RE: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-06 Thread Amr Essam
ter confirm if the notications in the logs were once from each peer or repeated messages from numerous peers. -Original Message- From: John Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338] The message format is

RE: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-06 Thread Vicuna, Mark
ogs were once from each peer or repeated messages from numerous peers. -Original Message- From: John Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338] The message format is FACILITY-SEVERITY-MNEMONIC. So this

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Charles
; > Charles > > > > > > ""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3 > > > subcode 7. > > > > >

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Wesley
loop would be code 3 > > subcode 7. > > > > hth, > > Mark. > > -Original Message----- > > From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread John Murphy
family (or other optional capability) mismatch. Of course, I don't have a PhD, nor my CCIE # yet, so I may not actually be worthy of the response I've typed. Best Regards, John - Original Message - From: "Charles" To: Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:43 PM Subject:

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Charles
hth, > Mark. > -Original Message- > From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338] > > > hey, > > %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7 > > B

RE: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3 subcode 7. hth, Mark. -Original Message- From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338] hey, %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Charles
hey, %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7 BGP-3 means it's a BGP UPDATE message error 2/7 are the error subcodes (I believe!) 2- unrecognized well known attribute 7- AS Routing loop take a closer look at your configs, etc... is it possible you've got a loop on your hands? hope this

Re: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread chris kane
CCO - TAC error decoder provided this feedback for the below error: 1. %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: [chars] neighbor [IP_address] [dec]/[dec] ([chars]) [dec] bytes [chars] An error condition has been detected in the BGP session. A notification packet is being sent or received, and the session will be rese

RE: BGP problem [7:60338]

2003-01-05 Thread Vicuna, Mark
if you want to stop log entries simply do a no bgp log-neighbor-changes :-) however, back to the real issue... you wouldn't happen to be doing ipv6overipv4 tunneling on these peers would you? -Original Message- From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:3