To the Group,
I currently have a situation where I need some advice or some
suggestions for where to look for information. I have a client who is
an ISP. I was called by a contact there and told to remove a static
route - it belonged to a customer who was using their T1 service but had
chan
HI all.
In configuring static route between a central site
router and a branch office router, do we need to
configure static route on both routers? or either of
them? or only central site router? or only branch
office router? and why?
Thanks in adv.
HI all.
Situation:
There is a central site in San Francisco, and four
branches around Bay area.
Since static route gives us faster traffic
transmission, would it be the most desirable way to
configure static route on all routers, regardless
whether it is a central site router or branch office
rout
Title: RE: Static Route Question
We are assuming the T1 is no longer there!?
-Original Message-
From: Nadine Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Static Route Question
To the Group,
I currently have a
---
> From: Nadine Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Static Route Question
>
> To the Group,
> I currently have a situation where I need some advice or some
> suggestions for where to look
Message-
> > From: Nadine Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 2:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Static Route Question
> >
> > To the Group,
> > I currently have a situation where I need some advic
and create there own routes.
Good Luck,
E-mail with Questions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message Follows
From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Groupstudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Static route question !!
Date: Fri, 8
In a static topology, there's no need for a dynamic routing protocol. Only
when the lack of flexibility and slow (manual) reconfiguration become issues
do you need to think about routing protocols. For a simple, stable network,
use static routes.
-Gabriel McCall, CCDP/CCNP+Sec
"jeongwoo park" <[
IL PROTECTED]
Subject: static route question ??
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
HI all.
Situation:
There is a central site in San Francisco, and four
branches around Bay area.
Since static route gives us faster traffic
transmission, would it be the most desirable way to
configure sta
IL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: static route question ??
>Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
>
>HI all.
>Situation:
>There is a central site in San Francisco, and four
>branches around Bay area.
>
Static routes does seem the best way to go in your situation. If it is a hub and spoke
arrangment as i believe it to be in your case then static routes must be configured on
the central router pointing to the networks on the remote locations and static routes
must also be configured on the remo
ral office, or do the branches talk to each
> other? If so, a default
> route or a routing protocol might be a better option
> to avoid having to
> specify each network.
>
> Priscilla
>
> >----Original Message Follows
> >From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL
her? If so, a default
> > route or a routing protocol might be a better option
> > to avoid having to
> > specify each network.
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> > >Original Message Follows
> > >From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
Quick question, what would be the best way to configure a description of a
static route, if possible? For example:
ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2
! Static route to Web Server
I know how to put the description on an interface, but the static route
table is separate. Any suggestions on wha
14 matches
Mail list logo
