On 08/12/2013 06:53 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
The questions comes down to whether remote console is sufficient or if
remote power is also required.
Hmm, the only thing I could find is to press ctrl-C three times in a row
at the RP rommon
On 07/30/2013 08:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
All,
Having a similar situation here. Hoping to get more feedback then Phil
ever did.
Is there a way through console only to worm back into the
SP/rommon/reset?
I can boot an old msfc image on the RP (hybrid mode with both SP and
RP running IOS),
On Monday, January 23, 2012 03:30:14 PM Jeff Bacon wrote:
...
The Cat6k got its start as an L2 device. It was that until some
bright boy decided to gut a 7200 NPE and glue it into the supervisor
and create the MSFC.
...
Just another $0.02 in the pot.
:-)
The Cat6k got its start as the Cat5k.
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 05:00:03 PM Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
Hi, Gert I figured the RSFC reference would get a nod :-)
Ah, the times. The RSFC actually came later, the RSM was before that -
not a feature card for the Sup, but a full-sized 7500-RSP2 folded into
a cat5k line
On Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:57:45 PM Jason Berenson wrote:
NAME: Line Card 6, DESCR: Versatile Interface Processor (VIP6-80)
PID: VIP6-80 , VID: Hardware Version : 2.01 Board Revision :
A0, SN: 29452845
NAME: Card Slot 6, Bay 0, DESCR: GigabitEthernet Port Adapter
PID: PA-GE
On Monday, September 12, 2011 05:45:06 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
I would be interested to hear your opinion on how tcp over multicast would
work.
Of course, straight TCP won't work over multicast. There are other protocols
which will meet the suggestions of RFC 3048.
But I agree with your
On Monday, September 12, 2011 07:47:14 PM Persio Pucci wrote:
The bad part is that I believe my customers (and the boss) won't take
that's how UDP works for an answer. Although there's TCP Replay for the
multicast streams, it is somewhat delayed from the realtime data and that
puts them behind
On Monday, September 12, 2011 07:38:38 AM Persio Pucci wrote:
I am having some problems trying to figure out what could be causing UDP
packets get out-of-sequence on some multicast streams (market data) between
Sao Paulo and New York.
You may know all of what I'm going to say below... but just
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:08:53 PM Jason Gurtz wrote:
A firm has proposed creating a GRE tunnel between two datacenters (using a
3750X stack at each) to create the spanned vlans needed for VMWare
failover application.
Clearly there is tunnel overhead but I sense there are other failure
On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 01:54:00 PM Jay Ford wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, vince anton wrote:
Anyone has experiemces to share or known v6 issues with SXF (or v4 issues
with v6 enabled for that matter), or should I be looking at SRC/SRD/SRE for
7600 ?
I have 9 6500+SUP720-3BXL boxes with a
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 08:51:34 PM Righa Shake wrote:
Am receiving the following error on my Cisco ASR POS Interface.
%SONET-4-ALARM: SIP0/0: POS0/0/0: B3 BER exceeds threshold, TC alert
declared.
Any help in finding a solution so as not to get the alarm will be
appreciated.
I've
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 02:29:23 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
Good afternoon list.
I'm trying to find a document describing, concisely, the differences between
the old 'classic' 6148-RJ45 10/100 48 port card and the 6248-RJ45 and
6348-RJ45.
I've received a number of private replies
Good afternoon list.
I'm trying to find a document describing, concisely, the differences between
the old 'classic' 6148-RJ45 10/100 48 port card and the 6248-RJ45 and
6348-RJ45. None of the usual information sources is being much help; looked
through Cisco's docs on their ethernet linecards,
On Friday, January 14, 2011 02:28:42 pm Jim McBurnett wrote:
It's been a long time... But a spectrum analyzer with a directional antenna
is really cool to use for this...
The Wi-Spy works pretty well, and much less expensive than some of the portable
spec-ans out there. See
On Friday, January 07, 2011 01:07:44 pm Peter Serwe wrote:
Sorry,
ASA 5520, 7.x SW version.
