This looks great, I'm certainly willing to edit/audit/mentor some of the more
hands on portions.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2013, at 8:01 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Sebastien,
Absolutely love it!
jessica.tomec...@gmail.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 12:18 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Networking Question
Hi Mike, you can drop me an email directly if you want to talk about
Hi Mike, you can drop me an email directly if you want to talk about advanced
networking features.
The simple answer is that each isolated(default)NAT network created grabs a
VLAN from the guest VLAN pool.
You can have many VM under a domain sharing an isolated network.
Sent from my iPhone
Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:24 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: HA question
I could get one started.
I've saved this thread, and I'll try to get some stuff
I guess this would have to be tested on other hypervisors as well.
Unfortunately I get a lot of XS answers, and very few others.
Thanks for the tip Clayton I'll add this to the wiki section once it's up.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Clayton Weise cwe...@iswest.net wrote:
Just to clarify as our community is quite large now, we are purely discussing
code support in the form of patches, correct?
Just to make sure people don't anticipate operations support for potentially 4
simultaneous versions. Also that's a lot of docs and wiki, do we have a plan on
how we are
I favor adding a new volume and using LVM in the guest to make it appear as a
single data source for the end user.
Same with windows and merged drives, or multi-backed folders.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi,
Can
Congrats!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats Noa
Ahmad
On Feb 27, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
well done
On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
This is turning out to be a great discussion to have. Now I get that CloudStack
HA is purely handled by the management/orchestration engine and only if VM is
tagged(which I knew). But what is good to find out is that it does not involve
underlying hypervisor specific HA modules(except perhaps
know
On 28/02/13 12:16 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
This is turning out to be a great discussion to have. Now I get that
CloudStack HA is purely handled by the management/orchestration engine
and only if VM is tagged(which I knew). But what is good to find out
I think having them so far apart (geographically) makes it ok.
I would love to be a part of the silicon valley one. And I think there is a
large part of the community that feels left out if we only hold official events
in NA.
Based on social rumblings, and IDCs interesting figures, I think
Your doing such a good job, I might just have to stop reading the list and wait
for your weeklies!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all,
Weekly news draft is up:
I'm really behind on what's going on here. What is the purpose behind the
Selenium and Python UI automation?
This seems similar to the .net/IronPython work I was doing and the various
Python API Wrappers.
Could you give me some more background, or perhaps so links with details as to
the scope
As a dual iOS/Android user I think this is a great idea. Heck, even to just
have a nice monitoring tool/performance app would be great.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 15, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
On 16/02/13 9:08 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us
Congrats!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Congratulations, Likitha.
-min
On 2/13/13 9:22 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Congrats Likitha
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley
Thats awesome! And you guys beat me to market on both the CloudStack books I'm
working in :).
I wish I could read Japanese.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Kimihiko Kitase kkit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Japan CloudStack User Group member and more people from CloudStack
Congrats!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:06 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
All,
Thank you very much. I am looking forward to further contributing and
helping the project.
Thanks,
-John
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.com
Well with 1 NIC several other compliance issues arise especially for us PCI
type folk.
I have built CS into a compliant DC and had few issues, maximizing the
flexibility of network types and routing, pretty much anything can be done. My
CS build lived behind 3 layers of firewalls.
Perhaps
Awesome! Kick-ass!
Enjoy!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all,
I'll be offline from Monday to Wednesday, in transit to Australia.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
This was a good read, I think the simpler vApp method makes sense for an
infrastructure tool. And could be a great opportunity to rework projects into a
more useful system.
I would not want to make the blueprints too complex, but my main issue with
vApp methodology is how a vApp is completely
I remember this discussion.
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
YAY.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.comwrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to
I set up 7-9 JIRA folders, discussion, version, etc folders. Basically I sort
my email I Dev based on the awesome [tags] in all the subject lines, and then a
folder for what's left over.
It keeps it very organized. I also have it set the red flag if any of these
emails have my name/email in
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:30 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:07:10PM +0530, Murali Reddy wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a
donation from Citrix to support network services
I believe it's '-1' in the UI for unlimited.
I agree with making defaults unlimited.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Chris Sears chris.x.se...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com
wrote:
Can anyone suggest that
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
+1!
