On 3/22/23 09:21, Rob van der Heij wrote:
.. | y: if locate -80 | x: if chop -80 | x: | y: | ...
Why -80 ? That would make the second record limited to 80 rather than
the first, as I believe Glenn wants.
.. | y: if locate 81 | x: if chop 80 | x: | y: | ...
I like the second IF. Never
On 3/18/23 14:02, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
... | split 80 before not 00-ff | ...
Hehe! So I forgot to check for an impossible character range in
combination with NOT.
If we are speaking two records, wouldn't SPEC be able to do what you want?
On 3/13/23 23:41, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
I've got a bunch of lists where each list *precedes* the container I
want to match it up with--similar to link-edit steps in JCLIN, where the
name of the load module comes
On 3/14/23 16:05, Rob van der Heij wrote:
The repeating "range" doesn't really do that, but I just checked that
strip x0d 1 will take one from either or both sides of the record.
You're right. It gives an error because it supports only ranges
relative to the beginning of the record and
On 3/14/23 00:44, Donald Russell wrote:
If you know the data has crlf or lfcr or just lf but never just cr then
… deblock 0a | strip both 0d | …
A more reliable way to remove just one cr from either end might be
something like
change (1 -1) x0d //
On 12/6/22 23:57, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Yep, that's CMS release storage,
So PARSEM runs key zero so that it can CMMSSTOR RELEASE,TYPE=BALR.
Shouldn't that be fixed so that the application cannot walk all over CMS?
:soapbox.
Running key zero "for performance reasons" was never in my book; in
I wish I had a penny for each time PIPE gets blamed for programs called
from it falling over.
Are those messages from your REXX code, or what? Looks like some kind
of trace to me.
If not of your doing, I'd find out what the component code IAD is and
look for a call to it.
You might also
On 11/28/22 11:10, Kris Buelens wrote:
I repeat that #1 (or in France £1) is a counter, so no spaces by
definition.
This is no longer the case.
Counters can now contain non-numeric strings as well as proper numbers.
Perhaps #1 should be called a variable, just as Alain does.
The initial
On 11/28/22 10:07, Alain Benvéniste wrote:
Yes John ^ is the good character.
There is something i still don’t understand :
If i code
If £1==a
and a is equal to b3339
b for blank, the if is not honored
If I use a
If space(£1)==space(a) it works.
It could mean that when i do a set £1:=a the blank
On 11/27/22 13:51, a.benveni...@free.fr wrote:
Sorry John to come back but,
There is no /== operator in specs.
For me, ^== works as the not exactly equal operator because my terminal
emulator maps ^ to not; perhaps it works for you too. Otherwise you
need to find the not character on your
On 11/27/22 12:39, a.benveni...@free.fr wrote:
" if (£1/=a) then",
The numerically not equal operator converts both arguments to numbers
and then performs a numeric compare.
Your compare of 6010A fails because the digit A is not decimal. (Specs
has no facility to compare hexadecimal.)
a",
" set £2:=b",
" set £3:=c",
" set £4:=1",
" set £5+=1",
" endif",
" 1-* 1",
" print £4 picture 9 nextword",
" print £5 picture 9 next",
"!01:"
De : CMS/TSO Pipelines Discu
On 11/26/22 13:15, Alain Benvéniste wrote:
So there no syntax to assign characters to a variable to test it through a if ?
Sure there is:
if (#56 -= 1) then ...
(decrement counter 56 and test for 0 or nonzero.)
Perhaps it would be easier if you set your terminal/emulator to the US
code
! is the vertical bar (|) on most European terminals. It would have
been nice to know the actual error message.
On 11/26/22 12:14, Kris Buelens wrote:
I don't understand what these
are supposed to do
On 8/24/22 16:32, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) wrote:
16MB? 24bit addressing related somehow, is it?
Not likely, even though REXX is before XA, but MVCL are restricted to
16M objects.
On 8/13/22 01:17, Donald Russell wrote:
The question mark, though not my first choice, is well documented to mean
“pipe”. There’s nothing ambiguous or questionable about it.
REXX produces a question mark when the subcommand environment is
provided as a PSW rather than a string.
CMS
Apart from what else can be said, your program is interpreted as EXEC2,
not REXX. It lacks the leading comment to identify it as such.
