Re: [clamav-users] clamav DOA

Dne 18. 11. 21 v 13:09 Cody Allen napsal(a): frustrated, have spent days with a broken clamav nothing seems to work to download the db. can someone please shed some light on what is wrong and how to address the problem. running on a debian jessie appliance. at this point im dead in the water,

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Re: ClamAV® blog: Are you still attempting to download safebrowsing.cvd?

Dne čtvrtek 8. dubna 2021 16:17:24 CEST, Ralf Hildebrandt via clamav-users napsal(a): > * Vladislav Kurz via clamav-users : > > How about just making the file empty? > > I think this causes an error in clamav/clamd Then just make is as small as possible - e.g. leave onl

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: Are you still attempting to download safebrowsing.cvd?

Dne středa 7. dubna 2021 19:41:34 CEST, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users napsal(a): > > https://blog.clamav.net/2021/04/are-you-still-attempting-to-download.html > > > l> > > > > Are you still attempting to download

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: Are you still attempting to download safebrowsing.cvd?

Dne středa 7. dubna 2021 19:41:34 CEST, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users napsal(a): > > https://blog.clamav.net/2021/04/are-you-still-attempting-to-download.html > > > l> > > > > Are you still attempting to download

Re: [clamav-users] Virus Sigs not updating

Dne sobota 20. února 2021 14:34:24 CET, Charles Harbud via clamav-users napsal(a): > Hi, for the last 3 weeks Clamwin has not been able to update it's virus > signatures on my computer (Windows 2000, X32). The log says some (or all) > the mirrors are down. > May I ask, has anything changed with

Re: [clamav-users] Squid + ClamAV

Dne středa 1. dubna 2020 15:47:09 CEST, Andrea Venturoli via clamav-users napsal(a): > Hello. > > I'm trying the combination Squid + C-ICAP + SquidClamAV + ClamAV, and > I'm seeing terrible performance. > It seems there's no SquidClamAV specific mailing list and asking on > generic Squid list

Re: [clamav-users] Multiple Clam Daemons on a single system

On 05/03/2020 12:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 05.03.20 15:38, Ashish Poddar via clamav-users wrote: >> We have a situation where we run a clamav daemon to scan files on a >> system. > > how? > >> However, in the process, we only use about 10% CPU in the system. We >> would >> naturally

Re: [clamav-users] clamav-unofficial-sigs download script updated

On 31/01/2020 15:06, Michael Orlitzky via clamav-users wrote: > On 1/31/20 2:47 AM, Steve Basford wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> eXtremeSHOK.com's clamav-unofficial-sigs download script has been >> updated: >> >> https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs >> >> Change Log >> >> Version 7.0.1

Re: [clamav-users] Continuous increase of startup time (is daily.cld broken?)

On 17/10/2019 17:44, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > Hello again, > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Vladislav Kurz via clamav-users wrote: > >> Is there anything blocking this patch from being accepted ? > > As far as I know, only the (significant) pressures and (AFAI

Re: [clamav-users] Continuous increase of startup time (is daily.cld broken?)

On 17/10/2019 16:51, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Vladislav Kurz via clamav-users wrote: > >> So the question is - what would be easier to code? >> - reloading in background thread >> - reloading limited to new fi

Re: [clamav-users] Continuous increase of startup time (is daily.cld broken?)

On 17/10/2019 15:40, Markus Kolb via clamav-users wrote: > Am 07.10.2019 08:57, schrieb Sergey: >> On Friday 13 September 2019, Markus Kolb via clamav-users wrote: >> >>> I've opened an enhacement bug for this: >>> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12389 >> >> Thanks. But I have one more

Re: [clamav-users] Continuous increase of startup time (is daily.cld broken?)

On 07/10/2019 08:57, Sergey wrote: > On Friday 13 September 2019, Markus Kolb via clamav-users wrote: > >> I've opened an enhacement bug for this: >> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12389 > > Thanks. But I have one more question. Do I understand correctly > that when loading