there are 2/3 questions on redistribution and 1
question on route map ( ie policy routing )
--- Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there many questions on route distribution or
> route maps in the BCSN?
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I would say "D". Cisco has really looked at using VLANs for security and
management. But with Cisco's mindset, "E" is also possible. VLANS do help
segment broadcast domains.
""Donald B Johnson Jr"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02c001c0178c$16
A
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BCSN
Importance: Low
What would be the right answer to this question.
I got this off the cisco site and I answered c but they marked it rong
My mistake, sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 6:37 PM
To: Patrick Bass; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCSN
Importance: Low
Na vlans have nothing to do with the transport layer.
Does it?
Duck
- Original
Na vlans have nothing to do with the transport layer.
Does it?
Duck
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: BCSN
> A
>
> -Original Message-
if it is a single choice,it is D,otherwise it is D,E
"Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What would be the right answer to this question.
> I got this off the cisco site and I answered
I don't see why D is preferable than E
cslx wrote:
> if it is a single choice,it is D,otherwise it is D,E
> "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02c001c0178c$1643b450$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > What would be the right answer to
Looks like a detailed breakdown of this one is in order:
VLANs have been designed to _.
A. address forwarding decisions based on transport layer information and
spanning tree scalability
(VLANs have nothing to do with Layer 4, so we can cross this one out.)
B. maximize the amount of tr
Title: RE: BCSN
I would go are B theoritically.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCSN
My mistake, sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Donald
VLAN's are for enhanced security. Nomention of it in E.
D would be correct
Regards,
Jason Baker
-Original Message-
From: luobin Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cslx
Subject: Re: BCSN
I don't se
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jason Baker wrote:
> VLAN's are for enhanced security. Nomention of it in E.
> D would be correct
I would vote for E, if a single choice. All of them have some part of
the answer that appears somewhat bogus. D mentions redundant access,
which VLANs aren't really designed f
I agree with Bradley that there is no clear correct answer for this
question, but given that we're looking for the best answer, I would choose
E.
A:nothing to do with transport layer
B:too ambiguous (not necessary that inter-VLAN routing uses Layer 3
switching, could use an external route
I believe the answer is "e"
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2000 00:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BCSN
What would be the right answer to this question.
I got this off the cisco site and I answered c but they marked it rong.
000 11:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCSN
I agree with Bradley that there is no clear correct answer for this
question, but given that we're looking for the best answer, I would choose
E.
A:nothing to do with transport layer
B:too ambiguous (not necessary that inter-VLAN routi
yes i think it is E
>From: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Low How Ming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: BCSN
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:06:23 +0200
>
>Since when does a VLAN
Yeah but vlan's don't provide redundant access do they?
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'luobin Yang' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; cslx
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1
Title: RE: BCSN
Isn't traffic routed at layer three. Also you want to stay
away from layer three because it introduces more latency than layer
2
Duck
- Original Message -
From:
Raees Ahmed
Shaikh
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PRO
What page is that on.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: jh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: BCSN
> Answer e is also right out of the book(BCMSN). It is point that they harp
> o
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:06 AM
Subject: RE: BCSN
> Since when does a VLAN provide redundant access to a workgroup - answer
NO.
> VLANS are to create "secure" collision domains - no overlapping.. Again ,
I
> believe "E" is the way to go
>
> --
I agree
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:47 AM
To: Donald B Johnson Jr; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCSN
I believe the answer is "e"
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL
f any kind.
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 5:56 AM
To: Jason Baker; 'luobin Yang'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cslx
Subject: Re: BCSN
Yeah but vlan's don't provide redundant acces
Agreed
What is the chance of finalising this thread??... E is the answer - I can
almost stack something important on it.
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 September 2000 02:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jh
Subject: Re: BCSN
What page is
E on this like was stated. I can tell
you which page C is on word for word, if you want.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Donald B Johnson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; jh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Septem
Baker; 'luobin Yang'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cslx
> Subject: Re: BCSN
>
>
> Yeah but vlan's don't provide redundant access do they?
> Duck
> - Original Message -
> From: Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'luobin Yang' <[EMAIL
I am getting ready to take this test also.ACRC does not provide
enough info on BGP.Go to cisco's site and serach on bgp.I found
A 5 section case study that I think is real good.
Good luck
Tim
>From: Laszlo Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Laszlo Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTEC
If you look around, people who have taken the BSCN mention 30% consist of
BGP. I missed the ACRC by 3 questions, I guess I did not know it. However,
it only had 1 question at the time on BGP. I would look into purchasing a
new BSCN book.
I've recently learned from my publisher that the CISCO v
Did you find any good questions or studyguides on-line ?
""Lopez, Robert"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just passed the BCSN exam this morning... A thank you to this list for the
> exam thoughts that were shared and the encouraging conversatio
Luke,
Imagine being given a routing table and being
asked something indirect about it, such as what area
type is this router. Possible answers : ASBR, ABR,
Stubby, Not-so-stubby etc. This detail isn't given
explicitly but needs to be deduced from the routing
table you are given.
