. We will have two routers between the two
>running BGP. I g
All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and AT&T
into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and
run IBGP between just those two. We will have two routers between the two
running BGP. I guess it would look something like this:
site1-r1(bg
7, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: load balance 2 isp's-cisco [7:28430]
a question: we have 2 sdsl connections (1.5 and 1 mbps) from 2 different
isp providers. right now, we use one as a back up and connect it manually
if need be. we will be using a cisco 2621 router with 3 ethernet ports, one
for eac
a question: we have 2 sdsl connections (1.5 and 1 mbps) from 2 different
isp providers. right now, we use one as a back up and connect it manually
if need be. we will be using a cisco 2621 router with 3 ethernet ports, one
for each of the dsl routers and one to the firewall. what would be the
>
ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ3ÈÕ 2:40
Ö÷Ìâ: Re: 2 ISP's
>Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use
>floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you
>own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only.
>
>Vinc
I've asked a fair number of questions here, which would only be a
starting point if I were building a solution to this problem -- even
though I don't fully understand the problem yet. The key message I'm
trying to convey is that the first task in developing a solution is
to translate customer
uting will
take place... ? is that fine ? am i clear ?.
1.See 11.0.0.1 is the ip address and that belong a ISP.
2. X1 and X2 are 2 isp's.
3. assume that 11.0.0.1 belongs to X1 isp.
4. the destination ip is 12.0.0.0 (seb server network to be uploaded)
5. i will ha
gt; Hope this helps you to give some more clear cut solution.
>
> Regards
> Atul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Atul Kumar Udupi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
ip address and that belong a ISP.
2. X1 and X2 are 2 isp's.
3. assume that 11.0.0.1 belongs to X1 isp.
4. the destination ip is 12.0.0.0 (seb server network to be uploaded)
5. i will have static path saying that 12.0.0.0 should go to X1 (serial
interface where X1 is termi
r Udupi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
> Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2
ISP's
> on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link
in message
97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
> Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2
ISP's
> on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link.
>
>
>
>
>
> __
gt;
> > >
> > >"Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well
depending
> > >on
;
>> > >
>> > >"Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > >97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > >> Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well
>depen
ihoming will yield a bounty of
information.
- Abe
""Atul Kumar Udupi"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
> Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to termi
f different things with routing as well depending
> >on
> >> the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a
> >> floating static route, etc.
> >>
> >> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in messag
vailable, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a
>> floating static route, etc.
>>
>> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >Greetings,
>> >Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminat
l BGP from both, full BGP from one with a
> floating static route, etc.
>
> "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Greetings,
> > Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate
I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's
>on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link.
>
>
>
>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misco
Greetings,
Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's
on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduc
n message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Doug Guth wrote:> > > Can BGP really "load
balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them> > (one is
768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have&
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Doug Guth wrote:
> Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
> (one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
> to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance acro
only load balancing don`t require BGP
> Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
> (one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
> to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
multihomig
redundant
load balancing
optimized routes
only
if you`re thinking about only load balancing
inside(lan) to outside(internet) traffic.
> Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
> (one is 768k the other is full T1. It'
>Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
>(one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
>to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
>the links. I know I can set the
Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
(one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
the links. I know I can set the route maps and wor
31 matches
Mail list logo