On 8/10/22 17:30, Steve Thompson wrote:
Hi. I'm re-sending this because of somehow getting unsubscribed And
issuing commands to change some default
, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
On 6/11/2022 9:01 AM, John P. Hartmann wrote:
Stop using PREFACE/APPEND if you wish to retain your sanity.
I have to wrap this in *something* that will let the rest of the
pipeline run. APPEND might be hard to predict when you want something
to stop at (rather than
/**/
'commit 0'
'callpipe rexxvars nomsg 233|*:'
'short'
exit 0
On 6/13/22 21:54, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
On 6/11/2022 9:01 AM, John P. Hartmann wrote:
Stop using PREFACE/APPEND if you wish to retain your sanity.
I have to wrap this in *something* that will let the rest of the
pipeline
Stop using PREFACE/APPEND if you wish to retain your sanity.
On 6/10/22 02:25, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 14:55:21 +0200, John wrote:
The callpipe implied in PREFACE does the commit on you (trace told me),
so REXXVARS starts on commit level 0, does not commit to 0, and
You must specify ALLMASTERS to get all matching master records.
On 6/6/22 23:57, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
I see
that even with BEFORE I never get any duplicates out:
pipe literal x1 x2 x3 x4|split|a:lookup autoadd before 1 count
/a: /a:|cons /a: /a:|cons
So which is the master and which is the detail?
On 6/6/22 21:32, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
PIPE ... | lookup autoadd w3 w2 ...
FPLLUP761E Different key fields not allowed with AUTOADD
Why not? It wasn't hard to write the pipeline to add the records to the
reference myself, but in the
The callpipe implied in PREFACE does the commit on you (trace told me),
so REXXVARS starts on commit level 0, does not commit to 0, and returns
with code 233, as it should, but at that time it is too late for the
dispatcher to pull the brake.
Somewhere in the early 1980s, we got multistream
They should be in a VM archive on github, but as I can no longer access
github, you'll have to do some guessing as to where. Is there a CMSLIB
project?
On 4/24/22 16:48, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, fellow pipers.
The document "John's Goodies Writing CMS Pipelines stages in C" mentions
several
Select the range you wish to test | grep and you have the matching string.
However, I have never tested grep for interoperability with POSIX grep.
On 1/23/22 16:00, Jack Woehr wrote:
On 1/23/22 2:52 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
PIPSYSF in the main pipeline, but I don't think grep c.s. are the
For the record,
What is left in PIPSYSF is not of product quality, for one reason or
another.
I'm afraid you are sunk.
Anything else is just a toy. None have been validated against the
pipelines regression reference. None performs or scales.
If your withdrawal is too painful, there is the z/PDT.
On 1/19/22 18:37, Eloy Rodríguez Barrio wrote:
Our management has decided to
You would want a stage that connects to the timezone (or whatever)
service and then writes a record when the event occurs. STARxxx does
this for most system services. I'd suggest that be the paradigm.
On 12/2/21 16:27, David Boyes wrote:
There's nothing today, and it isn't easy if it
Presuming I am part of the group:
The reason that what is now PIPSYSF did not get rolled into the various
levels of CMS/TSO pipelines is that the remaining function is not always
working as you want. Or perhaps is (ghasp) buggy.
Do you really want IBM to spend the effort to document
Would the pipelines source code do as an example?
Look for FPLxxx ASSEMBLE in the CMS source.
Cheers,
j.
On 6/13/21 19:59, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, fellow plumbers.
I am trying to teach myself PL/j so I can write stages in assembler. I
am using Rob v.d. Heij's SHARE presentation
Please trace IUCV to see the interrupt parameter and message number.
Also check for message in parameter list.
The target class is supposed to identify the data; without that, STARMSG
*VMEVENT is useless. Perhaps STARMSG could/should be enhanced to
write the IPARML in front of the data (or
I also have a PUTFILES REXX, which does something entirely different.
Perhaps Kris knows that Berry uses Kris' particular version. Otherwise
all of this is more or less idle speculation.
On 3/3/21 16:30, Kris Buelens wrote:
My very first PUTFILES was indeed simple: an ADDPIPE for each fileid
I didn't say that, but as long as Berry understands, all is fine.
On 3/3/21 14:07, Rob van der Heij wrote:
As John points out, when you're
writing to SFS
Use DISKSLOW if you know you are going to write a single line per
invocation.
The reason could be anything; Vblockv is totally undocumented. Use >SFS
to get documented error and reason codes.
