We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new client software. We're not sure
why, but if one of these machines is connected to a 2924XL switch, it
regularly experiences a blue screen of death either at login or within 5
minutes of
have you tried this particular machine in the other switches?
sometimes a bad windows installation on a pc will blue screen no matter
what.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
Do you have portfast configured on those ports? It's a good idea.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Slightly OT: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death [7:32536]
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
> some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new client software. We're not sure
> why, but if one of these machines is connected to a 2924XL switch
We have several of these machines in our network. The only ones having
a problem are connected to 2924XLs. There was one here in our
department that was connected to a hub that was attached to a 1900 with
STP turned off. It had absolutely no issues whatsoever...until we moved
it to another drop
y, January 18, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: Slightly OT: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death [7:32536]
> We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
> some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new client software. We're not sure
> why, but if one of these ma
onally
destined for other sorts of devices constitutes an insufficient basis for
drawing inferences about the behavior of microsoft network clients.
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: 2924XL and
estined for other sorts of devices constitutes an insufficient basis for
> drawing inferences about the behavior of microsoft network clients.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:10 PM
> Subject:
There was that bug with Windows XP machines and MAC-layer port security.
Sorry I can't remember the details
I think it might have been with higher-end switches, though.
Please let us know what you find out. Sorry I don't have more info. I'm in
a rush. It IS Friday, afterall. ;-)
Priscilla
I had a similar problem , when I had a particular version of solaris install
on a HP Server with a Intel NIC, the entire network of HP Server running NT
Serof ver 4.0 would totally freeze , i..e no mouse movement, nothing NT
Server running on other platform works fine... I would suggest that m
John, my idea is to make "SURE" that the 2924XL has th latest code I
know it sounds a lil basic, but lately I have seen this curing my 2948s
issues.
John Neiberger wrote:
>We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
>some Dell PCs running Netware 6 and new c
Have you enabled portfast? sometimes things like this can happen because
the client is having difficulties seeing traffic to bind to. It takes
forever on a cisco cwitch to get a good link if portfast is not enabled.
-Patrick
>>> "Chuck Larrieu" 01/18/02 05:50PM >>>
have you tried this particu
I have seen this happen when you have a speed and duplex
mismatch. (actually 10baseT hooking into a 100baseT hub with no dual speed
mechanism, old school stuff). Then when you go into network neighborhood,
BOOM. Check that first. This might be the case if the NICs are only
10baseT hooking
What version of NetWare are the clients using? Some of this may only apply
to older versions.
Encapsulation issues are definitely a good place to start. You say that the
router is using sap (802.2) but the client is using Windows 95, which
probably did not default to 802.2. It probably def
thanks for taking the time to read through this, Cil. The problem continues
to be a source of frustration for my client and for me.
some comments / responses below:
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What version of NetWare are the clients
I wondered about type-20 propagation also, but that's only to get NetBIOS
through an IPX network. It's so that Windoze networking will work over an
IPX internetwork. I don't think that's relevant.
You said that the routers aren't using internal network numbers, but I'm
more concerned about the
no sniffer? Ethereal is free... So is Linux! : ) How about some tcpdump?
>>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 01/24/02 04:09PM >>>
I wondered about type-20 propagation also, but that's only to get NetBIOS
through an IPX network. It's so that Windoze networking will work over an
IPX internetwork. I d
17 matches
Mail list logo
