What a load of cisco bigotry crap! Thank god for you
guys who know better, huh? Even the folks at cisco
call this nonsense "drinking the kool-aid" for gods
sake. At least they don't believe their own marketing
BS. Normally I wouldn't even reply to such a post, but
Ive got some residual anger to ve
preach on brother!
I would have to agree with everything you said. Like I have posted before,
we were an extreme shop before we went cisco. (political BS) I have never
loved a piece of gear so much than the purple packet pushers we had in
house! :)
Telcos are already running fiber into subdiv
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
What a load of cisco bigotry crap! Thank god for you
guys who know better, huh? Even the folks at cisco
call
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
preach on brother!
I would have to agree with everything you said. Like I have posted before,
we were an extreme shop before we went cisco
into housing developments because they were built where facilities do
not exist (it's called PairGain & it's only good for phones & 144 IDSL
services)
Again- you've made valid points, I just don't think it's going to come upon
us like a thief in the night.
Phil
--
the wide open Internet
> is all some companies can afford & Frame is very
> slow in the Southwestern
> areas (TouchAmerica POP's). We have NAT because of
> IPV4, & we have fiber
> going into housing developments because they were
> built where facilities do
> no
All this is very educational and almost useless to the task at hand. Many of
us are here to prepare ourselves for the toughest test we've ever taken
outside of marriage (I aint kidding folks), and have chosen this path for
several good reasons. None of which are related to the sour grapes between
I wasn't going to clutter up the list and waste B/w, but you asked me to
enlighten you, and I guess the information should be available to all. Yes,
I am responding using a different email address because its convenient; but
I'm the same Robert Hanley.
If you read the thread in context I responde
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
Please don't take this the wrong way, I don't mean to
come off as being snotty, but you kind of make
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
I wasn't going to clutter up the list and waste B/w, but you asked me to
enlighten you, and I guess the information should be available to all. Yes,
I am responding using a different email address b
ield one will need to know more than how to swap a few disks
>to install Win2K or Netware. One may need to know more than a few basic IOS
>commands.
>
>JMHO
>
>Chuck
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Robert Hanley
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hanley
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
Chuck & group;
So, all this is understood about certs & why, etc...; and anyone who has
essage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RANT Longish, Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
preach on brother!
I would have to agree with everything you said. Like I have po
13 matches
Mail list logo
