Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-05 Thread nrf
Inlinw Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, I'm going to speculate for this company. Now why do they want to stay with Cisco? Mostly support I would imagine. If you have a completely Cisco shop, you are sometimes Willing to put up with extra

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-05 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Inlinw Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, I'm going to speculate for this company. Now why do they want to stay with Cisco? Mostly support I would imagine. If you have a completely Cisco shop, you are sometimes Willing to put up with

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-05 Thread Chuck
multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at the customer premises. In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-04 Thread Vajira Wijesinghe
Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at the customer premises. In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network equipment. The client continually insisted

RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-04 Thread Roberts, Larry
]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-04 Thread Vajira Wijesinghe
of business is this? Can you at least throw us a bone... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Hi Group

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-04 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
you at least throw us a bone... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Hi Group, Thank you very

RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Roberts, Larry
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you want edge density, Cisco doesn't have the best solution. Try a Juniper/Unisphere ERX1440. Oh whoops - I forgot, I'm not allowed to mention the evil

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Craig Columbus
OK...I've GOT to hear the story behind this. Why on earth would someone implement 188 T1 connections instead of multiple DS3 / HSSI ports, a couple OC3s or one OC12? At 02:44 PM 7/2/2002 +, you wrote: Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Brian
Tis why I suggested a channelized or muxed solution. All those loop charges every month, no friggin thanx. Bri - Original Message - From: Chuck To: Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:00 AM Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] must be nice to have so

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to be done on the central site. Network is hub and spoke fashion. Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for this purpose. I'm really puzzled what problem they are trying to solve.

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Brian Lodwick
. Brian Why can't we just go back to being UUNET? From: Howard C. Berkowitz Reply-To: Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:52:57 GMT Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Peter van Oene
Has your customer heard of channelized DS-3? At 02:44 PM 7/2/2002 +, you wrote: Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to be done on the central site. Network is hub and spoke fashion. Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central

RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Mike Bernico
http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-03 Thread Phillip Heller
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:44:43PM +, Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to be done on the central site. Network is hub and spoke fashion. Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site,

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-02 Thread Chuck
must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this summer? density will be a problem. 7206's with the PA-MC-8T1 cards - that will give you

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-02 Thread Chuck
Chuck wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this summer? density

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-02 Thread nrf
My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you want edge density, Cisco doesn't have the best solution. Try a Juniper/Unisphere ERX1440. Oh whoops - I forgot, I'm not allowed to mention the evil 'J' on this NG Chuck wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-02 Thread Chuck
the only reason I lead with Cisco is that I'm just a Cisco jock. When your only tool is a hammer, all your problems look like nails. Howard - don't start ;- Chuck nrf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you

Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]

2002-07-02 Thread Chuck
hey, if they can afford that many T1's, instead of going to DS3 or frame DS3 ( with all the failover protection that could be built in ) then they sure can afford to pay for Cisco's lack of port density. :- nrf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My question is - why