Does the SW for ASA not allow the equivalent of IOS NAT's ability to apply a
route-map to NAT? See
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t4/feature/guide/ftnatrt.html
On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:45:15 am Keegan Holley wrote:
The link above says it's available on the 6500 which is definitely not CPU
based or non-distributed. I was hoping for something like NSF where it just
trusts the info in TCAM while the reload/re-convergence happens in the
On Monday, January 03, 2011 07:23:27 pm John Neiberger wrote:
So, I think some sort of layer two tunneling is in order. What are our
options if we want to make DeviceA and DeviceB think they're local to
each other and in the same LAN? I've heard of L2TP and of various MPLS
techniques that
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 01:04:04 pm Jared Mauch wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:12 PM, ML wrote:
I've often wondered if people pay attention to the firmware of their
linecards.
I wonder how many people know there is another level of software at play
and that it could be upgraded
My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to
fruition. However, I have one question.
Does the GEIP+ support 1000BASE-T GBICs? I don't need it to be eligible
for Cisco support; I just need it to work.
Failing that, does the C4912G support 1000BASE-T GBICs?
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 10:36:54 am Charles Mills wrote:
Older Layer 3 gear being what it is I'm already aware does everything
in software if it supports it at all.
Oh, I ran across a quote yesterday while doing some additional research into
the IPv6 capabilities and caveats with hardware I
On Saturday 27 March 2010 05:22:35 pm neal rauhauser wrote:
I have a pair of 7200s at two locations with a 155mbit radio link between
them. We're hooking up PA-POS across this and I am wondering how to best
bridge across the link.
See Bridging Control Protocol (BCP) (
On Mar 8, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
- on the platforms where you have a choice, go to the feature
navigator
(http://www.cisco.com/go/fn) and find an IOS version that has all
the
features that you want, and has *no letters* attached, and has a
high
number in
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
For mainstream platforms (7200, not NPE-G2) with mainstream IOS
versions
(few letters), I have found it to be quite useful.
Oh, I certainly find it to be useful. But compare 12.4(18c) (which is
what TAC sent me last year for a IOS security
their pedigree by certain features
lacking). The two 7401's were paired for the OC3 POS APS, but the second
one developed issues when loaded very heavily and is now a backup only.
It's the same IOS that Cisco 7204 ?
No; almost the same as NSE-1, but specific to the chassis.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief
.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On Monday 15 June 2009 07:08:03 pm Justin Krejci wrote:
There appears to be a fair amount of threads online about using LX and LH
together on a SMF link. I have a situation where there is a 7206VXR with an
NPE-G1 that has a LX GBIC installed that is talking via SMF to a 12000
series router to
On Friday 29 May 2009 10:42:32 am Bill Blackford wrote:
Is the 12.1 the latest series for this switch?
Yes.
What is 12.1 E?
Enterprise train.
Variants are also found on the Catalyst 8540 CSR and MSR, Cat 8510 CSR/MSR,
and Lightstream 1010. A 12.1E was also available for 7500 and 7200, I
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 01:51:37 pm Bill Blackford wrote:
I may need to use 110V NEMA 5-20
plugs.
Can the 3000W power supply (in redundant mode) support a fully populated
6509 chassis (no POE) when using 110VAC?
A NEMA 5-20 plug can only support a max normal load of 80% of 2400W
(2...@120v),
On Friday 08 May 2009 05:25:31 pm Pete Templin wrote:
I'm in the process of bringing up my first SONET APS-protected
(single-router APS) link, and it's been an adventure.
Is this a true 'single-router' APS setup, or is it a 'multirouter' APS setup
that just happens to be on a single router?
On Sunday 19 April 2009 08:34:07 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
According to Software Advisor you need the wan image for OSM cards (like
you said). Interestingly enough, SIPs/SPAs do not seem to need it.
Nevertheless, it's hard to believe that OSMs are responsible for the
additional 33% of
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 11:34:34 Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 18:22:03 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
For the life of us, we can't seem to get any more than 60Mbps
sustained across the ATM testing with iperf, so we're just trying to
figure out if the GSR just can't push any more than
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 18:22:03 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
For the life of us, we can't seem to get any more than 60Mbps
sustained across the ATM testing with iperf, so we're just trying to
figure out if the GSR just can't push any more than what it's doing or
if there's something else afoot.
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 12:11:10 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Again, the bandwidth going over the entire box is like 650Mbps spread
more or less evenly across the two LCs.
Just a quick comment on this statement, and then in a few days I'll see if I
can't set up a back-to-back test with the 12012
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 13:42:08 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 15-Apr-09, at 1:30 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
How much latency end-to-end in the setup with/without the 12008?