I don't know what your PUTFILES does, so I cannot answer your final
question.
On 3/3/21 12:43,
In general, pipes are forgiving and accepts a wider gamut of options
than the documentation specifies.
The documentation is written to be comprehensible and flowing (in
authors' argot), if it were to show all possible combinations of options
and what not, it would, certainly in the case of
Be sure to retain the output at the end:
lookup MASTER DETAIL.
There is only one test case for each of CEILING/FLOOR. E.g.,
lookup floor 1
I must have been busy at the time in 2003.
On 1/29/21 13:53, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 13:45, Alain Benvéniste wrote:
There is something wrong here. LOOR is not a valid range, so F should
not be recognised as a abbreviation of FIELD, but it certainly looks
like that is what is happening.
On 1/29/21 12:35, Ronald van der Laan wrote:
Alain,
I guess that with the second field definition, the F from FLOOR is
CMS pipelines also knows how to handle the case where the end of file
marker is truncated to one byte in the last card.
On 1/17/21 15:08, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 14:48, Kris Buelens wrote:
Probably there still is a chance that DEBLOCK CMS will complain when the
last
On 12/1/20 16:22, David Boyes wrote:
SysV streams
Ritchie's sewers has a lot more in common with CMS pipes than does Unix
pipe()s.
You can have pipeline segments waiting for records, but they cannot wait
for connexions (other than things like TCPLISTEN, but that is a
different kind of connexion).
Two general approaches:
1. If you know what data you will use to distribute the records among
the processing pipeline
Problem is all those AMODE24 programs that go poking in them FSTs.
On 9/23/20 04:14, Ray Mansell wrote:
Ah, one of those little projects I never got to before retiring. I still
have all my notes somewhere...
Ray
On 9/22/2020 17:14, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
Only so useful, though, unless
EDF came as an add-on to VM/370 release 6 in 1979. Along with FBA
support if memory serves.
Alan is not doing justice to the designers. Being copy-on-write, it was
the first CMS file system that had no leakage of disk blocks on crashes
or power outages. CDF had the choice of trashed files or
On 9/11/20 14:07, John P. Hartmann wrote:
There is no test case of the placement option with v2c.
Turns out there was a single one and it had the wrong result.
The interaction with STRIP also needed a loving hand.
On 9/11/20 01:00, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
Uh-oh. I must never have tried THIS before:
pipe literal 123| specs 1-* v2c 1.3 right | cons
1
That's just wrong.
¬R
This is a bug that no-one has complained about before.
The correct output is "123". That is, the placement has
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/pipeline.pdf
On 9/9/20 11:47, Lionel Dyck wrote:
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to learn that PIPES in BPW is out of date.
It's the best I have available at this point. The BPW pub isn't that useful
for the most part so I'm getting by with pipe help and trial
Please refer to http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/ in particular
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/tsohelp.html
On 9/9/20 12:23, Lionel Dyck wrote:
Sadly PIPE AHELP results in this:
1 +++ nolib=readdir()
IRX0043I Error running AHELP, line 1: Routine not found
IRX0043I Error running AHELP, line
It calls a pipeline to read and deblock at line ends on the way in. And
similarly on the way out. I don't think you will find that documented
anywhere.
On 9/9/20 07:09, Kris Buelens wrote:
I never checked what.it did with BFS files
LISTPDS will give youo a list of members. Feed that to MEMBERS.
On 9/9/20 10:08, Lionel Dyck wrote:
Is there a way with PIPE MEMBERS to have it process all members?
I've tried variations of these without success:
'pipe members test.pdse member * | stem x.'
'pipe listispf test.pdse | chop 8 |
On 8/21/20 15:41, Alan Altmark wrote:
It certainly obviates any concern about calling entry points. New entry
points can simply be added to DMSNAM.
As long as a module has the load map in it, entry points can always be
called by NUCXLOADing the module and compute the address of the entry
On 8/21/20 13:55, Alan Altmark wrote:
NAMEFIND (DMSNAM) is where all the smarts are for processing a NAMES file,
and that's where they need to stay, IMO. Mechanically, NAMEFIND is a
MODULE, not kernel-resident, and that makes it impossible to have other
commands call its entry points.
Are you
First of all, his stage name was El Bozo. An second you should hear
Chick Corea's reading on "My Spanish Heart".
