RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-26 Thread Cohen, Michael
owever are extremely important when using additional devices like PC's in the routing domain. -Mike Cohen -Original Message- From: Marlon Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Micros

[Fwd: RE: Microsoft 'Routers']

2000-06-25 Thread David
forwarded from out small thread. david Original Message Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:52:47 -0700 From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "Marlon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-25 Thread Tretter, Paul
Reply To: William E Gragido > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 6:29 PM > To: Billy Monroe; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' > > Excuse me, but Microsoft, Novell and various Unix platforms have been > allowing for the routing of RIP and O

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-16 Thread Marlon Brown
a PC would be much more expensive than a Cisco 25xx... Thanks, >From: "William E Gragido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers

FW: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-16 Thread Jim Healis
Jim Healis, CCNP, CCDP Senior Network Engineer wine.com cell: (510) 418-6210 office: (510) 818-7352 -Original Message- From: Jim Healis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:24 AM To: Billy Monroe Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' I could see this

[Fwd: RE: Microsoft 'Routers']

2000-06-16 Thread David
forwarded from a small thread. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:26 PM To: Chuck Larrieu Cc: Marlon Brown Subject:Re: Microsoft 'Routers' I would bet that it doesn't as well, but

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-16 Thread William E Gragido
oe > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Microsoft 'Routers' > > > I see that Microsoft has provided resources to configure OSPF and RIP in > Windows 2000 servers > to provide routing capabilities. > > Has anybody evaluat

Re: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>I see that Microsoft has provided resources to configure OSPF and RIP in >Windows 2000 servers >to provide routing capabilities. It's a Microsoft port of Bay RS code, but not 100% compatible with Bay. > >Has anybody evaluate this ? Do you think this could substitute 'real' >routers ? > >Thanks,

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-14 Thread Cohen, Michael
June 13, 2000 6:19 PM To: 'Marlon Brown'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' I seriously don't think MS will hurt Cisco's routing business. Are you telling me that ISP, Corp will start using MS as a router? M

Re: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread David
> Yes, UNIX systems have had routing capabilities for a very long > time, but saying "since the beginning of the Internet" is probably a > bit of an exageration. In the beginning, there were things called, > IMP's, which were basically custom code running on IBM RT-PC's, that > handled rout

Re: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread Richard Holland
t; To: "Albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Marlon Brown'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 10:57 PM Subject: Re: Microsoft 'Routers' > Don't count on W

Re: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread John Wu
l has assumed ownership, I don't see any hope in it. - Original Message - From: "Albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Marlon Brown'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread Albert
n Brown Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' I disagree with you regarding the support issue. They could call the MCSE 2000 people :-) I just want to see where they want to

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread William E Gragido
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers' > > > What do you exactly mean by 'functional' ? Have you seen it working in > a live network ? > Unix for example, has provided more routing resources and it doesn't > seem to be a viable substitute for

RE: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread Marlon Brown
MS Routing and Remote Access team is making huge investiments on these Routing features. >From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Billy Monroe" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread David
FYI, unix has also had routing capabilities inherent in the operating system, as well as software for BGP, OSPF, RIP and friends in free software like routed/gated since the beginning of the Internet. But, would I ever use any unix box for a router? Not unless it was five years ago, it was linu

Microsoft 'Routers'

2000-06-13 Thread Billy Monroe
I see that Microsoft has provided resources to configure OSPF and RIP in Windows 2000 servers to provide routing capabilities. Has anybody evaluate this ? Do you think this could substitute 'real' routers ? Thanks, ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.grou