12ms (Toronto to New York and back) with the 12008. Haven't hair
pinned a port on the New York Fore yet, so can't
path PSE's are being reported by the SONET cloud. So it
could be the interstital hop clock slipping.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 11:44:41 Pete Templin wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
It's also possible the ADM is sending you a too-hot signal; you can
simulate an attenuator for testing by slightly pulling the SC for the
receive out; this simulates an air-gap attenuator. If you can get
or HWIC.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
to
Frame Relay Interworking, AFAIK).
I found some reference to BICI on CCO but nothing specific.
Try with a dash: B-ICI.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
.
Possibly a hardware issue.
But please see
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a01538.shtml
as that might entitle you to a newer IOS for the beast.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
to the 12.1E
train.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
. (www.ntop.org).
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
.
Also note that the quad OC3 line cards in the 12000 have some limitations as
to clocking individual ports.
Also, what IOS versions are you running?
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 06:33:47 luismi wrote:
Any recommendation about a usb to serial adapter?
We work with linux here in our laptops and some of the adapters we used
in the past got stuck when they receive too much info very quickly (for
example, messages from console) so I would like to
Ok, I'm having an odd difficulty, and am trying to determine how to go about
troubleshooting it.
I have two routers at my border, a 7401ASR and a 7507/RSP8, both running 12.4
mainline. The two routers are both running iBGP to each other and eBGP to my
provider. The two routers are providing
on version and console) right after you see the ROMMON banner.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
of packets taking the PXF path
is a very small fraction.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
. I don't, unfortunately, have any metrics on just how
much faster the 7401 is, sorry.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
mainline, with the
7507 and 12012 on the near end running 12.0S.
12.0S has a later version of the APS protocol, PGP, than 12.4 mainline does
(version 3 for 12.0S, and version 1 for 12.4 mainline). Go figure.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI
On Monday 09 February 2009 12:50:54 Justin Shore wrote:
Manaf Al Oqlah wrote:
The problem is that I still can see some
clients IP addresses lease expiration are Infinite in the DHCP binding!
what could be the reason for this behavior and could be this some sort of
attack!!
I get them
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 22:26:27 Brant I. Stevens wrote:
Cisco Press has the book Integrated Cisco and UNIX Architectures
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587051214 that is an
interesting read.
I have that one too, and it is indeed an interesting read.
at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns815/networking_solutions_program_home.html
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
i just replaced a failing 7401ASR with a 7507 with RSP8's on an APS-protected
OC3. The protect is a 7401ASR, and both are running 12.4 mainline.
The 7507 is the working, and traffic is passing, but I get an odd message when
I
issue show aps:
POS0/0/0 APS Group 2: working channel 1 (Active
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 09:24:33 Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
I'm going to look through the list archives and see if I can find those
references. Everything that I've seen revolves around earlier iterations of
the code, not the S15 release that has been out for a year.
Hmm, is there a better
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 10:19:39 Lamar Owen wrote:
See http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nspm=113154141708694w=2 for Rodney's take
on it a while back.
Also see http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nspm=116645064330255w=2
and http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nspm=113340513407711w=2
and http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nspm
On Monday 10 November 2008 11:05:03 Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
Hello,
Over the weekend, we updated one of our 7513s from 12.2.25S12 to the
12.2.25S15. The driver behind this was service policies used for LLQ
dropping from interfaces, causing all sorts of havoc w/ our voice
prioritization.
.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
, as the network provides the
clock.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
On Friday 10 October 2008 17:01:57 Richard Golodner wrote:
I forgot how, but there exists a weekly digest of the table sizes
that you can have emailed to you, or you can look at cidr or apnic too. If
anybody remembers the link to the weekly digest please post it so others
who may be
inch
weatherheads with glued-in 1-1/2 reducers. More materials, higher cost;
lower price.
Go figure.
Pricing has everything to do with how much one is willing to pay.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http
simple, and vlan pruning on trunks has not yet
become an issue, so none are pruned currently. Your mileage may vary; your
setup may be complex enough to think carefully about what vlans propagate
over which trunks.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1
for 12.0(32)S11 on 12000 GRP...)).
I know, moot point as RSFC/RSM and the whole Cat5K series is EOL'ed, but a guy
can dream.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
828-862-5554
www.pari.edu
-feely your router needs to do on the
packets; 12000's are very aloof in that regard.
