There are a few GNU/Linux developments.
http://www.freshmeat.net/
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
""Chiao Liang"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
94qtjt
no, you need to buy it
""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all..
can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it
is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which
Brad Ellis wrote:
>
> no, you need to buy it
> ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all..
>
> can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it
> is shareversion .
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:43 PM
To: Brad Ellis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure !
Brad Ellis wrote:
>
> no, you need to buy it
> ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]"&
alidating.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:43 PM
> To: Brad Ellis
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco Secure !
>
>
> Brad Ellis wrote:
> >
> > no, you need to buy it
> > &qu
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 7:15 AM
> Subject: RE: Cisco Secure !
>
> > One does not need a database product to run CiscoSecure. Although, one
> does
> > have an option to use one
Will not work with 2000
Regards,
Manny Colon
Computer Services
Information Builders Inc.
ML wrote:
> Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it worked.
>
> THanks,
> ML
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groups
Any particular reason why? I am not sure what you mean, wont install, wont
run as in function? I know Cisco says they dont support it on 2000 but that
is different than wont work.
Thanks,
ML
Manny Colon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Will no
Hi
It won't install, comes back with something like "Requires NT 4 or Higher"
what a laugh!
--
John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I
""ML"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any particular reason why? I am not sure what you mean, wont
Win2000 will be supported in ver 2.3 which should be out shortly. It is in
beta now...
Tim
""John Hardman"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96i2jb$4j4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96i2jb$4j4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi
It won't install, comes back with something like "Requires NT 4 or Higher"
wha
Is CSPM better as compared to Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System =
(IDS)?We are considering these too using price & functionality =
points of view, which has superior basic functionality.With IDS, we =
have to have HP openview which we don't have now (additional cost). =
Any
Actually, the version I was trying was 1.1, which is the "latest and
greatest" for connecting to a PIX.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco
Nicole,
The supplied VPN client won't run on W2K, You'll have to apply for the beta
version which is working fine for me so far.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc:
The Cisco VPN client doesn't work with win2k; however, the company that
wrote the client software for Cisco also puts out a product call safe-net
(www.ire.com) that will work with win2k. It is almost identical to the Cisco
client. I believe that it costs 75$ per seat. Cisco isn't coming out with a
If your talking about the client that goes with the VPN 3000 then the Cisco software
will not work with win2k as Rick pointed out. I just implemented this for a client
using win2k and the solution is to use PPTP that is built into win2k instead of IPSEC.
I created a white paper on this and it w
The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that
does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and
forget who it is. If you want to run an IPSEC tunnel from a win2000 machine
to a Cisco device you have to do it through an l2tp tunnel. Set that up
firs
D]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Nicole,
The supplied VPN client won't run on W2K, You'll have to apply for the beta
version which is working fine for me so far.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
]]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:57 AM
To: 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that
does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and
forget who i
://www.oledrews.com/job
-Original Message-
From: Soucy, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:05 AM
To: 'Christopher Larson'; 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
C
12, 2001 5:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Ok, so I have searched CCO, but can't find info on the beta
anywhereanyone have any idea how I can get my hands on this?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From:
-
From: Christopher Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ??? 12 ? 2001 15:57
To: 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that
does make a client for Win 2000 and Cis
It's not free any more.
"...to hell with what other people think, I'm ridin' my own broom!" L. M.
Cynthia Bridgett, raised in SE DC
and proud of it!
CCNA, MCSE, CNE, CNA, MCP, A+
I'd guess at just having to delete the "=".
I believe that normally specifies 'spare', so you wouldn't need another copy
of the software.
Please let me know if this turns out to be incorrect.
Regards,
Gareth
""Ken Yeo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8qqu55$apm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qq
Good point, I always wonder what does the = sign means. I will let the group
knows when I find out the result.
Thanks!
Ken
""Gareth Hinton"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8qra2a$oeu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qra2a$oeu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'd guess at just having to delete the "=".
>
Ken,
I'm not sure about a part number, but it is downloadable from CCO -
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/vpnclient-crypto
watch the wrap.
Chuck Church
CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
Sr. Network Engineer
Magnacom Technologies
140 N. Rt. 303
Valley Cottage, NY 10989
845-267-4000 x218
>A
Title: RE: Cisco Secure VPN client
Here ya go...
VPN-SW-DES-100=
D
-Original Message-
From: Ken Yeo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Secure VPN client
Anyone knows the product number for the software
Hi All !
Could anybody pointout thegood site for SNMP.
"J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/10/2000 09:32:17 PM
Please respond to "J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam)
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure VPN B
A very good information on CSV log on cisco site you need to have CCO access
to view this page
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/csnt23/csnt23ug/logging.htm
Regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15281&t=15231
---
243 Problems / 180 minutes
Keep the MCNS 2.0 track,
lots fill-blank,
lots drap-drop,
not easy.
On 10 Sep 2000 09:36:15 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("chung") wrote:
>Hello!!
>
>I will take the Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam tomorrow!! Could anyone give
>me some advice? Which topic should I focus?
I took this exam on the 1st, Sept and all I've got to say is know "Security"
The test covered everything from PIX, Cisco Secure, IOS Firewall Feature
Set, IPSEC, IKE, CA, VPN client, and cisco tools for implementation. The
test was the normal 3 hours and loaded with 243 questions, I must admit at
There is no default username and password.
