NetworkWorld Road to CCIE - WAS RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Lance Hubbard
>From: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Brian Lodwick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam >Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:59:

RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Sam Adams
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam Chuck, You need a beer, a vacation, some excercise, some kind of stress reliever. I do feel your cry from the trenches. I think part of the problem is, this field gets bigger every day. The IT industry promises so much, even for the really

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Clayton Price
I think most people would consider someone asking a question about how something works, or why you do such and such, a valid question. Asking someone to tell you what to study and what not to study is not a valid question as far as I'm concerned. Clayton Price "jennifer cribbs" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread jennifer cribbs
I can only speak for myself, and as someone just starting out from the standpoint of alot of you guys, that response will make me think before asking what i would consider a valid question. And is validity assessed by what you all connsider valid, or what I consider valid based on the knowledg

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Brian Lodwick
CTED]> >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Hubert Pun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Cisco Study Group" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam >Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:43:16 -0800 > > &

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Ronald James
Chuck, although I tend to agree of what you said on your message, I don't think you are in the position of criticizing anyone with any kind of questions. I do think some of these people sometimes do nothing but just want to get benefits out of the list, but look! they won't get through the CCIE p

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-18 Thread Robert Borejszo
Way to go Adrian Wow, I wish I could put post like yours together. Robert "Adrian Chew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8v52mu$fcb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8v52mu$fcb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Gee... must have been a really bad day huh? Can't say I disagree with > what's been said though

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-17 Thread Adrian Chew
Gee... must have been a really bad day huh? Can't say I disagree with what's been said though - there's a pretty big pipeline of people waiting for lab exam openings and from rumors heard of people getting throw out halfway through day one - there's more than enough attempts made without any hop

Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-17 Thread Patrick Bass
WELL SAID ""Chuck Larrieu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 004201c050d7$031878a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:004201c050d7$031878a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > WARNING: The following is a bit heated. > > YOU MAY WANT TO SKIP THIS ONE > > R > > A > > N > > T > > A > > N > > D > > R > > A > > V > > E

HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam

2000-11-17 Thread Chuck Larrieu
WARNING: The following is a bit heated. YOU MAY WANT TO SKIP THIS ONE R A N T A N D R A V E OK. Steam coming out of ears. I've been trying to avoid comment on a number of these kinds of questions, but this does it. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THE F*ING WORK, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YO