On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> >Priscilla Oppenheimer
> >Sent:Friday, June 15, 2001 11:28 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:28 AM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
>
>VMS books were orange, as I recall!?
Yes,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
VMS books were orange, as I recall!?
Or maybe you are thinking of the
AIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kane, Christopher A.
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
Where can you get manageable copies of the original specifications? I've
only been in this environment fo
VMS books were orange, as I recall!?
Or maybe you are thinking of the convergence concurrence interface facility
that mapped the red book to the yellow book. Red and yellow make orange. On
the other hand, with electronic colors, we only have RGB, so who knows how
you make orange in our industr
>Final results of some search:
>
>> >For information (using my father's notes) the CCITT
>> >books-of-recommendations' colors were the following:
>> >- green in 1972,
>> >- yellow in 1980,
>> >- red in 1984
>> >- blue in 1988 (last 4-year-book).
>>
>> mutters because I distinctly remember a
Final results of some search:
> >For information (using my father's notes) the CCITT
> >books-of-recommendations' colors were the following:
> >- green in 1972,
> >- yellow in 1980,
> >- red in 1984
> >- blue in 1988 (last 4-year-book).
>
> mutters because I distinctly remember an Orange Book. 1
>This is quite interesting discussion going back into the roots of the
>current networking (which is in many ways quite a useful exercise, yet
>not performed often enough). I wish my father who was quite active in
>these network-forming days could add his knowledgeable views here -
>unfortunately,
baum)
> >Designing Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise
> >Networks (Berkowitz)
> >IPSEC (Doraswamy)
> >
> >
> >Christopher A. Kane, CCNP/CCDA
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mail
signing Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise
>Networks (Berkowitz)
>IPSEC (Doraswamy)
>
>
>Christopher A. Kane, CCNP/CCDA
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 3:1
At 03:18 PM 6/13/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >"Stephen Skinner" raised the interesting points,
>
>
>
> >So ,
> >
> >the answer to your question`s seem to be .
> >
> >Yes if your doing a Cisco Exam
> >
> >No if your reading info from the CCO
> >
> >Yes/No depending on who you are tal
outing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise Networks
(Berkowitz)
IPSEC (Doraswamy)
Christopher A. Kane, CCNP/CCDA
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
>"Stephen Skinner" raised the interesting points,
>So ,
>
>the answer to your question`s seem to be .
>
>Yes if your doing a Cisco Exam
>
>No if your reading info from the CCO
>
>Yes/No depending on who you are talking too..
>
>a Question has just popped into my head..."What else
So ,
the answer to your question`s seem to be .
Yes if your doing a Cisco Exam
No if your reading info from the CCO
Yes/No depending on who you are talking too..
a Question has just popped into my head..."What else that we quote as
law (given to us from Cisco and other sources )
This is quite interesting discussion going back into the roots of the
current networking (which is in many ways quite a useful exercise, yet
not performed often enough). I wish my father who was quite active in
these network-forming days could add his knowledgeable views here -
unfortunately, it i
>Fresh from reading for my Support exam from Cisco Press CIT SDLC is
>the granddaddy of them all. created in the mid-1970's to transport
>SNA. ISO modified SDLC to create HDLC. Then ITU-T modified HDLC to create
>LAP, then later, LAPB. IEEE modified HDLC to get 802.2, which is
Fresh from reading for my Support exam from Cisco Press CIT SDLC is
the granddaddy of them all. created in the mid-1970's to transport
SNA. ISO modified SDLC to create HDLC. Then ITU-T modified HDLC to create
LAP, then later, LAPB. IEEE modified HDLC to get 802.2, which is als
First, I'm going to take issue with what I consider an urban legend
that HDLC was based on SDLC. SDLC was first available in the first
SNA release in 1973. The HDLC family was the basis of the X.25 link
standards, including LAP in the 1972 CCITT specifications. But there
was quite bitter fe
Priscilla,
The only reading I have done on the LLC2 standard is from a book written by
Roosevelt Giles. From reading the book I got the impression that LLC was a
subset of HDLC and it was based on HDLC standard not the other way around.
I would have to respectfully disagree with the statement t
19 matches
Mail list logo
