off-topic: anyone alarmed?

http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/03/09/technology/cisco/ _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

Maybe a large proportion of the 16% lay-offs should be amongst the financial guru's who predicted 55% growth in the first place. How terrible, only 40% growth. Can a company grow exponentially forever? If everybody else was having a wild time it would be more worrying. (If I had Cisco shares I sup

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

AIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 01:48 Subject: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/03/09/technology/cisco/ > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > &g

RE: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

this affect whether you want/need to be a >CCIE? Will the market now have a glut of CCIEs since companies don't need >as many any more. > >What to do think?? > >Kevin Wigle > >- Original Message ----- >From: "Dropped Packet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

D]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 14:08 Subject: RE: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > My 2p OK, > > Why should Cisco determine how many CCIE's are "required" ? > If they mean for themselves,

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 01:48 Subject: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/03/09/technology/cisco/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

Does it occur to anyone else that it's strange to put CCIE's in "project management" when the CCIE program doesn't, in the slightest, test for project management skills? >just a correction, it wasn't a newspaper but an article on ZDNet: > >http://www.zdnet.com/sp/stories/news/0,4538,2693233-1,

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

ertification training dollar, but will that continue in the wake of these shake-ups? Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 16:09 Subject: Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

rticle is the opinion of the authors, and not necessarily the position that Cisco is taking for the CCIE. - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:09 PM Subject: Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > Doe

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

IE. > > > - Original Message ----- > From: Howard C. Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:09 PM > Subject: Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > > > > Does it occur to anyone else that it's stran

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

ion > that Cisco is taking for the CCIE. > > > - Original Message - > From: Howard C. Berkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:09 PM > Subject: Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > > > > Does it o

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

and another article... http://idg.net/crd_idgsearch_466265.html?sc=66050602_87574 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

to continue the thread, I've found a news release on Cisco's website: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_030501.html Quote: Balanced Approach to Technical Staffing The previous Cisco Channel Partner Program emphasized employing individuals who have earned a Cisco Certified Internetworking Exp

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

is it just me or is that saying that if you're a reseller/sales person then you'd better get your CCIE to keep your job? nah...that's too crazy. --- Kevin Wigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and another article... > > http://idg.net/crd_idgsearch_466265.html?sc=66050602_87574 > > __

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

gle - Original Message - From: "Dan West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 22:54 Subject: Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed? > is it just me or is that say

Re: off-topic: anyone alarmed?

27;t need > as many any more. > > What to do think?? > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message ----- > From: "Dropped Packet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, 11 March, 2001 01:48 > Subject: off-topic: anyone alarmed?