Some Sup II and III cards had a daughter card that performed the NFFC
function. Routing required a seperate card - RSM. Later Sup cards had the
NFFC function built into the main card. It supported an optional daughter
card with the routing function - RSFC. I'm not sure of the nomenclature
First off you can't order an MSFC without the PFC. The PFC is your
MultiLayerSwitching card basically. The MSFC2 can do about 600Kpps, but the
6500 can do 30Mpps with the PFC2. The NFFC has the same attributes as the
PFC. The RSFC fits on the Supervisor IIG and Supervisor IIIG, like the MSFC
You would hopefully never implement an RSFC or an RSM or an MSM
because they do not have the performance capabilities of either an MSFC1
or MSFC2. The actual question is, which chassis... 7603, 6506, 6509,
6513...
which Supervisor Engine... SUP1A, SUP2... which MSFC... MSFC1 or MSFC2...
how much
Hello,
When would one implement a RSFC over a RSM or a MSFC over a MSM? Also, do
these cards go along with a NFFC II (for the RSM or RSFC) and a PFC (for the
MSM or the MSFC)?
What would be the disadvantage if any of not using a NFFC II with a RSFC or
the PFC with the MSFC?
Thank you
The RSM and RSFC are used by the 5000, and the MSFC is used
by the 6000 family. I am not sure about the NFFC/RSM, But the
PFC is used here in our switches for policy switching, vacls and etc.
I believe the MSM was a fore-runner to the MSFC, however if I am wrong
I am sure some here will be quick
Hello,
When would one implement a RSFC over a RSM or a MSFC over a MSM? Also, do
these cards go along with a NFFC II (for the RSM or RSFC) and a PFC (for the
MSM or the MSFC)?
What would be the disadvantage if any of not using a NFFC II with a RSFC or
the PFC with the MSFC?
Thank you
te addresses, 172.16.x... The default
> route on the RSFC points to a PIX firewall - 172.16.1.1. Everything is
> working as it should.
>
> I created another VLAN on the same switch with outside, public addresses
> (198.x.x.x). Now because of the default route, all of that traffic is
>
sco 5505 switch with a Route Switch Feature Card. I have a
> bunch of VLANs configured with private addresses, 172.16.x... The default
> route on the RSFC points to a PIX firewall - 172.16.1.1. Everything is
> working as it should.
>
> I created another VLAN on the same switch
I hope you folks can help me with this. I KNOW there's an answer, but it
just eludes me.
I have a Cisco 5505 switch with a Route Switch Feature Card. I have a
bunch of VLANs configured with private addresses, 172.16.x... The default
route on the RSFC points to a PIX firewall - 172.1
) here)
access-list 101 permit tcp 10.10.100.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 80
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Evan Francen
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:46 PM
To: 'Kent Hawkins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RSFC
It is my understandin
It is my understanding that the RSFC supports the full Cisco router IOS, and
therefore, supports route-maps the same. The only difference being that the
RSFC uses the "interface vlan." Other than that, just the "ip policy
route-map map-tag", "route-map map-tag [permit
Does anyone have the config for setting up policy routing on an RSFC,
need to divert port 80 traffic into another VLAN without having escape
out the default gateway?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
12 matches
Mail list logo