On 8/20/20 19:39, David Boyes wrote:
On 8/20/20, 12:23 PM, "CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List on behalf of Alan Altmark"
wrote:
And I reject the "cruft" reference. The
Assuming you know TSO and basic CMS, the CMS library pipelines user's
guide contains the information you require.
You can find an older version of that book at
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/pipeline.pdf
On 4/18/20 13:38, Lionel Dyck wrote:
Is there a good presentation, handout,
Dave, assuming that the last hyphen within the quotes is the operative
delimiter, this works with your sample:
substr fs - f-1 of fs " f2
As for pattern, I think this is an example of what you are asking:
(':kwd' rem):out/* Stage name
Thus, your pattern could
In the Author's Edition on Marist, please refer to p. 708 (physical 736)
for the "Output Placement" track.
You will see the Member as the penultimate choice in the first selection.
I'd be rather surprised if the 7.x doc hasn't got it.
On 1/22/20 18:27, David Boyes wrote:
I’m not trying to
pipe spec 1 m abc
PIPQUA1395E Unqualified member name: abc.
So you should be able to specify the member name as the output, but you
must specify the keyword, "Member".
On 1/22/20 16:14, David Boyes wrote:
I have an application that defines a data structure using the STRUCTURE stage.
I can
It has been there for quite some years. Quietly. You will not find any
description anywhere.
On 11/5/19 20:16, René Jansen wrote:
I noticed that pipe q source puts an answer in the pipeline, but no message if
there is no stream connected. I cannot find the ‘source’ option in the 6.4
Surely
locate 1.5 /a_b c/
does what you want and it won't tax you to learn anything new.
On 8/23/19 00:38, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
On 2019-08-22 12:03 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Wouldn't PICK 1+ == /abc/ do what you ask for?
If I learned (and remembered) newfangled syntaxes like
I wrote a TFTP server for MVS in 1991 or thereabouts. I'll see what I
can find tomorrow. No promises, but some hope.
On 8/9/19 20:56, Dave Jones wrote:
Does anyone happen to have a pipeline stage that implements the TFTP
protocol that they would be willing to share? I thought I'd ask here
Pass.
17 Dec 1997 +++ VERIFY NOT.
Is all I can find. No doubt to emulate REXX verify( , 'match').
No mention in PIPELINE NEWS, so I suppose I decided it did not fly and
left it at that. At the time I was, to say the least, busy elsewhere.
Verify itself is from June 1994, as Finn has
But suppose the record gets deleted by someone else? There really is no
answer here. Even if you do SAVE/RESTORE to isolate changes to scope
Bottom line: since cms 5.5, you can have only one XEDIT session within
a virtual machine. (I could before, but the new storage management
broke
x Language Association?
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 22 Mar 2019, at 12:54, John P. Hartmann wrote:
How can you say that when it has not passed the pipelines regression test?
Can you move at least pipelines REXX filters between VM and your workstation
without change?
On 3/22/19 17:49, René Ja
How can you say that when it has not passed the pipelines regression test?
Can you move at least pipelines REXX filters between VM and your
workstation without change?
On 3/22/19 17:49, René Jansen wrote:
The implementation (by Ed Tomlinson) follows VM and is reasonably complete.
i) No.
ii) Waters: The Machine.
On 3/22/19 11:50, amphitr...@ok.de wrote:
The only hint I found about PC-Pipe's existence is a 10 years old
append announcing an update of PC-Pipes, alas today the link is dead.
Questions:
i) is there a result from the efforts to migrate Pipelines to the
PC
I was just looking at this since my memory is rusty, if not gone.
Rob will have to correct this with module and nucleus extension names
for z/VM 6.4 and on. If you are impatient, NUCXMAP will get you the
name of the main module nucelus extension; the module name is likely
DMSPIPE.
The check is
This also works:
specs select 0 select 1 1-* 1
You can even
specs select 2 select 0 select 1 1-* 1
But as I said earlier, SYNCHRONISE is the way to pace streams without tears.
On 2/27/19 00:28, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
To pair up the records, I had to include
something from the primary in
This is correct.
"To perform a cycle, spec issues the items in the specification list
from left to right. At the
beginning of a cycle, spec synchronises the input streams it uses; that
is, it peeks at all
input streams it uses before issuing any specification items. This
ensures that a record is
This is in fact a reference to uninitialised storage. You'd have got an
addressing exception if you had enabled the storage checks (MSG 2048).