-
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
upgrade like
that worth it.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
not properly bonded to the electrical service ground; if
the electrodes are even a few feet apart they can, in the lightning
field/current gradient of a strike, easily have 15-50 thousand volts
between 'grounds'.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI
, it means the RSFC's in my 5500's have just gained
a new lease on life.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
between different IOS versions (and
trains).
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
you're looking
at is OpenNMS. www.opennms.org
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
. APS would still require two
chassis; there is a single router APS option, but only with specific
linecards and specific chassis.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
the SNMP version. Don't have a 6500 to try
with. Of course, CatOS has show module; but the RSM doesn't have show
inventory.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
at the DR); VMotion
requires layer 2 adjacency (and does MAC hijacking, which has its own things,
but I'm not that far yet) between the two ESX hosts in order to work.
Thanks in advance for any responses.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
, but higher
speed async signals might suffer from increased crosstalk.
You can see the way SCSI LVD/SE cables are laid out by looking at
http://www.paralan.com/lvdmsepinout.html
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http
/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch1_:_Network_Backups_With_Rancid
and see if that meets your needs.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
http://www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
, pluggable optics, etc.
So you want to issue a 'show inventory raw' command and capture the results,
essentially, right?
Seems rancid could do this, as it can produce arbitrary scripts and diff the
results; perhaps a rancid expert here (which I'm not) can further comment.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief
. And while I know
that there is a contingent out there with the attitude that if someone can't
afford rolling forklift upgrades every few years that they shouldn't be in
business, I have no need for their opinion on that matter.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research
, that not
everything is on the DVD, and it pulls in stuff from the deprecated univercd
area. Of course, it's a couple of years old and may have been fixed by now.
But there are a lot of documentation CD's and DVD's out there that will be
broken when this change occurs.
--
Lamar Owen
www.pari.edu
. (safari.informit.com; subscription to
this costs, but I find it to be worthwhile).
Hope that helps!
--
Lamar Owen
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
[I know, replying to my own message is poor form, but I forgot to show how to
add an ELAN]
On Friday 25 April 2008, Lamar Owen wrote:
lane database parilane
name pari server-atm-address 47.003CA700.0090BF2EF071.C0
default-name pari
Here's where you would add an ELAN
in the GEIP+ is cute, but the 'PA' from it is not, to
the best of my knowledge and search of various resources, supported as a
dual-width PA by a 7200 (unlike the SRPIP OC12's alter ego, the PA-SRPIP).
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC
for the GRP-B are 'four sided' with double-sided and
double-thick.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
-512=
MBUS Agent Software version 1.117 (RAM) (ROM version is 3.6)
ROM Monitor version 2.2
Primary clock is CSC 1
Board State is IOS Running ACTIVE (ACTV RP )
Insertion time: 00:00:07 (1w5d ago)
DRAM size: 536870912 bytes
--
Lamar Owen
www.pari.edu
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Saku Ytti wrote:
Looks you indeed have tiny fraction in PXF, guess you're not running
12.2S family, where I believe PXF is not supported at all in
this platform.
Nope, running 12.4.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
of an
APS router pair? (A third router at location B would be difficult)
Many thanks in advance for any pointers that can be provided.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
there.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
as a router-on-a-stick but then you can use a layer 2 Cat4k or 5k for
cheap access.
The 3.6Gbps three-way backplane buses on the Cat 5513 might be a limitation
here, though.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
Wasn't the 2948G the odd one that could do L3, but only the uplinks?
That was the 2948G-L3, which was EOLed very quickly, and deserved so.
I'd be curious as to why.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief
'BluePrints' that has a whole host
of good books in it. The one I have is Enterprise Data Center Design and
Methodology and it covers these physical things very well.
Also check the Data Center Knowledge website for pointers:
datacenterknowledge.com is the site.
Hope that helps!
--
Lamar Owen
introduction and
explanation of the technology.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
will be slower, in many cases MUCH slower than those 8540's are; the
8540's do wire-speed routing, with 5Gbps full-duplex non-blocking bandwidth
to each slot, and are very fast as long as your port density requirements
aren't very high (mine aren't).
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah
).
If you'd like pointers to some good books, let me know and I'll reply offlist.
--
Lamar Owen
Chief Information Officer
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
91 matches
Mail list logo