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack
to stopped) and is available
when the vm is in destroyed state.
But we show actions for only one of them in the UI actions. We should have
one for restoreVirtualMachine api as well.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 05-Jan-2013, at 10:35 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote:
We discussed this, but RestoreVM
We discussed this, but RestoreVM is for resurrecting a VM in status 'Destroyed'
before its expunged.
Trevor wants to re-image an existing VM. You could also look it at snapshot
rollback. Being able to restore a VM to a previous state.
Most importantly Trevor needs a solution that does not
Congrats Joe!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Ahmad Emneina ahmad.emne...@citrix.com wrote:
Awesome news, congrats Joe!
Ahmad
On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Well Done Joe,
-sebastien
On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Animesh
While I'm certainly not new, I'll add this; DB schema charts are always
helpfully especially when we modify the schema every release :). Also a class
map(interaction chart) would be nice, however I know that's a near impossible
task :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 24, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Mike
Hmm, for me linked clones cause slow downs with aggressive Pre/post
deduplication.
I agree that it should be a cluster switch. Perhaps housed in a service
offering and using the tagging system?
But yes, any less granular then a cluster and we could run into issues for
being too restrictive.
Lol, BASH is so ugly :).
But yeah it's doing the same thing if I remove the cutting and suffixing.
(which is no longer needed)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) kel...@bbits.ca
This is a prime example where guest scripts make sense for automating the
interface alias creation. I still think I'm missing something however, does
this include a new fetch IP API?
Also the 30 IP limit seems out of place, when I can go in right now and give
any guest VM 256+ interface
endpoint on a basic network.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
This is a prime example where guest scripts make sense for automating the
interface alias creation. I still think I'm missing something however, does
this include a new fetch
a PKCS#11 format would probably be best.
John
On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca
wrote:
This is a prime example where guest scripts make sense for automating the
interface alias creation. I still think I'm missing something however, does
this include a new
Just to be clear, this feature is to simply track multiple IPs in the ui/db
correct?
There is no mechanism to prevent an existing tenant from creating up aliases on
their subnet. So currently users can manually setup all the IPs they want in
guest VMs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2012, at
After the arp issues I had with the current system vm(VR) when behind an RHEL
FW using arp for IP clustering, having the option of a centos VR would be great.
Mixed Linux distro environments can sometimes have unforeseen consequences. And
if a shop is totally RHEL, then forcing them to use non
Thanks,
I'll go through this today and post to the wiki.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Giles Sirett giles.sir...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi all
Sorry, I've been meaning to post this list here since getting back from LV.
This was a set of feature requests that we worked up
I will be in and out of the meeting. I am on transit at that time, so I'm a
slave to train reception.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:09 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
I can run it tomorrow
On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net
wrote:
A
for Citrix but was VP of Marketing for Vyatta. I did
both contacts via LinkedIn.
I do think LinkedIn will probably be ignored because it's a great marketing
spam tool.
We should try direct email.
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Thursday
+1 agreed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2012, at 9:23 AM, sebastien run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A few of us have been looking at translation of the documentation using
transifex.
To automate the pushing and pulling of source files and translations from our
source code to the
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I guess we can try creating alternative system offering :)
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:17 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System VM
I'm very interested in this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro?
built/working on Debian 6.0
http://virtualisationandmanagement.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/debian-on-hyper-v-with-4-vcpu-support-and-syntetic-network/
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
I'm very interested in this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510257#comment-13510257
]
Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
---
Sorry, don't get me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510265#comment-13510265
]
Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
---
I also failed
I was unaware of the transifex tool.
I can switch to .slice, can you provide me an example .ent file?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:29 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't transifex client create the tx config file automatically based on the
op/pot files
I had a similar issue with KVM and CS on 3.0.2. Turns out the Debian squeeze
routers/systemVMs were incompatible with the vIP HA method I was using
upstream(ARP based HA-IPs). It's worth running tests against any physical or
custom virtual routing equipment you might have in the network path.
