ter confirm if the notications in the logs were once
from each peer or repeated messages from numerous peers.
-Original Message-
From: John Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
The message format is
ogs were once
from each peer or repeated messages from numerous peers.
-Original Message-
From: John Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
The message format is FACILITY-SEVERITY-MNEMONIC. So this
; > Charles
> >
> >
> > ""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3
> > > subcode 7.
> > >
> >
loop would be code 3
> > subcode 7.
> >
> > hth,
> > Mark.
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338
family (or other optional
capability) mismatch.
Of course, I don't have a PhD, nor my CCIE # yet, so I may not actually be
worthy of the response I've typed.
Best Regards,
John
- Original Message -
From: "Charles"
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:43 PM
Subject:
Check the version? on each routerh for BGP. You can configure BGP Version
by using neighbor x.x.x.x /27 version X
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60375&t=60339
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
hth,
> Mark.
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
>
>
> hey,
>
> %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7
>
> B
Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3
subcode 7.
hth,
Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
hey,
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to
hey,
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7
BGP-3 means it's a BGP UPDATE message error
2/7 are the error subcodes (I believe!)
2- unrecognized well known attribute
7- AS Routing loop
take a closer look at your configs, etc... is it possible you've got a loop
on your hands?
hope this
CCO - TAC error decoder provided this feedback for the below error:
1. %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: [chars] neighbor [IP_address] [dec]/[dec] ([chars])
[dec] bytes [chars]
An error condition has been detected in the BGP session. A notification
packet is being sent or received, and the session will be rese
if you want to stop log entries simply do a no bgp log-neighbor-changes
:-)
however, back to the real issue... you wouldn't happen to be doing
ipv6overipv4 tunneling on these peers would you?
-Original Message-
From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:3
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BGP Problem [7:6376]
Check with Interpacket. They've probably assigned a higher local preference
to routes coming from you.
CM
> -Original Message-
> From: Osama Kamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 May 2001 07:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Check with Interpacket. They've probably assigned a higher local preference
to routes coming from you.
CM
> -Original Message-
> From: Osama Kamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 May 2001 07:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: BGP Problem [7:6376]
>
>
> We have a problem with
After looking at the correct page, p. 328, I see nothing in those configs or
your configs to set the metric, or MED, so it is defaulting to zero. My
guess is that the "show ip bgp" output that shows the metric set to 20 for
some of those routes is wrong.
Regardless, unless you have specifically
Oops, I meant page 328, Fig 11-6
rgds
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't advertise routes out of the same interface your recieve them from.
"azhar mumtaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost">news:20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost...
> A BGP speaker must never advertise an address of a peer to that peer as a
> NEXT_HO
How did you manage to solve it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Raymond Mak
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem
I have solved the problem now.
Regards,
Raymond Mak
Raymond Mak wrote
I have solved the problem now.
Regards,
Raymond Mak
Raymond Mak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have local and global connection to Internet.
> When I trace from local site to internal network, it passes through
> local connection, and when I trace from global site to internal network,
> it can pass through
18 matches
Mail list logo
