-CX.
Brian
From: "Erik Mintz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Erik Mintz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Brian
Lodwick"
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EAS
:RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Hi,
I just glance at some of the discussion. Here is my two bob's worth. It is fine to
sit there and say how long it takes a signal to get from one end of a cable to
another. In the purest thoery both ends happen simultaneously (we all know this is
not true
2, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
B for
Brian
My additional question on top of this one is:
If the maximum legal length
ry details! ;-)
Priscilla
Brian
attenuation is effected by 3 elements spreading, scattering, and
absorption.
From: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 2
(Passed Switching last week :))
From: "Brian Lodwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Brian Lodwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:33:43 -
Group,
I will go ahead and post the answer to this question. I
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:33:43 -
Group,
I will go ahead and post the answer to this question. I believe your
answer Priscilla is absolutely correct.
My resources are Interconnections book (for a general understanding), but
* IEEE article can be found at: http://computer.org/Internet/v1n5/ether.htm
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Brian Lodwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:15:31 -0800
At 0
]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
B for
Brian
My additional question on top of this one is:
If the maximum legal length was set to 1/10th the size to make regular
(10Mb/sec) increased by a factor of 10, what was done to further
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Brian Lodwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:56:25 -0800
At 02:33 PM 1/23/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
I thin
Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
B for
Brian
My additional question on top of this one is:
If the maximum legal
nuary 22, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
B for
Brian
My additional question on top of this one is:
If the maximum legal length was set to 1/
.
Priscilla
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Erik Mintz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Brian Lodwick"
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:27:31 -0500
I h
Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Brian Lodwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 09:20 PM 1/22/01, Brian Lodwick wrote:
B for
Brian
My additional question on top of this one is:
If the maximum
Full-duplex Fast Ethernet isn't CSMA/CD either. There are only two stations
that can send and they each have their own private transmit pair and
receive pair. So it's not really multiple access (MA). There's no need to
sense the carrier to see if someone else is sending. There isn't anyone
else.
The network span of a 100Base-T Network (205) meters is approx. 10 times
smaller than the network span of a 10Base-T network (2500) meters Because
A) , Higher speed data signals attenuate more quickly and so cannot be
transmitted that far
B) . Both Networks have minimum frame sizes of
edium is not changed, a station transmitting 10 times faster
must have a max. distance 10 times less.
Hope this helps...
Rick Watson
-Original Message-
From: Alvarado Jesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST O
, 2001 8:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
The network span of a 100Base-T Network (205) meters is approx. 10 times
smaller than the network span of a 10Base-T network (2500) meters Because
A) , Higher speed data signals attenuate more quickly and so cannot
long of a cable you can run down and back!
That sounded like Nonsense, didn't it?
--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Metz)
To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 22, 2001 7:43:48 PM GMT
Subject: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
It's B.
I think
B for
Brian
From: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:10:43 -0500
The network span of a 100Base-T Network (2
?
Brian
attenuation is effected by 3 elements spreading, scattering, and absorption.
From: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:10:43 -0500
T
: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:37:45 -0500 (EST)
I didn't care much for either of those choices.
The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times
or
you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is
constant and 10-baseT bits last 10
mothy Metz)
To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 22, 2001 7:43:48 PM GMT
Subject: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
It's B.
I think we just had this discussion not too long ago, it was quite a long
thread with a lot of discussion on slot time (or the Cisco equiv term).
Tim
---
for the input, though!
--Original Message--
From: "Brian Lodwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 22, 2001 10:30:31 PM GMT
Subject: Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Well answer B is correct. The diameter of the network is in fac
fected by 3 elements spreading, scattering, and absorption.
From: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Alvarado Jesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:10:43 -0500
The network span of a 100Base-T
At 03:37 PM 1/22/01, Jack Williams wrote:
The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times or
you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is
constant and 10-baseT bits last 10 times longer than 100-baseT bits, that
directly influences how long of
Priscilla,
Well put. Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jack Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
At 03:37 PM 1/22/01, Jack Williams
27 matches
Mail list logo
