Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-02 Thread MADMAN
1 > contention. Lets face it what are the chances of the three buildings > loading 14 MB each at the same time??? I say nil > > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 February 2002 19:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Chuck Larrieu
t presents a question I have. for > the central site, the aggregate port speed is less than 2 DS3, but how can > you assign those DLSIs to the 2 DS3 access circuits? > > > >From: "John Neiberger" > >To: , > >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] > >Dat

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Yatou Wu
thanks for your reply. would you please explain more? sorry for asking because I am new to the networking field. yatou >From: "Patrick Ramsey" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 15:33:42 -0500

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Yatou Wu
ement in >central >site would be 84mb. should I order 2 T3 access circuits or 3 at the >central >site? if 2, how can i config the 3 DLCI across the 2 T3 circuits? >because >there would be 1 DLCI needed to be split between the 2 T3 circuits. > >thanks again! > >Yatou >

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Chuck Larrieu
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 February 2002 19:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] > > > Some telcos have some basic oversubscription requirements, designed more so > that they can sell you more bandwidth t

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Patrick Ramsey
ouch! we have no such restrictions here in Atlanta! :) >>> "Chuck Larrieu" 02/01/02 02:34PM >>> Some telcos have some basic oversubscription requirements, designed more so that they can sell you more bandwidth than as a real practical requirement. Here in California, for example, the local te

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Patrick Ramsey
ite? if 2, how can i config the 3 DLCI across the 2 T3 circuits? because there would be 1 DLCI needed to be split between the 2 T3 circuits. thanks again! Yatou >From: "Patrick Ramsey" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] &g

RE: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Graham, Darel R.
get that much traffic out? The best bet would be a T3 at the remote sites too. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] Is ATM a consideration? I believe

RE: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread McCallum, Robert
: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 19:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] Some telcos have some basic oversubscription requirements, designed more so that they can sell you more bandwidth than as a real practical requirement. Here in

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Philip Palanchi
The bandwidth on the hub router's frame interface in a pure multipoint topology should be the CIR x the number of PVC's. ""Yatou Wu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > if there are one central site and three remote sites. all the remote sites > need to conne

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread John Neiberger
across the 2 T3 circuits? because there would be 1 DLCI needed to be split between the 2 T3 circuits. thanks again! Yatou >From: "Patrick Ramsey" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:41:34 -0500

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Some telcos have some basic oversubscription requirements, designed more so that they can sell you more bandwidth than as a real practical requirement. Here in California, for example, the local telco permits no more than a 2 for 1 oversubscription. So if you have 20 spokes, each at 256K CIR, th

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Chuck Larrieu
on to have the aggregate amount of all three remote sites. > > -Original Message- > From: Yatou Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: frame relay question [7:34090] > > > Hi, > > if ther

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Chuck Larrieu
t;Patrick Ramsey" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:34090] > >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:41:34 -0500 > > > >I usually use the 1 to 8 rule for every 8mb you think you need, order > >1 > > > >Will

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Yatou Wu
ntral site? if 2, how can i config the 3 DLCI across the 2 T3 circuits? because there would be 1 DLCI needed to be split between the 2 T3 circuits. thanks again! Yatou >From: "Patrick Ramsey" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: frame relay question [7:3

RE: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Stull, Cory
relay question [7:34090] Hi, if there are one central site and three remote sites. all the remote sites need to connect to the central site. now I need to decide the access circuit and port speed for the central site. the CIR requirement are following: Remote site A: 14M Remote site B: 14M Remote

Re: frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Patrick Ramsey
I usually use the 1 to 8 rule for every 8mb you think you need, order 1 Will each facility be pumping a solid 14mb across the wan all day long? If so, one ds3 (45mb) will suffice at the HQthen purchase shaped DS3 circuits for the WAN... (15mb shape) -Patrick >>> "Yatou Wu" 02/01/02

frame relay question [7:34090]

2002-02-01 Thread Yatou Wu
Hi, if there are one central site and three remote sites. all the remote sites need to connect to the central site. now I need to decide the access circuit and port speed for the central site. the CIR requirement are following: Remote site A: 14M Remote site B: 14M Remote site C: 14M how many