On 2/24/10 10:10 PM, Erwan David wrote:
Le Wed 24/02/2010, Dennis Peterson disait
There are relatively few end points on the Internet that send mail
out without going through an ISP's gateway.
I'm not so sure about this. Compaies do not use ISP gateways...
Count the companies vs end users.
Le Wed 24/02/2010, Dennis Peterson disait
> There are relatively few end points on the Internet that send mail
> out without going through an ISP's gateway.
I'm not so sure about this. Compaies do not use ISP gateways...
--
Erwan
___
Help us build a c
On 2/24/10 9:15 AM, Jim Preston wrote:
No Dennis, you would just know they are coming from the spammer and not
zombies. Then again, there would be far fewer zombies if people took
personal responsibility for their computers
There are relatively few end points on the Internet that send mail out
On 2/24/10 8:38 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500
Kris Deugau articulated:
Steven Stern wrote:
Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not
end up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...)
(: I let this conversation sit over night and this happens. :P
Thanks for the lively conversation. It seems then, that my ISP is doing
this some how. I don't have any amavisd.conf and don't have what ever
that is, installed. That's where google keeps pointing me is to change
that conf file to ch
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:00:51 +
lists articulated:
> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500
> > Kris Deugau articulated:
> >
> > > Steven Stern wrote:
> > > > Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
> > >
> > > So you can reduce malw
Steven Stern wrote:
Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not
end up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...)
It is still pointless and a waste of processing power.
Yes this exactly the way zombie bot
No Dennis, you would just know they are coming from the spammer and
not zombies. Then again, there would be far fewer zombies if people
took personal responsibility for their computers
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 2/24/10 6:52 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 02/24/2010
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500
> Kris Deugau articulated:
>
> > Steven Stern wrote:
> > > Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
> >
> > So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not
> > end up on everyone's l
I have to disagree with you completely on this issue Steve. I only use
ClamAV on my mail server and NOT to protect myself but to ensure that
I am not sending malware to unsuspecting Windows users.
Although I do agree that tagging messages as scanned and safe is
misleading. If tagged messages
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:09 -0500
Kris Deugau articulated:
> Steven Stern wrote:
> > Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
>
> So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not
> end up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...)
It is still pointless an
On 2/24/10 6:52 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 02/24/2010 08:06 AM, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
It seems that some emails couldn't be checked. Encrypted Zip files in
particular. It seems that when I try to send them from Evolution
(Ubuntu 9.10) I get this message sent to my recipients. Is there an
Steven Stern wrote:
Checking outgoing mail is pointless. Why bother?
So you can reduce malware propagation? (And as a result, maybe not end
up on everyone's local blacklist for spewing garbage...)
If I were mailing malware, I'd be sure to mark that it had been scanned,
approved, and was s
On 02/24/2010 08:06 AM, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
> It seems that some emails couldn't be checked. Encrypted Zip files in
> particular. It seems that when I try to send them from Evolution
> (Ubuntu 9.10) I get this message sent to my recipients. Is there any
> way to no show this information a
On 2/24/2010 8:06 AM, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
It seems that some emails couldn't be checked. Encrypted Zip files in
particular. It seems that when I try to send them from Evolution
(Ubuntu 9.10) I get this message sent to my recipients. Is there any
way to no show this information as it som
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:06:22 +0200
"Jason (spot) Brower" wrote:
> It seems that some emails couldn't be checked. Encrypted Zip files in
> particular. It seems that when I try to send them from Evolution
> (Ubuntu 9.10) I get this message sent to my recipients. Is there any
> way to no show thi
It seems that some emails couldn't be checked. Encrypted Zip files in
particular. It seems that when I try to send them from Evolution
(Ubuntu 9.10) I get this message sent to my recipients. Is there any
way to no show this information as it sometimes confuses and scares
people.
Best Regards,
Ja
17 matches
Mail list logo
