So to answer your original question, yes! So what do you have to study.
Well you might want to know how to set up simple label switching. This
includes P and PE. You might also want to setup VPNs using OSPF and IS-IS
as the transit IGP. You might also want to set it up using MP-BGP.
Also
um...I work with Optical/voice/cable/dsl.. I didn't know about this cert
but it sounds pretty good. I'm concentrating on the R/S right now because I
believe that it is a good foundation to expand from. I work for a
Cable/Telephone/Broadband Internet company that offers all 3 services over a
Uh, Are you sure? Take a look at the C/S lab requirements. Not the written
requirements, but the lab requirements. Notice how the lab has practically
nothing to do with the written(s).
Part of the great confusion over the C/S program is the fact that it has 8
possible writtens (each one
Tis a shame too. I ran a Vines network for about 8 years and have yet to
find a better protocol.
- Original Message -
From: ko haag
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
Same here, alot of my customers are still running most
: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track
getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful,
not
as
current.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
Here u go.
CCIE Communications Services
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36809t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
That C/S cert seems to be the way to go! That's what I'd go for, but since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way. I may go for that cert once I get my R/S
CCIE done. What makes that test so hard? And has anyone heard
recently in the real world.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track getting
Well no, I would actually argue that right now the Juniper JNCIE is the
better way to go, for a number of reasons. Yeah yeah, I know I'm going to
get flamed for that (and already had been, on previous occasions when I said
this). But the fact is, not only is the JNCIE program is testing on the
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
That C/S cert seems to be the way to go! That's what I'd go for, but since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way. I may go
be in the real world? I mean how many people out there actually work in a
optical/voice/dsl/cable environment in the same company?
Just my $0.2
From: Michael Cohen
Reply-To: Michael Cohen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:11:48 -0500
Where did you
Reply-To: Michael Cohen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:11:48 -0500
Where did you get you're information regarding only one person passing
the
C/S CCIE? I registered for the lab back in December and was told there
were
already 6 people
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not as
current.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Persio Pucci wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
How much of MPLS (if some at all) is
A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
as
current.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Persio Pucci wrote
://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/beta_exams.h
tm). Maybe we can expect a new recycle at the CCIE program?
Persio
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching
] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies that, although ar
Vines,
DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't seen
recently in the real world.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE
] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
For routing and switching - none. Is it me or is the RS track
getting
outdated? It seems to cover technologies
18 matches
Mail list logo