On 2/27/19 02:16, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
specs read select 1 1-* 1
Then I decided it would probably consume two records on the primary
instead
OK, it is/was Friday.
Stacker select x'42' should also be observed in case someone brought a
real deck of cards to a real card reader. And remembered how to punch
and ID card.
And Michael, as of z/VM 6.4 you are allowed to simply |substr 2-*|
rather than starting all of SPEC. Sort of like
Nocando. Manifest constants are numbers, not strings.
On 1/1/19 20:42, Donald Russell wrote:
pipe strliteral xc3 | specs q byte print bitand(x,bit7) u2x | cons
Forgive my bluntness, but sometimes it helps to read the manual.
The pipeline option NOSTOPERROR is the default; you need it only to
override a global option. It controls what happens after a stage
terminates with an error.
The article on COMMAND is equally clear that you need to define the
It has always been sin
On 12/17/18 21:20, Michael Harding wrote:
The last I knew, double-quotes were the only acceptable delineator for this
construct but that may have changed.
Use CHOP 30|COPY|SPLIT|WILDCARD and JUXTAPOSE to prefix the remainder of
the record by each word. It should be pretty easy to adapt WILDCARD to
serach for the keyword, as you suggest. You'll have to do a bit of
contortion to get the topology just right.
I'm sure Rob can elaborate and also get
As of z/VM 6.4, everyone can stuff a string into a counter. There are
tons of examples in the chapter "specs reference".
On 08/08/2018 10:40 AM, van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote:
Hi All,
I have a pipeline where I want to assign a variable during processing of the
records. As long as that is a
Ah, Mike.
Glenn wants to avoid a contorted pipeline topology, so what he is doing
is passing the output from FANIN to the *secondary* output of NOT, which
he can then later FANIN where he wants it.
Chances are that this can be accomplished much more easily with IF.
On 04/14/2018 07:57 AM,
Whether the OP really needs to include asynchronous messages from a
service machine or not in the command output, this is a valid scenario
that should be addressed in general and examples in the relevant book;
think, e.g., DIRMAINT.
GET set a variable; it does not write to the console.
This gripe is so obvious, but in future, could you please specify what
you expect and what you achieved. Thank you.
On 12/21/2017 06:00 PM, Gentry, Steve wrote:
I'm not understanding something.
Why does this work: GLOBALV SELECT SQL/DS
This works for me:
Signal on novalue
numeric digits 12
Address COMMAND
'PIPE (end \ name T)',
'\literal x',
'|literal abc',
'|l:locate /*/',
'|g: gate',
'|hole',
'\l:',
'|buffer',
'|g:',
'|cons'
Exit RC
On 12/08/2017 11:36 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Sorry, I missed
Alan, you are describing the ultimate aim for "the Plumbers' Workbench".
A worktop where you can drag and drop stages and connect them. The
pipeline end (the mere programming) is in place and is called "encoded
pipeline".
Alas, the gui seems to be done by a lot of other players, none of which
I think I should use the 407.
I'd first have a copy of the record where I'd xlate all numbers to, say,
0 and all letters so, say, a. I'd select the records by locate /0a/ and
then in the 407 for those records i'd #0=pos("0a", record(1, 100)) and
write the two parts of the record with an
pick w1 ==/BUILD/ and w2 ==/ON/
On 10/25/2017 01:56 AM, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
pick w1 ==/BUILD/ | pick w2 ==/ON/
First of all, you need to learn about CMSIUCV.
Then perhaps check the return codes? I expect your hndiucv was
rejected, because otherwise you just lost access to your SFS files.
Use TRACE EXT to see IUCV interrupts.
If this isn't a learning exercise, I suggest you let us know what you
are
, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Sunday, 08/27/2017 at 07:05 GMT, "John P. Hartmann"
<jphartm...@gmail.com> wrote:
If fd means filedescriptor, try
pipe ahelp filedescriptor
Since it's not in the list of supported states (pipe help), I have to be
careful calling them out. But, yes, fd
If fd means filedescriptor, try
pipe ahelp filedescriptor
On 08/27/2017 07:40 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
USS is very much separate from MVS.
CSL = Callable Services (Language). Google, man, google. Same goes for the
Pipe storage stage.
There are no stages I'm aware of that connect to an
I have already sent my apologies to Dave.
I checked my facts and decided that things were quite alive, but forgot
to delete the offending sentence before I sent my append.