What you need to do is be on the server you installed it on and point
your web browser to 127.0.0.1:2002 this will put you right into the
administrators screen from there you add the usernames and passwords. To
add an administrator so you can administer t
I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work,
the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030
concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius with
Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version 3.0. We
upgraded to 3
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
> I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work,
> the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030
> concentrators this did not work and we were told by T
the concentrator you MUST make sure you are set to
use Radius with Expiry.
-Original Message-
From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
hi,
i upgraded my acs
ejaiye" ;
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:26 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
Exactly what capacity are you using the Radius box in? I use my radius
box with a Cisco 3030 concentrator all users logging in via vpn are
authenticated against the concentrator. There is nothing special y
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
The radius server is used to authenticate windows dial-up users using
broadband. I want the radius acct password to expire so that the user
can change it
I know you can have a maximum of 16 groups and a maximum of 16 servers in
each group bring the total of allowable servers to 256.
Regards.
Oletu
- Original Message -
From: Joel Satterley
To:
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:50 AM
Subject: Cisco Secure ACS Server [7:33415]
> Anyone kno
Not 100% sure if this is a full authentiaction error, but am alarmed by the
protocol=cdp section. I would guess that your dial list doesn't allow CDP ??/
Just a thought
#
Ants wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we have an ISDN dial in site setup and getting following error
> every couple
> of minutes..
> this sit
added 'no cdp enable' to my dialer ineterface and all seems to be working ok
now.
many thanks
""Troy Leliard"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not 100% sure if this is a full authentiaction error, but am alarmed by
the
> protocol=cdp section. I would guess that your dial list doesn't
Hi
It should be 1.0/1.1
fahim
""Shoaib Waqar"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi guys,
>
> Can anybody tell me that which version of Cisco Secure
> VPN client (version 1.0/1.1 OR 3.0/3.51) comes in MCNS
> exam. I have read the MCNS Cisco press book but i
> could
Assorted comments in line.
--On 12 August 2003 13:45 + "Reimer, Fred"
wrote:
>
> You should have six weeks to go through it. I'd
> suggest taking a day off or spending a Saturday to go through the whole
> course, but that's just me. I can't do the one hour here and there thing.
Hmmm, you
I'm for the check CCO part of your post.
Visit
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le30/le13/learning_learning_path.html
and you'll see all the Specialist certifications. They are not going
anywhere - yet.
The CCSP is still going strong:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le2/le37/le54
Just received e-mail from Cisco that they would send me the INFOSEC letter
of recognition after I signed the Cisco Certification Agreement.
I am spending time on other interesting stuffs which is not Cisco and not
sure if I would sit for recert.
""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PRO
Hi
You can not, you will have to rename one of the 16 existant groups
For creating groups, you will need ACS for unix
Regards
> Bulent Sahin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> How can i create a new group on Cisco Secure ACS?
>
> Thanks,
>
--
---
Javier Contreras Albesa
Standard Trainer
PRO IN Training
What about the MCNS exam ? Did you take it ?
What was the documentation you made usage for preparing to the Cisco Secure
PIX Firewall Advanced exam ?
Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com
-Original
Did you take the exam expecting to fail?
It seems funny that Cisco did not include some of the more elusive PIX
configuration problems.
I agree that there is a problem with examinations that allow you to suceed
without direct experience. But it is important to realise that these exams
only certi
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7).
But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service
on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't
check it, though).
Arthur Davis
CCIE #6430
Message Posted at:
http://www
im running version 2.4 and so far smooth as hell. nice and easy
configuration
excelent product.although the newer version out there havent tried them out
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things.
The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well.
""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access
uot;Chris Clark"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
>Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400
>
>Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things.
>The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very we
, 2001 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
So far the password changing issue is really the only limitation of ACS that
we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database that your
desktops login to (ADS for example) then
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
>
>
> So far the password changing issue is really the only
> limitation of ACS that
> we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same
I would say that there is a fair amount of subject matter overlap, but that
the CSPFA questions are significantly harder. The MCNS didn't have any type
in questions and those are abundant on CSPFA. The MCNS questions I remember
on the Pix and IOS Firewall were really pretty easy and more concept
Actually, Cisco has released a Win2K client. We downloaded it last week
(sorry, I don't have the URL). We specifically wanted to use it to connect
to our PIX. Then we found out that it requires PIX IOS v6 which is not
"scheduled" for release until late this week.
Jay Dunn
IPI GrammTech, Ltd.
210.
On the Cisco VPN Client download page itself, it states that v3 requires
PIXv6:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/vpnclient-3des (linked from
http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/ which requires CCO login):
"Compatibility Information
VPN 3000 Concentrator
v3.0 - VPN Client v3.0
PIX F
Terry,
I found some info on the following website:
http://www.tuanistechnology.com/Orinoco/orinoco_ap1000.htm
"Industry-Wide Interoperability and Compliance
The ORiNOCO AP-1000 is interoperable with other manufacturers' high-speed
IEEE 802.11b compliant systems. It's also compatible with Lucent
ACS will show messages like that when it backs up the database. It pauses,
or interupts services to perform the backup. Normally the services should
pick right back up very quickly, but if it doesn't for some reason, you will
have to manually restart services.
The same thing happened once with th
Hi!
pro: - in a full cisco environment it's the best choice, shunning works very
well!
con: - price
- signature updates only bimonthly
- managing with CSPM is simple, but it's nothing compared to
solutions
like ISS Realsecure Workgroup Manager
--
cU,
Laszlo Csosza
""Jerry Dee
60 matches
Mail list logo
