does anyone have any links to documentation comparing
the two? or opinions / personal experience to draw
from?
i really dig the idea of yanking an nt dhcp server out
and replacing it with a 2600/3500 ios router running
dhcp
me ccnp/voice mcse ccdp cnx bla bla
__
At 01:52 PM 3/15/01, Eric Waguespack wrote:
>does anyone have any links to documentation comparing
>the two? or opinions / personal experience to draw
>from?
>
>i really dig the idea of yanking an nt dhcp server out
>and replacing it with a 2600/3500 ios router running
>dhcp
That seems risky to m
nd though in case it takes a dive.
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eric Waguespack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ElephantChild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: IOS D
d 2500 for it though. Just make sure
>you have a spare one around though in case it takes a dive.
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Eric Waguespack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Elepha
Am I missing something here? I mean an average DHCP process with the ACKs
and all that jazz is not that much, probably less than 5k I would imagine.
And there would be very little processing required to finish the request. I
think it would take a LOT of requests to even bog down a Pentium 100 a
li
It's been awhile, but I was under the impression that even if a user had a
lease that wasn't expired and booted a machine that tried to contact a DHCP
server and failed the TCP/IP stack wouldn't wouldn't initialize. As already
noted people who are already logged on with unexpired leases would be f
: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IOS DHCP vs NT DHCP
It's been awhile, but I was under the impression that even if a user had a
lease that wasn't expired and booted a machine that tried to contact a DHCP
server and failed the TCP/IP stack wouldn't woul
Well, obviously I went a little overboard with my example of a Pentium 4
for a DHCP server! &;-) But I'm still a bit queasy about running DHCP on a
slow server. Selecting a DHCP server requires an analysis of how many
clients ask for services at once, obviously, and how much processing power
t
ess to get
reconfigured with parameters that are valid for the new location.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Russ Kreigh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IOS DHCP vs NT DHCP
Well, obviously I went a littl
1. DHCP service has a VERY low processor utilization. All it does is sits
idle until it has to reply to requests for IP addresses and then issues
leases. The shorter the lease time, the busier the service becomes. However,
it IS a very vital service, needs to be reliable, and is very difficult
Not trying to nit pick but the response packet ( the fourth packet in a new
DHCP lease negotiation) is an SMB response packet type of "ACK" (DHCP can
only respond with an ACK or a NACK) thus it most definitely uses "ACKS and
all that"
-Original Message-
3. DHCP is carried by UDP protocol
You are right. The packets are:
Discover
Offer
Response
ACK
The way to remember it is DORA.
It's not SMB, though. Not sure why you threw that in.
Priscilla
At 04:18 PM 3/16/01, you wrote:
>Not trying to nit pick but the response packet ( the fourth packet in a new
>DHCP lease negotiation) is
16, 2001 17:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IOS DHCP vs NT DHCP
You are right. The packets are:
Discover
Offer
Response
ACK
The way to remember it is DORA.
It's not SMB, though. Not sure why you threw that in.
Priscilla
At 04:18 PM 3/16/01, you wrote:
>Not trying to nit pick
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Groupstudy
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IOS DHCP vs NT DHCP
I beg to differ a little here. If you have ever monitored the DHCP servers
utilization, you will have noted it barely creeps over a percent
u ... I stand corrected thanks to Scott (but it sure don't show up as an
ACK in my TCP/IP packet traces...)
-e-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not trying to nit pick but the response packet ( the fourth packet in a new
> DHCP lease negotiation) is an SMB response packet type of "ACK" (DHCP can
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