So in a n
Title: BCSN - OSPF
If it is mentioned in the objectives you better
know it very well. Consult CCO and be familiar with all of the OSPF-related
commands and case studies. Don't shortchange your acquisition of knowledge just
for the sake of passing an exam.
MLC
"Henson, Luke" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi
IPX and Apple Talk was dropped from BCSN, BCRAN and BCMSN
exam/courses. IPX will remain in ICND and in the CCNA and
CIT/CID exams...
So, for BCSN, don,t worry.
Regards!
---
Javier Contreras
CCSI
Olden Pieterse escribió:
> Hi there gang
>
> Im busy studying for the BCSN (from my ACRC manuel b
I must not be paying enough attentionare they changing the format of
the CCNP exams again?
>>> "Brian Zeitz" 3/1/02 9:47:28 AM >>>
Hello Friends,
I just scheduled the BCSN exam for Next Sunday. This is my second try
at
it. I really know a lot more then I did the first time around, and the
Yes. The will be the 600 series exams. Betas are on the street now. I
don't know how long it takes to get to "production" from beta though. I
think they usually have a pretty decent phase-in period.
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36998&t=36985
---
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> I must not be paying enough attentionare they changing the
> format of
> the CCNP exams again?
>
> >>> "Brian Zeitz" 3/1/02 9:47:28 AM
> >>>
> Hello Friends,
(forgot to hit that quote button again!)
Yes. They will be the 600 series exams. Betas are on the street
Whenever Cisco feels like it. They're not consistent with the time between
the beta exams and the release of the new exams. It also depends how happy
Cisco is with the results of the beta's. If they're not happy with them, who
knows when new exams will be released. For example, look at the CID 640
Yes, if Cisco is happy with the results of the CCNP beta's that just ended.
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCSN [7:36985]
I must not be paying enough attention..
Yes. The betas are offered until March 9th. ($50)
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCSN [7:36985]
I must not be paying enough attentionare they changing the format of
the
Really? It's about time. Now they just have to update their website.
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:47 PM
To: 'Kaminski, Shawn G'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCSN [7:36985]
The new CID exam was
ssage-
From: Andy Barkl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:47 PM
To: 'Kaminski, Shawn G'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCSN [7:36985]
The new CID exam was released about 3 weeks ago.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The passing score is 690. I used the ACRC material, Halabi's book: Internet
Routing Architectures, the BGP guide on CCO entitled: Using the Border
Gateway Protocol for Interdomain Routing, and the new Boson prep test for
BSCN. Boson also has a .pdf on their Cisco page outlining the differences
i
I am going to take that exam on the 26 th of august. This exam is much build
on routing protocols like OSPF, BGP and EIGRP. Here is that I have studied
so far:
1) The exam objectives on the cisco page
2) There is a good explanation of the difference between the old ACRC and
BSCN on www.boson.com i
Was there a TON of BGP as others have suggested? Any info would be
greatly appreciated!!!
Mike
--- "TALBOT, WILLIAM P (SWBT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The passing score is 690. I used the ACRC material, Halabi's book:
> Internet
> Routing Architectures, the BGP guide on CCO entitled: Using
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072124776/o/qid=962230732/sr=8-1/ref=aps_sr_b_1_1/002-4521789-0954405
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> >
> > Can anybody tell me what is the best way to study for this exam? I have
> exam
> > this week and got old ACRC book by Clare Cough. The
Good luck! I am taking mine at the end of this month.
Heather Buri - CCNA
CSC Technology Services
Phone: (713)-961-8592
Fax:(713)-961-8249
Mobile:
Alpha Page:
Mailing:1360 Post Oak Blvd
Suite 500
Houston, TX 77056
-Origin
I read McGraw Hills BCMSN & just passed by the hair of my chinny chin
chin... I think the Exam Cram is the best for this exam. My advice, if the
book makes the exam look easy... you need another book :o)
Good Luck !!!
Phil
PS Border had them for buy on, get 50% off the second book
- Origi
i passed with 934/1000 using the Lamle book and some lab time. so, i
disagree with the previous comment about 'if the book seems basic...' in
this case.
definitely hit trunking...what happens in auto, on, negotiate, etc.
multicast was not as tough as i had studied, but be able to
differentiate
Rob,
I sat this exam a couple of months ago and the Cisco press course book,
pretty much covered the whole thing. I did the labs aswell to get it right
in my head.
B.
""Feletar, Robert"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to this mailing list an
Thanks Boywonder, sounds like i'm on the right track.
Do you recall any 'type in the command' questions ?
Regards,
Rob.
-Original Message-
From: Boywonder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCSN exam [7:
47 matches
Mail list logo