On 08/27/2017 03:55 PM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
We've received a couple of notes from a mention on this e-mail
list
Since Alan mentions other C implementations for CMS, I shall take the
liberty of mentioning
https://github.com/jphartmann/cmslib-exec
refer to gcc390.pdf to see a description of how to cross-compile for CMS.
The pipeline support for bfs does indeed use the BPX callable services.
I had
it:-)
Have a good weekend, too.
DJ
On 07/05/2017 12:41 PM, John P. Hartmann wrote:
Not really, Dave.
FPLNXF is compatible with DMSPFP, but it supports more/other. For
example, it allows you to install your own functions for SPECs.
On 07/05/2017 07:22 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
OK, so this is the old "s
On 07/05/2017 11:52 AM, John P. Hartmann wrote:
Dave,
DMSPFP TEXT S ought to do it. Otherwise you should find them at Marist,
but you might also look in your reader.
On 07/05/2017 06:38 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm trying to write a PIPE stage in assembler but at the link step I g
Dave,
To generate a filter package you must do LOAD and INCLUDE so as to make
the glue module the start of the filter package, so GENOD ... ( FROM
DMSPFP is de rigueur.
On 07/05/2017 06:38 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm trying to write a PIPE stage in assembler but at the link step I
Dave,
DMSPFP TEXT S ought to do it. Otherwise you should find them at Marist,
but you might also look in your reader.
On 07/05/2017 06:38 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm trying to write a PIPE stage in assembler but at the link step I get
"FPLNXF undefined".
I have done a:
gl txtlib
3
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:26:02
--
Mike Harding
z/VM System Support
From: "John P. Hartmann" <jphartm...@gmail.com>
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 06/28/2016 01:01 PM
Subject: Re: Speaking of SPECS NUMBER
Sent by: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List
<CMS-PIPELINES@V
Speaking of SPECS NUMBER
pipe literal *|dup 8|spec if #0=='' then set #0:=-5 else set #0+=1 endif print
#0 n|Cons
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:26:02
--
Mike Harding
z/VM System Sup
xlate 72 00-ff * blank blank
On 05/17/2017 02:54 PM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
In an IOCP file Column 72 usually has an arbitrary character to represent that
the next line is a continuation of this line.
How can I use a Pipe to Change every line that has Something other
addressing mode it was issued (better do the SVC below the
bar, methinks).
(Please pass this info on to Mikey in case he cares.)
On 05/08/2017 06:39 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 05/03/2017 at 08:29 GMT, "John P. Hartmann"
<jphartm...@gmail.com> wrote:
HNDSVC sets up a
In the meanwhile you could see if
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/#Runtime
works for you. Totally unsupported.
On 04/22/2017 02:00 AM, Donald Russell wrote:
Thanks Rob,
My first try was sqrt as part of spec but it didn't work, hence my
question.
I'll have to wait a couple of moths
This time of year on the Northern hemisphere, you will likely catch a cold.
Otherwise, try it; you'll learn much better from correcting your
mistakes on your own steam.
On 11/29/2016 12:21 PM, Offer Baruch wrote:
well, this worked just perfectly...
i do have one more question...
will the
Alan, CMS does not trap commands that are forwarded to CP by the default
setting IMPCP on; nor explicitly by the CP command of CMS.
I'd say SPOOL the console. Or perhaps read the manual.
It is true that
PIPE literal | starmsg | ...
will do as requested, but I'm sure something will
Leaving your home invented terminology aside,
First time a label is used, it marks the stage that it refers to.
Subsequent references are to additional streams for the stage that
declared the label. Since the program to run has already been
specified, subsequent references to the label must be
that part is
working. You might want to update the very last line on the page from:
Updated by John P. Hartmann July 30, 2015.
to today.
The link "http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/pipsysf; is broken, it gets a
404 error.
Have a good one.
DJ
https://github.com/jphartmann/cmslib-exec.git
Now contains a self-contained zlib filter package ZLIBSTG MODULE in the
vm archive fplgcc.vma. There is even ZLIB TXTLIB for the itrepid.
Works even with the standard z/VM pipeline from sunny Endicott.
Issue zlibstg to install it once you have
Some time ago for release 3 Rob did the interface to bzip.
On 06/29/2016 07:27 PM, Jonathan Scott wrote:
I must admit I've never come across any other filters written
in C.
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
