rtant when using
additional devices like PC's in the routing domain.
-Mike Cohen
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
What do you ex
To: William E Gragido
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 6:29 PM
To: Billy Monroe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
Excuse me, but Microsoft, Novell and various Unix platforms have been
allowing for the routing of RIP and OSPF for a long time now. I have used
Windows 2000
forwarded from out small thread.
david
Original Message
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:52:47 -0700
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: "Marlon Brown" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my dreams I see a world wi
Excuse me, but Microsoft, Novell and various Unix platforms have been
allowing for the routing of RIP and OSPF for a long time now. I have used
Windows 2000 and it is functional.
a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Billy Monroe
Sent:
forwarded from a small thread.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:26 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: Marlon Brown
Subject:Re: Microsoft 'Routers'
I would bet that it doesn't as well, but then again, all
be much more expensive than a Cisco 25xx...
Thanks,
From: "William E Gragido" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Billy Monroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:29:03 -0500
Excuse me, but Microsoft
Yes, UNIX systems have had routing capabilities for a very long
time, but saying "since the beginning of the Internet" is probably a
bit of an exageration. In the beginning, there were things called,
IMP's, which were basically custom code running on IBM RT-PC's, that
handled routing
13, 2000 6:19 PM
To: 'Marlon Brown'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
I seriously don't think MS will hurt Cisco's routing business. Are you
telling me that ISP, Corp will start using MS as a router? MS may be used
as access point (hmmm
I see that Microsoft has provided resources to configure OSPF and RIP in
Windows 2000 servers
to provide routing capabilities.
It's a Microsoft port of Bay RS code, but not 100% compatible with Bay.
Has anybody evaluate this ? Do you think this could substitute 'real'
routers ?
Thanks,
FYI, unix has also had routing capabilities inherent in the operating
system, as well as software for BGP, OSPF, RIP and friends in free
software like routed/gated since the beginning of the Internet. But,
would I ever use any unix box for a router? Not unless it was five
years ago, it was
that MS Routing and Remote Access team is making huge investiments on
these Routing features.
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "David" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Billy Monroe"
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
Date: T
: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
What do you exactly mean by 'functional' ? Have you seen it working in
a live network ?
Unix for example, has provided more routing resources and it doesn't
seem to be a viable substitute for a router device.
Would Microsoft suggest to use the server as a router only
nt: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
I disagree with you regarding the support issue. They
could call the MCSE 2000 people :-)
I just want to see where they want to go with this routing
assumed ownership, I don't see any hope
in it.
- Original Message -
From: "Albert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Marlon Brown'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 8:19 PM
Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
I seri
14 matches
Mail list logo
