At 2:25 AM + 7/14/03, Jason Viera wrote:
>What bothers me is that Cisco's implementation of a protocol doesn't always
>match the RFC.
Part of the problem is the RFC sometimes doesn't match ANYONE's
implementation. That's not to say that there weren't interoperable
implementations at the tim
What bothers me is that Cisco's implementation of a protocol doesn't always
match the RFC. At least from my limited experience in reading the RFC's;
OSPF for example should not be able to summarize the backbone area, but in
Cisco's implementation of OSPF you can summarize area 0. I hear Cisco might
At 3:44 PM + 7/13/03, Hemingway wrote:
>""Jason Viera"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The individuals writing the book probably aren't privy to any exam
content
>> changes that are around the corner unless they are a part of the CCIE
>team,
>> another misconception is that Cis
""Jason Viera"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The individuals writing the book probably aren't privy to any exam content
> changes that are around the corner unless they are a part of the CCIE
team,
> another misconception is that Cisco Press is in close contact with
> technology chan
The individuals writing the book probably aren't privy to any exam content
changes that are around the corner unless they are a part of the CCIE team,
another misconception is that Cisco Press is in close contact with
technology changes that Cisco Systems is actually working on. What many
people d
I dont think that the book is all that bad , probably I am an
amateur in Security .
The thing I still can not understand is why is it that that when a
CCIE Practical Studies book is published by Cisco Press , some of there
topics become obsolete in a couple of months or the syllabus change
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just looking to get others opinions on this book. I'm just now to the OSPF
> chapter, and I have already found several pages worth of mistakes.
>
> I have an e-mail into ciscopress with a listing of the errors, and I
> understand that an
Just looking to get others opinions on this book. I'm just now to the OSPF
chapter, and I have already found several pages worth of mistakes.
I have an e-mail into ciscopress with a listing of the errors, and I
understand that any first edition will have some, but I'm finding critical
mistakes as
8 matches
Mail list logo