I too am curious to know the answer on this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Clayton Weise cwe...@iswest.net wrote:
When importing volumes, what is the process that actually occurs? I'm
assuming the SSVM downloads the volume to a temporary place on secondary
storage, then
I was under the assumption the meeting was at 10am PST
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all,
Looks like we're without a quorum for the weekly meeting. I checked in
#cloudstack-meeting at 17:00 UTC and seemed to be the only person
This is awesome guys, everyone put in a lot of hard work on this release.
Congrats!
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Just pushed out the 4.0.0-incubating announcement and posted it to the
Apache blog:
A python agent is something I would really like. And also is a project I might
actually be able to work on(Python is my primary language).
Let me know when you get this going and I will do what I can to assist.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com
Awesome, it's a shame it only shows the name of the form submitter, and not all
speakers,
That should be rectified, as there are people who will be looking for speakers.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Good news, everybody!
Have you tried using a redundant virtual router?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Prasanna Santhanam prasanna.santha...@citrix.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 03:49:07AM -0400, guang wu wrote:
hi,everyone:
i 'm very interest in cloudstack,but now i have a trouble when i
Thanks Rohit, this is an awesome fix, and will help in the setup of complex
installs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 22, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi kdamage, I did not see this thread, just saw the bug ticket and went ahead
and fixed this in master:
Hi,
Thanks for the link. I resolved the issue, it was related to a bug I submitted
on cloud-setup-databases and grabbing the wrong NIC.
Basically the management server was listening on the wrong IP.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 19, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
That's a far more elegant way then I tried, which was creating tagged
interfaces within guests.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:54 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
This sounds like it can be modeled as multiple physical networks? That is,
each outer vlan
Pretty scary FUD below from that article:
Don’t consider CloudStack. It will soon die. True, it is getting some traction
in the enterprise because Citrix is pushing it, using its enterprise sales
muscle–plus it has a pretty UI. But the truth is that OpenStack has already
surpassed CloudStack
+1
I agree completely
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2012, at 10:11 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks:
So a couple of comments.
I appreciate the level of passion seen in this thread - it tells me
that people love CloudStack. That said, open source projects competing
among
Any updates on the planet aggregator?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Please let us know where you're blogging from and we'll add you to our
planet!
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
I started one called database resource guide I think on the wiki.
Here is the link to the old wiki. It's far from done, and having some input
would be great, I have been championing the need for this document for over 6
months now.
What build was the finalizeStart error resolved in... I have a 323 build
exhibiting this same behaviour.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 7, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the 4.0 'task' branch? I was looking at your libvirtd log and
it resembles a recently
an error in my devcloud.cfg file.
he storage mount point are missing a :
it should be url: nfs://10.0.2.15:/opt/storage/secondary
Now on to another problem which I'll send a new message :) .
James
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
Hi please
Haha,
So it was the local storage issue tripping you up.
Hope it's working now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, James Martin jmar...@basho.com wrote:
I think I fixed one problem but solved another.. I had to add
{
name:system.vm.use.local.storage,
Just winging it here but for scope interface errors check that your pools are
not completely allocated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, James Martin jmar...@basho.com wrote:
I think I fixed one problem but solved another.. I had to add
{
, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
Just winging it here but for scope interface errors check that your pools
are not completely allocated.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, James Martin jmar...@basho.com wrote:
I think I fixed one problem
Seems odd but you could be short IPs for the POD pool.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
The database check the IP allocation and network pools alongside the storage
pool
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:56 AM, James
, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
The database check the IP allocation and network pools alongside the storage
pool
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:56 AM, James Martin jmar...@basho.com wrote:
Primary storage and Secondary storage are good according
,
name: PS0
} ]
}
],
gateway: 10.0.2.2
}
],
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
Seems odd but you
running in virtual box.
James
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
Your network is completely flat. Make sure you only have 1 interface active
on your physical box, or your network pathing will be screwed.
POD = mgmt network
GUEST = vm network
Hi please try this
Disable local storage, and either specify your local drive as a shared mount
point, or use NFS to mount to yourself.
Thanks
Local storage is not of the correct type to launch system vm, most likely cause
being miss-reporting as 99% full/alert state.
Sent from my iPhone
On
If your vnets are tied to the correct bridges/interfaces for all VMs involved,
then my money is on ARP/firewall.
Move all the VMs onto a single host, including and VRs.
