Re: written [7:45056]

2002-08-26 Thread Peter van Oene
I would suggest that there is not always a right answer. I have seen a few questions who's answers are at best very ambiguous. On one of my recerts, I believe I spent more time writing comments than answering questions due to poorly worded questions. At 04:02 AM 5/26/2002 -0400, Kris Keen

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-08-26 Thread Peter van Oene
How is that for a belated reply. Resorted my msg box and got a little confused :) At 02:17 PM 8/26/2002 +, you wrote: I would suggest that there is not always a right answer. I have seen a few questions who's answers are at best very ambiguous. On one of my recerts, I believe I spent

RE: written [7:45056]

2002-05-30 Thread Loken, Bjorn
Oh just for the record, ever hear of a bandwidth domain? If you have please let me know about it because I can't find it anywhere. I know I've encountered that expression somewhere, whether that was in the sybex CCDA books or one of the certificationzone papers I can't remember. Anyway, as

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Well, consider this too: Cisco has either monkeys or complete idiots classifying the questions. Or maybe it's very poorly-written software that does it. I'm not sure. But the bottom line: If you get a low percentage in a particular topic area, it doesn't mean that you don't know that topic.

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Kris Keen
It sounds like you dont know the topics. The exam is VERY VERY easy for any CCIE candidate, I find that if you are scoring 69% you do not know your topics. There is always a right answer in the questions, instead of complaining how about you study the topics until you understand them? Cheers

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Security Consultant CCSE, CSS1, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Erwin Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/2002 01:57 PM Please respond to Erwin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] How would you know that the particular question does not have

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Erwin
respond to Erwin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] How would you know that the particular question does not have a correct answer, based on the score you get--69%-- It does not sound convincing to me. Even you get that question

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread cebuano
Subject: Re: written [7:45056] It sounds like you dont know the topics. The exam is VERY VERY easy for any CCIE candidate, I find that if you are scoring 69% you do not know your topics. There is always a right answer in the questions, instead of complaining how about you study the topics until

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Kris Keen
Its the cost! here here.. In any case, the exam is fairly straight forward and basic, I wouldnt pass a student if he scored 1% below the pass, because its clear that he doesn't know the work. If he scored 95% and was debating a answer, I'd be more inclinded to hear what he has to say. Cisco

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread cebuano
I totally agree with Kris on this, but with some sympathy reserved to the origin of the post. The current RS is VERY elementary when compared with it's beta. If you score around 80 in the current exam I can tell you that number would be somewhere around 50 in the upcoming exam. On the lighter

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
think you are from Mars! Theo Erwin Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/2002 07:31 PM Please respond to Erwin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] Having passed all CISSP, CSS1, CCIE Security, CSPFA, MCNS, etc. does not a guarantee

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the common internetworking environment environment. Theo Kris Keen Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/2002 10:08 PM Please respond to Kris Keen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] Its the cost! here here.. In any case, the exam is fairly

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Frank Merrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And get this! I am a CISSP and a CSS1 and CCSE. You would think that I know security right? I got a 0% on the CID security section twice! I still don't know why. How could I not know enough when I got over 900 on each of the CSS1 tests all on the first

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Michael L. Williams
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yeah Kris you are right. I lost about $120 on the CID and got angry. Because of this, I converted a $500,000 Cisco network into a $300,000 Foundry network and my customer is really happy about it. ;-)I wasn't angry that I

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Kevin Jones
I too got a 0% on the security portion of the CID. I passed the exam with an 8--. I am pretty sure I had more than 1 security question, and I am certain that I got at least 1 right. I came away with the impression that maybe some of the questions I felt were security questions happened to, for

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. yes I took it personally. I had to give the score report to my boss! Michael L. Williams Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/27/2002 01:35 AM Please respond to Michael L. Williams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] wrote

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to Kevin Jones To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] I too got a 0% on the security portion of the CID. I passed the exam with an 8--. I am pretty sure I had more than 1 security question, and I am certain that I got at least 1 right. I came

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/27/2002 01:16 AM Please respond to Frank Merrill To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And get this! I am a CISSP and a CSS1 and CCSE. You would think that I know security

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Kevin Cullimore
I've taken). - Original Message - From: To: Sent: 26 May 2002 4:44 am Subject: Re: written [7:45056] Yeah but I can sympathize with you man because several times on the test I think that Cisco is wrong. Usually, Cisco is right on and I have to agree because the right answer is just

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the other vendors as well. Theo Kevin Cullimore Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/27/2002 08:44 AM Please respond to Kevin Cullimore To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: written [7:45056] Dealing with poorly worded questions can sometimes serve as good

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-26 Thread Kevin Cullimore
Just a few clarificatory points inline: - Original Message - From: To: Kevin Cullimore Cc: ; Sent: 26 May 2002 9:41 pm Subject: Re: written [7:45056] I agree with your statement about poorly worded questions. However, this is just an excuse for a poorly written test! Oh just

written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread CJ
Having obtained 69% and failing the CCIE qualification, There was one question which did not have a correct answer. Whom do I contact at Cisco address this issue. [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not yet replay since the last 4 days. Message Posted at:

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread Brad Ellis
Contact Sylvan Prometric or VUE to reschedule your test! Good luck. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net CJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Having obtained 69% and failing the CCIE qualification, There

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-25 Thread Erwin
How would you know that the particular question does not have a correct answer, based on the score you get--69%-- It does not sound convincing to me. Even you get that question rewarded to you, it does not mean you will get 70% since I believe it is calculated using a statistical analysis