neil K wrote:
>
> The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why
> half-duplex. The
> Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to
> the Wireless
> Bridge.
> I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said the
> collisions
> are more than 0.53 much higher than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Don't you divide the number of collisions by the number of
> output packets to
> get the rate?
Yes and then multiply by 100 to get a percent. Cisco's threshold is a
percent.
But I agree with the gist of your message. It's not a big deal if the result
is 1.3%, even th
The problem is that we are doing VoIP over the link using Cisco FXO and FXS
ports and People are complaining about Voice breaking up, like a bad cell
phone call. I heard it myself, it sounds good but sometimes breaks up.The
routers are running g.729 and use the Wireless link. I have looked into the
I'm concerned about the output errors. Collisions are not considered output
errors; they're to be expected with half duplex ethernet. So, you do really
have a problem of some variety that needs to be investigated.
I'm not familiar with the bridge you're referring to. Are you positive that
it is
that router?
John
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Ethernet Interface Collisions Incresing rapidl [7:71176]
> John Neiberger wrote:
> >
> > I'm concerned about the output errors. Colli
Still, that's something to check into, as well.
>
> What IOS image is on that router?
>
> John
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Ethernet Interface Collis
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> I'm concerned about the output errors. Collisions are not
> considered output
> errors; they're to be expected with half duplex ethernet. So,
> you do really
> have a problem of some variety that needs to be investigated.
Thanks for that info, John. I wasn't sure if ou
7 matches
Mail list logo
