Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-03-04 Thread markh
really? -- >I have an official statement from Cisco that says that there will be no >UNIX, only NT. >I was there and it's true. > >MS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37230&t=17848 -- FAQ, list archives, and subsc

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-03-05 Thread DAve Diaz
Remember cisco have no money just $21 Billion dollars in the bank, so no new hardware for a while, no unix in a security lab that is absurb, Dave >From: "markh" >Reply-To: "markh" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848] >D

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2003-02-24 Thread Geoff Kuchera
>>>I believe it's called Market Share - there are far more Microsoft >>> >>>certified >>> >>>>folk than *nix certified folk. Try selling AVVID when you also have to >>> >>>tell >>> >>>>a customer that he has to hire

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2003-02-24 Thread nrf
gt; >>> > >>>>Call Manager for *nix??? hahahahahahahahahaha > >>>> > >>>>IIRC the last Cisco management software presentation, just about > >>> > >>>everything > >>> > >>>>is on NT or Win2K boxes these days. &g

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2003-02-25 Thread Geoff Kuchera
g that a potential > > customer > >>>>>does not want to hear. Not at all. This is why you rarely see any >>>> >>>>vendors >>>> >>>> >>>>>of enterprise software (like DB's, ERP, CRM, SCM, et

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2003-02-25 Thread nrf
>>> > >>>can > >>> > >>> > >>>>do > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>things like clustering to improve the reliability of CM, but the simple > >>>> > >>>>fa

RE: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2001-10-30 Thread Spoerr Mathias
I have an official statement from Cisco that says that there will be no UNIX, only NT. I was there and it's true. MS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24631&t=17848 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread sergei
h" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848] > >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:33:52 -0500 > > > >really? > >-- > > > > >I have an official statement from Cisco

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread Chuck
hile, no unix in a security lab that is absurb, > > > > Dave > > > > >From: "markh" > > >Reply-To: "markh" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848] > > >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:3

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread nrf
more... > > > > > > DAve Diaz wrote: > > > > > Remember cisco have no money just $21 Billion dollars in the bank, so > no > > > new hardware for a while, no unix in a security lab that is absurb, > > > > > > Dave > > > > > >

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread Chuck
gt; > > > DAve Diaz wrote: > > > > > > > Remember cisco have no money just $21 Billion dollars in the bank, so > > no > > > > new hardware for a while, no unix in a security lab that is absurb, > > > > > > > > Dave > >

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread nrf
t; existing Microsoft capable people. Same for the management platform. > same > > > for any of the security related software products. > > > > > > > > > > > > ""sergei"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROT

RE: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-24 Thread Mark W. Odette II
in the industry; there isn't just ONE O.S. that addresses all the use/needs of any particular business (keeping Support in mind). Now- Back to our regularly scheduled commentary on Cisco Studies. -Mark -Original Message- From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25

Re: CCIE Security Lab [7:17848]

2002-07-25 Thread nrf
t pi$$ed off he can't go > rebuild the kernel half a dozen times to "tweak" the system on > "Windows". > > And as a final note, I do maintain the argument that ALL of the OS's out > there have their own place in the industry; there isn't just ONE