Then attempt basic network troubleshooting, starting from host to perimeter
router, followed by guest to VR (if applicable)
Also remember that if your VR is the default GW, the you should enable icmp(-1)
on the FW if you using ping to troubleshoot network connectivity.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Nguyễn Đình Việt viet...@viettel.com.vn wrote:
Hi guy,
This is result of 'ip route show'
I would like to get together with all the other Architects, and OPs agents, and
start to build some established best practices for builds.
A way of engaging users in the process of using established convention in
production builds, and providing guidelines to assist new users in preferred
and
I really dig the minimalist navigation pane in the demo, but the 3D is kinda
odd.
Nice soft black.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 08/22/2012 07:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Sonny,
The 3-D effect is actually kind of jarring.
We are already using an up tables solution I thought: contrackt
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Matthew Patton mpat...@inforelay.com wrote:
Please let's not reinvent the wheel. See pfsense, vrrp/carp, and pfsync.
A redundant iptables solution doesn't spring to mind but it
I've seen cloudVirBr0 before in build tests. I know all network bridges are
created from one of the shell scripts that is called by one of the networking
gurus.
When you specify a VLAN it's creates a bridge called cloudVirBr + vlanID.
Since yours is tagged VLAN 0, my guess is it tried to
Also run brctl show from the hypervisor and note if there is an interface
called eth{x}.0 attached to the bridge. If so, then check cat
/proc/net/vlan/config and cat /proc/net/vlan/eth{x}.0, where x=interface
number.
I'm curious how the system is interpreting the bridge.
Sent from my iPhone
Just to add, a tagged interface needs no configuration to work.
Here is a centos example.
Create bridge:
DEVICE=Br0
TYPE=Bridge
Ifup Br0
now tag eth0:
vconfig add eth0 1
add tag to bridge:
brctl addif Br0 eth.1
At this point in theory traffic over Br0 should be tagged VLAN 1 and route out
Read that IBM article you referenced, it made a lot of things clear to me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Matthew Patton mpat...@inforelay.com wrote:
'cloudVirBr' is hard-coded in
/usr/lib[64]/cloud/agent/scripts/vm/network/vnet/modifyvlan.sh in function
addVlan().
+1 for 2FA.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Clayton Weise cwe...@iswest.net wrote:
Another reason for 2FA: regulatory compliance. HIPAA requires 2FA for
certain things. There are ways around it with the regulation, but having it
makes the HIPAA audit process much easier.
/log/messages at all?
Does this link help:
http://www.serveradminblog.com/2011/02/neighbour-table-overflow-sysctl-conf
-tunning/
On 8/9/12 8:54 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote:
Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove
out. default is os default
Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove out.
default is os default centos 6.2.
All the IPs share the same MAC and the gateway should not be moving.
Again, no issues from a centos guest using it directly as a gateway. Issues
only when the VR is using it as a
Well I for one am going to need to find or make an RPM building system, as our
company likes clean production servers without 'from source' builds, so the
Sys-Admins can cleanly manage the farm.
I do understand the decision to remove the libvirt code, however I too hope we
can put together
I get it now too.
Thanks for the clarification
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:17 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Got it, my bad…I saw the previous comments about convenience builds but
didn't' fully gather the ramifications.
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Kevin Kluge
I have found success with using a combo of templates/snapshots and BackupPC on
the guests.
This way in a worse case scenario I can roll out a template or even ISO install
and re-image the guest from BackupPC is snapshots fail or the original VM
corrupts.
In-fact having at least one backup
By Will it be good idea to move that VMs out of CloudStack do you mean onto
separate infrastructure? As in a non-managed hypervisor, or bare-metal?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:20 AM, d...@soleks.com wrote:
Hi all,
System VMs - SSVM and CPVM- both are critical components for
I think I see your point, however would that not pose a large increase in
logistics for huge multi-zone deployments?
What if it were an optional feature. One could choose to abstract the system
VMs from the cloud, but was not forced to?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM,
Have we found out whether we can get a custom ruleset for an apache planet site?
If not I suggest we go ahead and host with jlkinsel.
It's more important to get this working then worry too much about the method.
We can always redirect the content later.
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
90 matches
Mail list logo
