I have seen times where if you connect the two routers through a switch,
that spanning-tree can disrupt the HSPR Hellos, and cause problems. If you
are connecting these two routers through a switch (or a swicthed
environment), make sure to use spanning-tree portfast on those ports so that
hi
this is a strange thing.
If the routers are connected via a switch make sure that port security is
disabled because the actice router has 2 MAC Adresses for the HSRP interface.
see you
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62136t=62064
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two routers.
x.x.x.x.36 config:
standby 1 ip x.x.x.35
standby 1 priority 150
standby 1 preempt delay minimum 2
standby 1 track serial0 10
x.x.x.x.37 config:
standby 1 ip x.x.x.35
standby 1 priority 140
standby 1 prempt
standby 1 track serial0 20
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two routers.
f0 interface config:
x.x.x.x.36 config:
standby 1 ip x.x.x.35
standby 1 priority 150
standby 1 preempt delay minimum 2
standby 1 track serial0 15
f0 interface config:
x.x.x.x.37 config:
standby 1 ip x.x.x.35
standby 1 priority 140
standby 1
what are the routers connected too that allows the routers
to talk hsrp to each other...?
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: Raj
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two routers.
f0 interface config:
x.x.x.x.36 config:
standby 1 ip x.x.x.35
standby 1 priority 150
standby 1 preempt delay minimum 2
standby 1 track serial0 15
f0 interface
the routers send hellp packets using a multicast address - check that this
is not being blocked somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 January 2003 22:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP PROBLEM [7:62057]
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two
One day, I discovered that one of the router continuously display an error
message from the console showing that there is a bad authentication between
HSRP members.
*Oct 27 07:15:19: %STANDBY-3-BADAUTH: Bad authentication from x.x.x.x,
remote state Init
Right now, there are only two routers
first, ensure both router's ethernet port are connected with the same lan
open debug ip hsrp on each router to debug the status of the ACTIVE ,
STANDBY.
Kevin Pan One day, I discovered that one of the router continuously
display an error
message from the console showing that there is a bad
I just added a VLAN to my Cat6509s. The interfaces for the vlan are
configured on both MSFCs in both of my 6509s. We are using HSRP. both
interfaces show up/up the VLAN shows active in the VTP server(a) and
client(b) 6509. I set the standby priority on the vlan int config on the
MSFC to 100 on
, L.L.C.
http://www.thedeal.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP? problem [7:811]
I just added a VLAN to my Cat6509s
om: Jason Fletcher
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/16/01 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: NAT HSRP Problem
I don't think you can do this? The standby router doesn't have the
translation table of the active router, so when the active router went
down
you will lose your connection.
Jason Fletcher
&q
htmlDIVHi Guys/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVI've got 2 dual ethernet Cisco 1605 routers connected to each other via 2
cascaded hubs.Both sets of interfaces are set up for HSRP.(eth0 of both routers
arenbsp;in one HSRP group amp; eth1 are in another HSRP group). Both routers have
also been set up to
I don't think you can do this? The standby router doesn't have the
translation table of the active router, so when the active router went down
you will lose your connection.
Jason Fletcher
"Simon Watson" wrote in message ...
htmlDIVHi Guys/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVI've got 2 dual ethernet Cisco
the
virtual MAC address but uses the actual physical address
I've heard that they are working on a enhancement that should address both
issues. Hopefully it will be out in 12.2x.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Jason Fletcher
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/16/01 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: NAT HSRP
I never rely on auto negotiation period. I always set it to half or full,
depending on what I want.
Brian W.
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Brian wrote:
personally it sounds like duplex problems possibly. I have seen major
duplex auto-negotiating problems in 36x0 IOS code. So i would
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Brian W. wrote:
I never rely on auto negotiation period. I always set it to half or full,
depending on what I want.
Brian W.
thats good..I would make sure its set on the switch as
well..
---
Brian
I have two 3662 routers with four fast ethernet interfaces on each. Each of the 3662s are running HSRP on three of their interfaces. The three interfaces are connected to three Cat 3512 switches, such that one interface from each router connects to each switch.
Here's my problem. For some
What about the switches? Have you checked to see if Spanning Tree is
shutting down interfaces?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP Problem
I have two 3662 routers with four fast
check on spanning tree issues..
hth,
Mark.
At 08:09 PM 10/13/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two 3662 routers with four fast ethernet interfaces on each. Each
of the 3662s are running HSRP on three of their interfaces. The three
interfaces are connected to three Cat 3512
personally it sounds like duplex problems possibly. I have seen major
duplex auto-negotiating problems in 36x0 IOS code. So i would force
speed/duplex on the fe ports and the switch ports and see how that
goes..
brian
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two 3662 routers
yes ive seen this too.. but it was with GE..
At 09:19 PM 10/13/00 -0500, Brian wrote:
personally it sounds like duplex problems possibly. I have seen major
duplex auto-negotiating problems in 36x0 IOS code. So i would force
speed/duplex on the fe ports and the switch ports and see how that
Dear Group,
I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP on a couple of 3640s. I
have set this up using configurations that have been working previously.
Both routers are connected to Nortel 10/100 autosensing switches (separate
but in the same stack). I have no VLANs or segmentation set
Hello Paul,
First you should alway set your switch in static mode as 10 or 100 baseT
if your sure the port attach is 10 or 100 BaseT, remove the autosense
mode for those port
Yves Routhier
Paul Montgomery wrote:
Dear Group,
I am experiencing difficulty with implementing HSRP on a couple
.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 02:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HSRP problem
Do your switches support multicast?
From: Paul Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Paul Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 03:43
To: Paul Montgomery
Subject: Re: HSRP problem
Paul,
I think you need a number after standby to associate a
group so both router know there in the same group
e0
standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 priority 100
e0
]'
Subject: RE: HSRP problem
Bill,
Thanks for your response. I actually had a group number in an earlier
config. I took it out after looking at a sample config on the cisco
web site
(http://cisco.com/warp/public/619/1.html)
Either way it didn't work.
Regards,
Paul
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: HSRP problem
Bill,
Thanks for your response. I actually had a group
number in an earlier
config. I took it out after looking at a sample
config on the cisco
web site
(http://cisco.com/warp/public/619/1.html)
Either way it didn't work
28 matches
Mail list logo
