RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Jim Brown
rtins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IPX ID [7:53989] If you enter an IPX commands before you define the node address manually, it will use the highest mac address on Ethernet interface regardless of the node address manually entered. To reset the router, you must remove all IPX commands, remo

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Jim Brown
very first command after the reload should be the ipx routing 2.2.2 command, then all will be well. -Original Message- From: Mike Martins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IPX ID [7:53989] I got the IPX network going

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Martins
I got the IPX network going between all routers, over frame relay etc etc no problem. On the frame-relay map statements (opposite sides) I mapped to the IPX/MAC address that the router had elected. Everything works, no worries. I am not doing anything different, all routers were running default IP

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Mike Martins wrote: > > The version of IOS I am using is about the same as the lab (how > reassuring). I used my old frame relay switch still running and > spluttering 11.3 enterprise and it likes it when I type IPX > routing a.a.a - do a show run and there she is: ipx routing > 000a.000a.000a -

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Martins
The version of IOS I am using is about the same as the lab (how reassuring). I used my old frame relay switch still running and spluttering 11.3 enterprise and it likes it when I type IPX routing a.a.a - do a show run and there she is: ipx routing 000a.000a.000a - like an old faithfull... The que

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Mike Martins wrote: > > Priscilla > Thanks for that. Years in IP and I am clueless about IPX. > Reason why I was using my own x.x.x was for a easy number to > remember for the frame relay map statements on opposite ends. Oh, that makes sense. > (I looked at practise labs - that is what they wuz

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Martins
Priscilla Thanks for that. Years in IP and I am clueless about IPX. Reason why I was using my own x.x.x was for a easy number to remember for the frame relay map statements on opposite ends. (I looked at practise labs - that is what they wuz using) I am still befuddled why on one router it takes t

RE: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Mike Martins wrote: > > Hi > > Simple question, enabling IPX on a router: ipx routing x.x.x > I want to use say 2.2.2 as the router ID. That's not really a router ID that you're assigning. It's a node address to use on a serial link. Are you running IPX on one of your serial links? An IPX add

Re: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Martins
Robert I understand all that - when I type in 'ipx routing ie 5.5.5' on another router (with no other configs) and sh run gives me ipx routing 0005.0005.0005 which is what I want. I am asking why does it do this and is there a way around this? I dont like IPX, but the lab beckons me... Message

Re: IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Robert Edmonds
According to the following Cisco link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/33.html#networknumber As with other network addresses, Novell IPX network addresses must be unique. These addresses are represented in hexadecimal format and consist of two parts: a network number and a node number. The

IPX ID [7:53989]

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Martins
Hi Simple question, enabling IPX on a router: ipx routing x.x.x I want to use say 2.2.2 as the router ID. Problem is after I type this address and show run the router has taken one of the interface's Mac addresses as the router IPX ID. Is there something I am missing here? (I am using ver 12.1(5)