Re: Layer 3 switching and VLANs - an epiphany [7:63240]

2003-02-18 Thread Larry Letterman
your still a little off target... Layer 2 interfaces can be access ports or trunks for vlans Layer 2 or Layer 3 switch interfaces dont need to be sub-interfaces.. Layer 3 vlan interfaces(svi) require layer 2 trunk interfaces to interconnect vlans in other switches Layer 3 interfaces only require

Re: Layer 3 switching [7:63304]

2003-02-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm fairly certain the answer to your first question is no, the switch will not be intelligent enough to switch it to the appropriate port automatically. The reason is that the switch must go through a layer 3 device to get from one VLAN (aka IP subnet) to another. I don't think this is a real

Re: Layer 3 switching [7:63304]

2003-02-18 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 1:57 AM + 2/19/03, Han Chuan Alex Ang wrote: hi, I am trying to have a clearer picture of the layer 3 switching concept. Assuming that I have a Core Catalyst 6 series switch with layer 3 switching capabilities, I have a Access layer switch connected to the core with two port label Vlan

RE: Layer 3 switching [7:63304]

2003-02-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Han Chuan Alex Ang wrote: hi, I am trying to have a clearer picture of the layer 3 switching concept. Assuming that I have a Core Catalyst 6 series switch with layer 3 switching capabilities, I have a Access layer switch connected to the core with two port label Vlan 1 subnet 1

RE: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]

2001-05-06 Thread Ronny Jonathan
First, thanks for your answer Drew ... but I'm still confused ... It determines what information is stored in the mls entry and enforces all packets coming through the mls switch to be compared with the entry according to the flow mask specified with set mls flow. How about the note in the

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-12-21 Thread Muhammad Asif Rashid
Any 6500 series switch can be a layer 3 switch as well as the 3500 series and 2900 series, I believe. Thanks, -- ** Q. Wade Billings Product Operations Manager Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband _ FAQ,

Re: Layer 3 switching

2000-12-21 Thread Jeff Kell
Muhammad Asif Rashid wrote: Any 6500 series switch can be a layer 3 switch as well as the 3500 series and 2900 series, I believe. With many limitations. Check the documentation. It depends on the environment you want to put the switch into. Same for 2948G-L3 and other "layer 3" devices

Re: LAYER 3 SWITCHING

2000-10-09 Thread JEK
FRS, Layer 3 Switching, is not a situation when the CPU isn't involvedThat is Fast Switching, This is actually when routing information is stored in CACHE memory and it is processed without running as many interrupts to the CPU. And YES L3 switching does have everything to do with L2

RE: LAYER 3 SWITCHING

2000-09-29 Thread Roger Wang
Cisco's "layer 3 switching", simply put, refers to all routing processes except process switching (conventional routing with CPU). Namely, any routing process without CPU's intervention is considered "layer 3 switching". This has nothing to do with frames (layer 2) obviously. HTH, Rog

Re: LAYER 3 SWITCHING

2000-09-28 Thread Jason A. Diegmueller
1. What does the process Layer 3 switching refer to? "switching" has become a convuluted term. "switching", in marketing-speak, means "fast" for all intents and purposes. Thus, "L3 switching" is "fast routing". Have fun. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Guyler, Rik [EESUS]
Title: Layer 3 switching 2948G-L3 -- Basically a 48-port router! -Original Message-From: Fowler, Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 11:19 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Layer 3 switching I know there has been much discussion on this in

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Iohan Reyes
Title: Layer 3 switching I believe the 6000 series can be outfitted with a module to make it a layer-3 switch... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fowler, JoeySent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 11:19 AMTo: [EMAIL

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Q. Wade Billings
Any 6500 series switch can be a layer 3 switch as well as the 3500 series and 2900 series, I believe. Thanks, -- ** Q. Wade Billings Product Operations Manager Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband begin:vcard n:Billings;Q. Wade

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Plantier, William
Title: Layer 3 switching 6000 series switch, 5500, 4006 have a router module to put in it. -Original Message-From: Iohan Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 12:45 PMTo: Fowler, Joey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Layer 3 switching I

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Dwayne Cann
Please correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the 2900 and 3500 layer 2 only? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Q Wade Billings Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Layer 3 switching Any 6500

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Steve and Monica Brokaw
, 2000 12:37 PMTo: Cisco Group Study (E-mail)Subject: FW: Layer 3 switching -Original Message-From: Abruzzese, John Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:36 PMTo: Iohan ReyesSubject: RE: Layer 3 switching The Catalyst 6000 switch family will do layer 3 switching

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Abruzzese, John
-From: Steve and Monica Brokaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:48 PMTo: Abruzzese, John; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Layer 3 switching OK, maybe this is a question of semantics, maybe I'll get flamed, but here goes anyway. The 6000 series does

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Steve and Monica Brokaw
(E-mail)Subject: RE: Layer 3 switching In the 6000 family the MSFC acts as the MLS-RP, the equivalent of an RSM or Layer 3 router, and the Policy Feature Card(PFC) acts as the MLS-SE, which basically is the equivalent of the Net Flow Feature Card(NFFC) in the Cat 5000 family

RE: Layer 3 switching

2000-09-27 Thread Hartnell, George
Message- From: Guyler, Rik [EESUS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:00 AM To: Cisco Groupstudy (E-mail) Subject: RE: Layer 3 switching 2948G-L3 -- Basically a 48-port router! -Original Message- From: Fowler, Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesd

RE: LAYER 3 SWITCHING

2000-09-27 Thread Steve and Monica Brokaw
The answer is, every Cisco switch implements it differently. Try this link, it gives a basic explanation of each switch's method. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/july98/12.html Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of FRS

Re: Layer 3 switching vs. Layer 4 switching?

2000-07-03 Thread Evgeny Babanin
Francis, The process you have described looks more like "load-balancing"/"load-sharing" - Cisco LocalDirector supports that kind of traffic management. It seems that Layer4 switches do a bit difeerent thing (though mosty of them do load-balancing). We use FoundryNetworks Layer 4 switches in some

RE: Layer 3 switching vs. Layer 4 switching?

2000-06-26 Thread Francisco Muniz
I would think the process of directing to the lest loaded server would be higher in the stack than level 4. Except that the Alteon uses some statefull firewall like table where it remembers the sessions going in to each server, it would probably work best if all the servers are of alike power,

RE: Layer 3 switching vs. Layer 4 switching?

2000-06-15 Thread Francisco Muniz
On TCP/IP that would mean routing using TCP info (i.e. port number). When using certain apps (voice, for example) it's necessary that the router knows what app is it routing (by using upper layer info) so that it gives apps the service they need. Francisco Muniz "Ms. Maria" [EMAIL PROTECTED]